[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 94 KB, 702x1138, reviewbrah_by_charlottemahoney-d7l7syf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7084982 No.7084982[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

is this art?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=167&v=IukTiqAqVBM

>> No.7084992

>>7084982
I don't know, but I think he is hilarious and I am subbed to him.

>> No.7085015

is this /lit/?

>>7084982

>> No.7085025

>>7084982

This is the kind of kid I have to keep shielding from getting his ass kicked every single day

Thanks for the reminder school starts tomorrow OP -_-

>> No.7085031

>>7084992
>not knowing about reviewbrah
>2015

So I'm here to review this post.

JK, just go watch the pizza review.

>> No.7085037

>>7085025
Are you kidding me? He's the kind of kid that would be an all star in school. He would just never get laid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXbj2fE2mMI

^ best reviewbrah video

>> No.7085040

>>7085031
I was subbed to him before this post, you accidentally mistook me for a newfriend

>> No.7085049

>>7085031
>on a literature board
>can't read

>> No.7085050
File: 304 KB, 1148x1022, 1435644555739.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7085050

>>7085040
OOPS

>> No.7085052

>>7084982
What are you doing, dude? /ck/ is fun, but keep it on /ck/. You're going to attract undergrads to the board with this crossposting, asshole

>> No.7085060

>roastie

>> No.7085090

SOC 310: Studies in Early 21st Century Post-Irony

>> No.7085097

>>7085031
which one?

>> No.7085115

>>7085097
the earliest

>> No.7085146

didnt even watch it but of course it is, that guy fuckin rules. hes an ubermensch imo

>> No.7085177

https://youtu.be/HWxRPaFFI10

>"You know how much these cost?"
>"Cause I sure as hell don't."

>> No.7085180

>>7084982
Was he really attempting to see dissolved particles under light?
>didn't look at the samples under a microscope
>didn't do ppm analysis
>didn't research on sourcing used for the product
What a terrible review. Fucking dropped.

>> No.7085186
File: 1.95 MB, 350x263, 1420573798859.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7085186

>> No.7085190

>reviewbrah will never do childrens book reviews