[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 566 KB, 1700x1133, 1444691854073.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7431474 No.7431474[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

How come there are no good women writers?

>> No.7431477
File: 6 KB, 225x225, 1449457094099.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7431477

>> No.7431504

>>7431474
Ayy
>>7431477
Ayy

>> No.7431570

>>7431477
>>7431504
?

>> No.7431681

bump

serious answers only please

>> No.7431688

dykes are still technically women, OP

>> No.7431691
File: 25 KB, 449x444, keef.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7431691

>read misogyny thread on /lit/
>some people saying there are good women writers
>try to give women writers a chance
>it's literally all blogposting about relationships and whining about how they didn't get their way
>ALL OF IT

>> No.7431692

>>7431474
Do we need to have this thread every day?

>> No.7431697

>>7431474
because they're not men

>> No.7431707

>>7431697
b-but the faggots are the only reason men have good writers, anon.

we can't jettison them just cuz they're not real men unless we start claiming manly men fuck butt again. you remember what happens to betas in that: they go full pb shelley. you don't want that for yourself, anon =/

>> No.7431714

I realize now that I have never read a book by a woman
Am I missing something

>> No.7431720

>>7431714
best french writing since sade

>> No.7431722
File: 40 KB, 316x297, EliotShig.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7431722

No significant emotions to be entirely (well, inasmuch as I can claim the authority of being 'entirely'; I do want to work within a frame here that recognizes the fallibility of human senses and the impossibility of a truly 'objective' claim--though, to be fair (and not to sound like reddit with that phrase), the word 'entirely' has the built-in subjectivity of human life assumed within it) honest with you here right now family

>> No.7431731

>>7431720
who would that be

>> No.7431734

>>7431722
I really love your post-modern tweets tbqh with you family.

>> No.7431739
File: 47 KB, 304x475, rape.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7431739

>>7431714

>> No.7431745

>>7431692
last one got deleted for no reason so yes apparently

and the question still went unanswered

>> No.7431761

>>7431731
Anne Desclos

>> No.7431973

vump

>> No.7431989

interesting opinion, although I'd be surprised you'd still have it if you read some of my favorite books.

>> No.7432006
File: 1.13 MB, 1200x1464, Fumiko_Hayashi_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7432006

>>7431474
Because you have shit taste op.

>> No.7432011

>>7431474
The logical flaw here is that you assume they are bad writers because they are women, but the real reason all women writers are bad writers is because ALL writers are bad writers.

>> No.7432017

>>7431691
Virginia Woolf as a woman had a deeper internal narrative than probably any /lit/ poster ever has. For fuck sake man study up on this shit before coming onto /lit/ and then projecting your hilariously stupid worldview onto the canon. There are excellent writers who were women.

>> No.7432023

>>7431989
?

>> No.7432487

bump

>> No.7432503

Lack of suffering.

>> No.7432528

>>7431474
Because they've only had a chance to write for about 30-50 years now. Before that, men oppressed them for all of human history. They were able to do this because aliens came down to earth and gave men a boost in all cognitive abilities and made women dumb-dumbs. Only recently have we been working to undo this, so really it isn't their fault

>> No.7432532

>>7431474

Donna Tart & Ayy Rayynd are pretty good. Secret History was great in terms of comfy, and Goldfiddich was a pretty good read all in all.

Bring it haters

>> No.7432538

Hey guys, i'm in swedish class and i need help with some poetry. Please help.

>> No.7432544
File: 575 KB, 680x680, trash 3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7432544

>>7431474
>>7431691
>>7431688
>>7432503
>>7432528

>> No.7432546
File: 267 KB, 465x397, b2w.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7432546

>>7432544
>>7432017
time to change your tampons, roasties

your mad is leaking out

>> No.7432552

>>7432544
>not ignoring thread
Why?

>> No.7432565

>>7431477
>>7431504
>>7431570
>>7431681
>>7431688
>>7431691
>>7431692
>>7431697
>>7431707
>>7431714
>>7431720
>>7431722
>>7431731
>>7431734
>>7431739
>>7431745
>>7431761
>>7431973
>>7431989
>>7432006
>>7432011
>>7432017
>>7432023
>>7432487
>>7432503
>>7432528
>>7432532
>>7432538
>>7432544
>>7432546
>>7432552
hello there, reddit!!