/lit/ - Literature

>>7355535
http:// bookzz. org /s/?q=rodney+merrill&t=0

There you go.

>>7355570

That's "The Odyssey".

>>7355535
>>7355582
Who is this semen demon? My God, she is literally perfect.

>>7355590
You must literally only watch "blockbuster movies" that are advertised on TV to not know who she is; she's not even "obscure".

Use "Google Image Search".

>>7355590
>sees two pictures of a woman
>doesn't even know who she is
>"she is literally perfect"

Why do people do this

>>7355598

Because they are materialistic, and only take physical appearance into account when judging a person.

>>7355596
I don't have a TV and I don't watch movies at all; I read and listen to music. Your first two images turned up nothing on reverse image search but the third one did. Thanks.

>>7355598
>doesn't even know who she is
99.999999% of women don't have a personality worth shit. It's mostly down to judgement of aesthetics.

>>7355598
Men's sexuality is mostly visual. Anyone who denies this is a woman or a beta kek.

Anyway... "The Iliad"... Rodney Merrill... Free download, please...

I would be very thankful.

>>7355608
>>>/r9k/

>>7355621
The Pirate Bay

>>7355608
She's an actress. Pretty sure she was in The Grand Budapest Hotel, by Wes Anderson. Very good movie, though she's only a supporting character.

>>7355622
>>7355608
>I don't have a TV and I don't watch movies at all; I read and listen to music.
>I read
>my main hobby

Please fuck off back to /reddit/ with your feminist objections.

>>7355627
Found it now, thanks. It's Saoirse Ronan for anyone else curious. Absolutely stunning... I don't even like blondes usually.

>>7355596

I have no idea who that girl is either.

No need to act hostile and supercilious.

>>7355630
>think more than .0000001% of women have at least something resembling personality
>"feminist objections"

>>>/r9k/

>>7355643
I've met hundreds of girls and dated dozens. Less than 5 had a personality interesting enough that would make them worth spending time with if they were male. Don't assume I'm a kissless virgin just because I don't conform to your worldview.

>>7355679
Don't assume that the airheaded sluts you date represnt all women.

>>7355688
>all
>99.999999%

By the way, sorry for shitting up your thread OP. These fucking SJWs.

I've tried aaargh, bibliotik and libgen, OP. Only Odyssey.

I have read Merrill's Iliad, though, I ordered it from my library. You might give that a shot. It is really good.

>>7355688
m'lady

>>7355535
Why not just buy the hardcopy? It will make you look patricianish

>>7355590
saeiourse the greek

>>7355590
saoirse ronan

>>7355620
Have you ever heard a woman moaning during sex? Way more arousing than any of those shopped pics.

ugh

please

>>7355679
so true but we can't say it

>>7355596
"Nice" "meme" "desu"

>>7355598
>Things Only a Grill Would Say for $200

>>7355602
Isn't judging strictly physical appearance into account anti-materialistic, in that it ignores the person's economic and social status?

>>7357443
How retarded are you? Use a fucking dictionary, man.

>>7357460
>excessively concerned with material possessions; money-oriented.
Use a dictionary yourself, retard.

>>7357465
materialistic

MATERIAListic

MATERIAL, from MATTER

Is the body not made of matter?

"Materialistic" means to be overly concerned with material things, and with things of a material nature. It does not mean "to overly care for someone's social, or economic position".

>>7357484
>money-oriented.
>concerned with material possessions
>material possessions
>possessions
>possessions
>possessions
This is why you're a feminist. You can't understanding anything that doesn't confirm your beliefs.

>>7357484
autism

>>7357728
You're not making any fucking sense.

>>7357484
>>>/r9k/ may be orders of magnitude less intelligent than >>>/lit/ but at least they don't tolerate absolutely moronic woman sympathisers like you. All you ideology over rationality plebs need to get off my board.

>>7357739
I think you meant "superficial" not "materialistic".

>>7357754
What are you even talking about?

>>7357484
That's not what materialism means. What a word means is not the same as its root. There are countless examples of other words like this and also no respected definitions that support your argument. Fuck off.

>>7357761
No.

>>7357739
>>7357761
>>7357765
You're too stupid to be here. Please go to >>>/his/ or something. Retards like you are shitting up this board (And making all women look bad).