[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 27 KB, 468x675, 1228109313480.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
763602 No.763602 [Reply] [Original]

What is the most depressing book of all time?

>> No.763608

East of Eden
Remains of the Day
Unbearable Lightness of Being

>> No.763614

>>763608
I didn't find Unbearable Lightness of Being to be depressing.

>> No.763619

>Remains of the Day

shit....i forgot all about that one. Yeah...if you can read that without all your hopes and dreams shitting the bed, then....ummm....well that wont happen.

>> No.763624

>>763608
Never read Remains of the Day, but I found Never Let Me Go to be pretty depressing.

>> No.763761

The Girl Next Door

>> No.763764
File: 36 KB, 289x450, fine-balance.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
763764

This.

>> No.763775

>>763764
shit yes.
he builds it up so you think all the characters will live happily ever after and then they all just get fucked.

>> No.763781

>>763775
Yeah, but whatever you do, don't ruin the ending for anyone! ...you bastard.

>> No.763783

>>763781
If it's posted in a thread about incredibly depressing books, I think they can figure it out that the ending's not very happy.
My post was no more of a spoiler than your image.

>> No.763787

A Thousand Acres by Jane Smiley

>> No.763789

>>763783
There are a myriad ways a book can be depressing.

>> No.763796

>>763787
Protip: "There are myriad ways a book can be depressing" or "There is a myriad of ways a book can be depressing."

>> No.763802
File: 204 KB, 470x570, lol-y-u-mad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
763802

>>763796

>> No.763815

>>763802
I'm just improving /lit/'s vocabulary, one word at a time. Welcome to /lit/, new fag.

>> No.763825
File: 230 KB, 300x270, 1275964035738.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
763825

Recent criticism of the use of myriad as a noun, both in the plural form myriads and in the phrase a myriad of, seems to reflect a mistaken belief that the word was originally and is still properly only an adjective.... however, the noun is in fact the older form, dating to the 16th century.

>> No.763819 [DELETED] 

>>763815
<vocabulary

lawl, i think you mean grammar, lawl.

>> No.763829

>>763815
>vocabulary

lawl, i think you mean grammar.

>> No.763832

>>763825
If you want to use myriad as a noun, you must say "a myriad of." If you want to use it as an adjective, you must say "myriad." Do not ever say "a myriad."

>> No.763834
File: 48 KB, 533x594, lol_wut.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
763834

>>763825

>> No.763838
File: 2.00 MB, 1708x2126, pinkhitler.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
763838

>>763815
>new fag

Yes, the joys of being anonymous. You have no clue who the newfag really is.

For your enjoyment, a picture of a Grammar Nazi.

>> No.763859
File: 38 KB, 428x270, ECioran.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
763859

The Trouble With Being Born

>> No.763867

>>763859
Cioran is depressing and cynical, but he's also humoristic and quite deadpan.