/lit/ - Literature

Like Communism: workable in the short-term, but ultimately goes against human nature and will fail.

Not a /lit/ thread, go away.

>What's your opinion on 'open' relationships /lit? Is polygamy at all feasible or is it just for defeminized women who lets other women fuck their husband?

Cucking for people who don't like the term cuck
degeneracy

>>7294967
this is useful but I wish it were better presented. also polygamy occurs with the most "feminine"/vulnerable women, brainwashed by religion/culture into a subservient role often determined by the narrow window of their biology, which is why feminists hate polygamy even when they're sex-positive you-do-you-gurl

>>7294935

In my experience everyone I met that claimed to be in an "open relationship" ended it within a few months.

symptom of a problem with society, but not a problem

also not /lit/ fuck off

>>7295001
Same.

Recently a girl I was dating revealed that she "didn't believe in monogamy" and I instantly relegated her to bootycall status. To me it's not a relationship if it's not monogamous.

I don't think there's anything wrong with it.

I mean, you'd share your cheerios, right?

a true patrician consorts exclusively with prostittutes with is an almost necessarily "open" relationship

>>7295033
i'd let a man fuck my cheerios before eating them tbqh(to be quite honest)

>>7295033
Kek

what a waste of time story

>Love as a relation between men and women was ruined by the desire to make sure of the legitimacy of children.

>The psychology of adultery has been falsified by conventional morals, which assume, in monogamous countries, that attraction to one person cannot coexist with a serious affection for another. Everybody knows that this is untrue.

>Even in civilised mankind faint traces of a monogamic instinct can sometimes be perceived.

Monogamy BTFO by the KING of reasoning.

>For most of his adult life Russell maintained that religion is little more than superstition and, despite any positive effects that religion might have, it is largely harmful to people. He believed religion and the religious outlook (he considered communism and other systematic ideologies to be forms of religion) serve to impede knowledge, foster fear and dependency, and are responsible for much of the war, oppression, and misery that have beset the world.

monogamous relationships are pretty spooky tbh

>>7295226
The problem with Russell is that I already agree with everything he says. That makes reading him a waste of time.

>>7294935
Had an open relationship with my girlfriend for probably around two years. We each had three partners during that time. Not because of any rule system or equality. It just kind of turned out that way. Now i'm still with that girl. We never actually decided that our relationship was no longer "open" but we haven't fucked anyone else in three years mostly because, oddly, the other people couldn't handle it. Lots of insecurity and jealousy and manipulative behavior, especially on the part of one of her guys and one of my girls. Eventually I just said "Look, girlfriend, you know how we roll, you know this isn't jealous rage, but seriously if he does this, or says this, or even thinks about this, i'm going to fucking beat his ass" So we just stopped with that stuff. We've been together for five years since.

All in all, totally fesable among honest open people who genuinely prioritise the friendship of all parties involved over sex with any one member. Which is of course very rare, but still totally fesable and possible. As soon as that understanding falters the relationship(s) go with it

>>7294956
lolol monogamy and capitalism are human nature. Go suck rush limbaugh's adolescent greasy cock.

That woman deserves it. What an ass.

>>7294935
That screencap is artfully crafted bait, right? Nobody could actually be that stupid?

>>7294935
Why call it a relationship if it's open? Why not just be friends who fuck? How is it even a 'relationship' if it's not exclusive?

>>7295268
Because out of you and the friends that are all sxexually open with each other, two of them can live together or be married or just be more permanent than the others, who may or not even be part of the labeled "relationship"

>>7295268
This. Seems totally pointless to get emotionally invested in such a thing.

The church should do more to discourage none monogamous heterosexual relationships

>>7295266
Nah fam, there's plenty of stories like that on the 'relationship' subreddit except that, most of the time, it's the guy getting the short end of the stick.

>>7295275
You are not even a Christian, so you have not place telling the Church her duty.

>>7295283
Yeah, can't let any new thoughts enter your ideological economy

>>7295266
People really are that stupid yes. But the stupid ones are the guys that save such images as some kind of comfort.

>>7295287
Ah, no. The Church is supposed to be unchanging.

>>7295283
>you're not a Christian
You know what goes on in my head?

>>7295292
The church is unchanged however their influence on politics isn't

>>7295226
>Monogamy BTFO
Uhm, what? No he didn't. It's common knowledge that monogamy is the only way for 99% of people to live happy, healthy lives, not just short term but long term.