[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 142 KB, 495x700, 1431909825362.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429496 No.7429496 [Reply] [Original]

You have 30 seconds to refute Stirner's The Ego and His Own.
You can't. All your "counterarguments" are spooks.

>> No.7429498

>>7429496
i don't wanna refute it

>> No.7429516
File: 39 KB, 245x320, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429516

Spooks are spooks

>> No.7429534

>>7429496
the creative nothing is itself a spook

the reification of the ego is spook as fuck

the distinction between non-ego and ego is spook

>> No.7429535
File: 113 KB, 600x741, uI2ECgG.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429535

His arguments wouldn't be taken seriously in a third-world country. They're ideas for the perpetually bored.

BTFO?

>> No.7429541
File: 150 KB, 245x320, 1443787493660.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429541

>>7429516
Here's the animated version for you

>> No.7429549

>>7429496
Isn't it true that he was a c.uockold and nobody showed up at his funeral? But I guess he inherited some money from his wife so he could sit around and write a book.

>> No.7429559
File: 157 KB, 992x880, 1446833838438.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429559

>>7429549
>he was a c.uockold
>nobody showed up at his funeral
Social approval is spooky

>> No.7429563

>>7429549
>He was a c.uckold
Pretty nice tbqh. Nothing wrong with that if you keep getting money from the bitch.
>nobody showed up at his funeral
You're dead so who gives a damn.

>> No.7429570
File: 19 KB, 200x515, stirner.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429570

>>7429534
>the distinction between non-ego and ego is spook
That is a pretty compelling argument. I guess the distinction is in discerning which spooks are beneficial to the self and which are detrimental. Something that is unlikely to be achieved until the realisation of spooks.

>> No.7429593
File: 94 KB, 1200x900, pills-tbh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429593

Does anyone else think Stirner is a precursor to MGTOW and "Red pill" ideas that sprung up on the internet in the last few years? Both recognise societal ideals and roles as "spooky" and not beneficial to the self, whilst advocating what is essentially egoism and self interest.

>> No.7429716
File: 41 KB, 250x250, 1448729671275.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429716

>>7429593

>> No.7429725

>>7429593
what is to live with zero cultural awareness whatsoever

>> No.7429730
File: 27 KB, 500x500, 1449075001927.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429730

>>7429725
Distinctly material and non-spooky.

>> No.7429773
File: 126 KB, 849x1052, 1427976384026.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429773

>>7429593

>> No.7429782
File: 105 KB, 504x266, 1446375667196.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429782

>>7429593
Yes, Max Stirner was the original self-hating beta kek anti-european male. His example eventually morphed into this dangerous belief that is destroying the European race a little bit more, day by day.

>> No.7429785

>>7429782
>>>/b/lacked.com

>> No.7429793

>>7429782
You really love this picture.

>> No.7429805
File: 273 KB, 450x450, 1446525726289.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429805

>>7429782
>European race
Nice spooks m9

>> No.7429807
File: 37 KB, 172x157, 1444477955399.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7429807

>>7429793
Yeah, it's one of my favorites to be honest.

>> No.7429811

Kek.

>> No.7430691
File: 58 KB, 636x674, 1446421029468.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7430691

>>7429782
>dangerous belief
I don't think so family. Stirner specifically argues against beliefs.

>> No.7430691,1 [INTERNAL] 

sorry for my English, but I found this forum looking for information about Stirner and I found this forum. only the images I died laughing. I recently read The Ego and Its Own and it was amazing, motivated by anarchist ideas, I admit. I study sociology in Buenos Aires and recently in a class on Habermas returned to see the neo-Hegelians to explain the thesis of objectification of marx and then explain the theory of Habermas. Ask the teacher about Stirner and did not know him, and most teachers have no mention about, even myself into my early student and never saw. (I mean, the teachers knew him, but I had not read carefully) Stirner is certainly a well-aimed kick, totally denied by dogmatic minds and bourgeois intellectuals. Oh, and thanks for accepting me in the forum, this is new to me.

>> No.7430691,2 [INTERNAL] 

>>7430691,1
>thanks for accepting me in the forum
Hello Rodrigo. The site is free for all. though this is just an archives page. Here's the main main page http://boards.4chan.org/lit/

>objectification of marx
I think you mean objectivism