/lit/ - Literature

I INFER THAT EPIPHANIES OCCUR WHEN CERTAIN PHYSIOLOGICAL, MENTAL, AND SENTIMENTAL, CONDITIONS COINCIDE.

HOW DO SUCH CONDITIONS COINCIDE, AND SPECIFICALLY WHAT KIND OF CONDITIONS ARE NECESSARY/REQUIRED? I DO NOT KNOW.

I HAVE ALREADY STATED SEVERAL TIMES THAT EPIPHANIES TEND TO OCCUR DURING RECTAL STIMULATION, EITHER DIRECT, OR INDIRECT, DURING DEFECATION, BUT THAT IS JUST ONE OF THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE EPIPHANIC PROCESS; THE ULTIMATE CAUSES ARE STILL UNKNOWN TO ME, OR TO ANYONE ELSE CURRENTLY ALIVE THAT I KNOW.

Epiphany means apparition or revelation, it means being able to see what you did not see it before. It's a veil that falls and makes you see clearly. It happens not when things "make sense", but precisely when things stop making sense, that is, when you uncover on some side, another side is covered. When something is revealed to you, that is the moment the quest for seeing it ends. So that when you are engaged in a complex of thoughts and you reach an epiphany, it is as if you made those thoughts useless and you can now move on from it. The epiphany comes always from some risk, some courageous thought that emerges as an act, rather than as means to balance out several ideas. It is a glimpse, an irrational fortuitous accident that makes you think something and make loose just the right string of the knot, relieving all others from the pressure. It happends when you conclude before you understand and then understand because you've concluded it.

>>7206598
>WHEN CERTAIN PHYSIOLOGICAL, MENTAL, AND SENTIMENTAL, CONDITIONS COINCIDE
Through the completion of a ritual on the spectrum of possible rituals?

>being able to see what you did not see it before
I have rehearsed not answers, but pretense of answers, anticipation of answers.
I have upholstered myself with anticipation, but no answers.
I am not referring to "seeing", which is simply an assemblage of colours,
but the intellectual relations I make between said colours as they metamorphose during my transmigration through present times.
I wonder about that sometimes: the notion of having answers and not simply anticipations.
I presume what I mean by this is not only the answer,
but the answer would consist of objective criteria for that which would be necessary to know.
The answer would then fall in to the category of an anticipation or X, Y, Z.
The answer would know itself as farce or "answer" or X, Y, Z, before it knew itself as the answer,
as in that which entails both knowledge of what is objectively to be known, to be experienced,
as well as the experience itself: "Nirwana", "Enlightenment", and is to be lost and found in moments and away from said moments.
We label "Epiphany" perhaps in a false way. There are epiphanies that are composed of different attributes.

>>7208538
I forgot to adopt my tripcode and username.

>>7206598
Perhaps the mysterious prostate orgasm could shed some light on the issue.

I'm writing some thing,
but I won't be done today.
It will take some days,
maybe a week.

I haven't confined myself to any one goal,
but I have the idea of furnishing the mind as far as it can be furnished,
through "short stories",
and if I happen to stumble upon Nirwana then so be it.

I might complete a [short story?] within the week. I will save these stories and essays to my computer, on my desktop,
as opposed to not.

>>7209726
I forgot to adopt my tripcode and username.

>>7209730
>>7209726
Again.

>>7208538
>Through the completion of a ritual on the spectrum of possible rituals?

I DO NOT COMPREHEND THE QUESTION; DEFINE "RITUAL".

DO YOU MEAN TO ASK IF MY HYPOTHESIS PRESUPPOSES THAT A PERSON CONSCIOUSLY, OR UNCONSCIOUSLY, PERFORMS AN ACTION, OR SERIES OF ACTIONS, THAT CAUSES THE TRIPLE CONCURRENCE OF CONDITIONS? IF SO, THE ANSWER IS NO; MY HYPOTHESIS DOES NOT PRESUPPOSE CONSCIOUS, OR UNCONSCIOUS, PERFORMANCE OF A SPECIFIC ACTION, OR SERIES OF ACTIONS, BUT RATHER THE CONCURRENCE WOULD OCCUR STOCHASTICALLY.

>>7210781
Perhaps the word "procedure" is more conducive.
Time, taking free will in to account, realises itself in "procedures", defined by the creative interaction with extension. On this spectrum of possible procedures, there can be anything between none and all possibilities leading to what may be referred to as an "epiphany", which I would imagine is also defined by creative interaction with extension, extension being that which has been taken, mistakenly or not, as a concrete exterior force as opposed to some thing which has arisen out of the mind's creation and interaction with those things which are taken to be concrete. Perhaps we have known an epiphany which has been seized as external, when in fact it had not been, its procedure unconscious to us and never to be known again. The new epiphany would know itself as objective knowledge on its procedure and its procedure in itself.

>DO YOU MEAN TO ASK IF MY HYPOTHESIS PRESUPPOSES THAT A PERSON CONSCIOUSLY, OR UNCONSCIOUSLY, PERFORMS AN ACTION, OR SERIES OF ACTIONS, THAT CAUSES THE TRIPLE CONCURRENCE OF CONDITIONS?
No, I understand what you are referring to as epiphany is something that has been triggered externally to your understanding in the past.

>THE CONCURRENCE WOULD OCCUR STOCHASTICALLY
Then what is the value of the notion of an epiphany?

This reminds me of Quantum physics.
Just the last part.
Question, out of curiosity: Do you believe in free will?

>>7209726
Update: Still writing something, to be done in a few days.