[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 118 KB, 294x371, Immanuel_Kant_(painted_portrait)[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7403829 No.7403829 [Reply] [Original]

Imannuel Kant is the most important philosopher ever and Critique of Pure Reason is the most important book ever written
prove me wrong

>> No.7403830

take it to /hist/ nerd

>> No.7403860

>>7403829
>Imannuel Kant is the most boring philosopher ever and Critique of Pure Reason is the most boring book ever written
prove me wrong

ftfytbhfam

>> No.7404581

>>7403829
>prove me wrong

But i Kant

>> No.7404594
File: 39 KB, 350x433, hegel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7404594

>kant
>most important

get in line brah

>> No.7404599

boards.4chan.org/lit/thread/7402347

>> No.7404936
File: 1.87 MB, 400x398, 1448834927958.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7404936

>>7404594
>Hegel
>More important than Kant

>> No.7404976
File: 189 KB, 398x307, 1447907397130.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7404976

>>7404936
>idolizing 18th century autists

>> No.7404989

>>7403829

Kant, like most philosophers, was a complete retard who was incapable of understanding that something having an internal logical consistency doesn't make it correct.

>>7404594

See above.

>> No.7404990

>>7404976
Why am I laughing so hard a this

>> No.7404991

>>7403829
He setup a strawman to destroy reason from the inside. Why? To reintroduce altruism by means of mysticism.

Fuck Kant.

>> No.7404996

why did they do a portrait from that angle does anyone know

>> No.7405003
File: 346 KB, 1829x788, 1448408062481.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7405003

>>7404989

>> No.7405070

>>7404996
Maybe to emphasize his large head which contained his large brain.

>> No.7405092

>>7405003
That man is everything I want to be

>> No.7405625

>>7403829
I agree that is the most important philosopher within the last 500 years, but I say this for different reasons than OP.

It's apparent that whether or not you agree with his philosophy, he steered philosophy into a new direction.

>> No.7405650
File: 72 KB, 425x282, Checkmate.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7405650

>>7404989
Then why did he devote a whole section to "the antinomies of pure reason"

>> No.7405678
File: 90 KB, 480x320, kant-critique-disclaimer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7405678

problematic tbqh

>> No.7405700

>>7403829
kant a shit

burden of proof is on you

>> No.7405708

>>7405678
To be fair the critique of judgement does have any entire section talking about how he thinks blacks are mentally inferior and are incapable of creating art.

>> No.7405726

>>7405708
and since then he has been thoroughly BTFO by the likes of Octavia Butler and Tee-Hee Coats

>> No.7405748
File: 103 KB, 624x434, 1428860674072.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7405748

>>7403829
>babies first philosophy class
jesus fuck man.

>> No.7405760

>>7405748
Plenty of people like Kant

>> No.7406325

>>7405748
Then give me a more advanced philosopher than Kant.
Oh wait there is none.

>> No.7406425

Leo the fat, most important philosopher

>> No.7406433

>>7406325
Wittgenstein

>> No.7406521
File: 80 KB, 500x669, 1443873193149.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7406521

>>7405726

>> No.7406536

>>7404989
He says as much in the first 100 pages of Pure Reason, and the doctrine itself is made to limit the effective use of of logic and create boundaries.

>> No.7406601

>>7406521
>vacuumed sucked that muthafucka
>tfw feeling your nut rise from the sac of your balls
never not funny

>> No.7406644

>>7403829
i think that gautama takes the crown

>> No.7406663

>>7403829

What exactly was the influence of Critique of Pure Reason?

>> No.7406664

>>7406663
Einstein read it.

>> No.7406675

>>7405678
what's with the arabian nights font? prolly subliminal.

>> No.7406677

>>7406664

Ok, I'm sure Einstein read a lot of things.

>> No.7406734

>>7406521
Objectively speaking, that's horrible writing.

>> No.7406775

>>7403829
I don't know about most important.

But his Perpetual Peace essays are some of the best philosophy I've ever read.

If you haven't read them yet, do it NOW

>> No.7406803

>>7404991
He discusses the pitfalls of altruism, empathy and idealism in the first 5 pages of Perpetual Peace you nerd