/lit/ - Literature

>>7034653
>all of them shitty authors
i wonder

>>7034655
haha epic xd

>>7034653
Well they should read the editions printed in their own language certainly.

>>7034670
Female humor, everyone

>>7034674
but he is a tranny

>>7034653
le women just don't understand XD

>>7034681
pretty convincing

>>7034655
w was poetic af even if you don't get the philosophy tbh

>>7034674
I prefer lame jokes like that than the usual I HAVE A VAGINA....SEX! tbh

>>7034697
christ women have it easy

>>7034699
dat like a joke book or sumthin

Hemingway was a self pitying friendzoned beta, women understand this particular kind of man very well which is why that nurse got the fuck away and married an alpha Italian stud instead.

>>7034674
To talk down to the childish sexist meme poster? (Who is no doubt joking. I mean what's so hard to understand about Hitchens?)
I don't see anything inherently feminine about it.

>>7034681
hahahaha Okay kid.

>>7034699
I hear a lot of women are reading that.

>>7034710
>I hear a lot of women are reading that.
But are they understanding it? Also, or you trans*?

>>7034710
How do I stop being attracted to girls who use tumblr?

>>7034718
Who's to say men are understanding it when they read it?

>>7034731
Um, because it's written by a man duh!

>>7034653

> 1. My dick is all that is the case
>>> 1.1 You've got a nice ass
>>> 1.12 Whether or not are your pussy is wet may or may not be the state of affairs
>> 1.2 Your lips
>> 1.3 Those thighs
>> 1.4 The totality of that pussy determines what is and what is not the case


no wonder why bitches can't appreciate this nigga's genius

>>7034699
Infinite Jest is probably the most homely book you can read if you grew up in North America. I don't know why it would be limited to men

>>7034731
Who's to say there's anything there to understand?
>>7034737
Who had no discernible talent.

>>7034718
No, I'm not. I actually made enemies on /lgbt/ for my strong opinions on this issue.

>>7034728
Oh I haven't even tried to do that. I will always admire a pretty face.

>>7034763
Can't really say since I've never read it, but I'm going to give DFW the benefit of the doubt since what I have read of his is generally well written and insightful.

Now stop repeating Bloom memes.

Nietzsche
Heidegger
Hegel

>he believes in women as an identity

>>7034763
>I actually made enemies on /lgbt/ for my strong opinions on the issue
Which opinions? As an MtF I'm interested on this.

>>7034670
What the fuck
How is this a joke?
What the fuck

>>7034838
Bluntly, that you can have the gender but not the sex.
I wont accept Jenner as a lesbian. I mean no offense though.

Women's brains are physically simpler and they think differently. They tend toward cunning concrete thinking within established paradigms and the simplest path to the goal.

That's not necessarily a disadvantage in many ways, and even Schopenhauer eventually admitted they "grew more than males if they got away from the herd." (whatever that means.)

So, they don't philosophize, except simply, and philosophers only make a shallow impression on them, for better or worse.

>>7034653
who is this semon demon?

Le Fedora King

>>7034852
But what if she likes another woman and said woman likes her back? Wouldn't that make them a lesbian couple by definition (if you consider Jenner as a woman because of her gender)?

>>7034852
This shitposter reminds of evangelical christians who turn leftist. They tend to retain the impliable mindset.
I'm guess he/it waa once a protestant tbh

>>7034697
You don't have to pick one

>>7034763
DFW had undeniable talent. You're a fuckface.

>>7034852
Sexuality pertains to sex not gender.

>>7034853
ok #smsaudio

>>7034836
Tbh for most women gender is not a spook

Virgil

>>7034848
Chinese speaking women aren't going to get Hitchens because they can't read it, etc.
It's simply badgering the OP

>>7034863
Fine and dandy, but no I would not consider him/her a woman. Sorry.

>>7034868
I was. But I retain scant traces of it.

>>7034885
It was a joke.

>>7034905
You can have the feminine/masculine dichotomy (though I like femme to mid-butch) it's the sex itself that is all ours.

>>7034933
Have you talked with trans people before? Do you keep this views when it comes to refer to said people as a female or a male?

>>7034708
Hemingway fucked like a billion women.
Why is it people try to claim men they don't like as virgins

>>7034953
Only on 4chan.
I have never met any, see a few in public, (Mostly FtM I think) would keep it to myself unless confronted. I'd be as polite about it as I can.

>>7034972
Masculinity is tied to sexual virility.

For this reason Brett Ashely is a masculine character and Jack is a feminine character.

Hemingway was really ahead of the curve when it came to gender roles if you ask me.

has anyone ever met a(n?) FtM that actually fully embraced masculinity?

>>7034992
There's a lot of those in /lgbt/. They're arguably the best colective of the entire board. Pretty cool guys with a great sense of humor.

ps: lesbians are bunch of salty bitches

>>7035006
LesGen had a few nice posters, but it's dominated by various types of trolls and general ass hatery. Be glad you don't have a Kek on this board.

>>7035006
When it comes to /lgbt/, it's FtMs > fags > lesbians >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MtFs from most sane to batshit insane.

Though you can't really blame lesbians for acting the way they do, considering that trannies are constantly obsessed with them and shit up lesgen and won't fuck off to their "transbian" general.

I used to think that women who exclude trannies from their social events are assholes since they're oppressing an already pretty oppressed, marginalized, tiny group. Then moot made /lgbt/. Now I can understand their disgust of trannies completely.

I've known a few people, two girls and one black guy that refused to read bukowski or hemingway. fucking idiots

>>7035075
I wouldn't recommend bukoswki anyways. It's a fucking highway to depression.

>>7034933
>I retain scant traces of it.
No, you don't, and it is always the opposite. Christianity is a pliable and diverse religion and the different sects simply attract the minds which are drawn to them, in this case Evangelicalism attracted your obnoxiously opinionated personality.

http://psp.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/03/12/0146167215575731.abstract
>Gender Differences in Responses to Moral Dilemmas
>Previous research suggests that deontological judgments are shaped by affective processes, whereas utilitarian judgments are guided by cognitive processes.
>A meta-analytic re-analysis of 40 studies with 6,100 participants indicated that men showed a stronger preference for utilitarian over deontological judgments than women when the two principles implied conflicting decisions (d = 0.52).
>PD further revealed that women exhibited stronger deontological inclinations than men (d = 0.57), while men exhibited only slightly stronger utilitarian inclinations than women (d = 0.10).

Women don't respond to the utalitarian or principalled arguments to the same extent that men do, and generall ignore due to feels.

>>7035246
Also my keyboard ate some words and letters.

>>7034755

>>7035075
dats cuz niggas cant read

>>7034861
>WoW didn't exist so he just made it up and wrote about it instead
>friendzoned by his oneitis
>tried to get /fit/ by boxing
>suicided when his mum died and his NEETbux stopped

Truly an Anon.

>>7035143
No, I was born to it, and now I'm 100% free of it and any theistic beliefs
>Christianity is a pliable and diverse
In other words; all heresy to each others sects.

>>7034972
thats literally all women got tbh

'arguing with holes' is the perfect description of woman's arguing prowess.

as a matter of fact, it's the perfect description of women in general

if women didn't have holes men would throw rocks at them

>>7034670
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

OMG SO FUCKING FUNNY XD XD XD

ARE YOU LIKE A COMEDIAN OR SOMETHING THIS IS LIKE SOME AMY SCHUMER TIER COMEDY GOLD HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>7035006
>>7035051
Can confirm all of this

Lesbians (or the girls claiming to be lesbians, since maybe 10-20% are actual lesbians) are the bitterest cuntiest women on the fucking planet. NOBODY likes lesbians. They don't even like each other.

>>7034653
>either Hitchens

>>>/out/

Schopenhauer
Thoreau

>>7034710
please let me marry you, im in love with you. i'm not financially wealthy but i have a lot of books. are you a vegetarian?

>>7034710
A cute! A cute!

>>7036587
FUCK OFF SHE'S MINE

>>7036570
lawl Schopenhauer actually was a misogynist though. Only encounter with a woman I can think of who wasn't a poodle was that old lady he chucked down the stairs...

>>7037139
Too late anon.

>>7034710
would bully/10

>>7034681
that's hibari, don't mix up /lit/ celebrities.

>>7036181
>>7036097
>>>/pol/
>>>/r9k/

>>7034670
I laughed at the joke, and then I laughed at the /pol/-squad's reaction to it.

>>7037293
thanks for thinking of me, anon, it would mean a lot if it mattered at all.

>>7034836
I actually like this pill. I'd suscribe to it if it didn't defeat the purpose.

>>7034852
Don't worry, most trans people won't accept him anyway.

>Kant
>Schopenhauer
>any author that writes on the subject of war
>any war poet, just pick any of them
>Ernst Jünger
>Emil Cioran
>C.S. Forester
>"Homer" probably

They may be able to understand academically but they'll never relate or have a deep personal understanding.

>>7037337
Considering that there are more women in the military than 4channers I'd say you have a warped idea of who you're talking to.

>>7037315
You have shit taste in comedy, friend. Even Dane Cook makes better jokes than that.

>>7037309
>>>/s4s/
>>>/lgbt/
>>>/mlp/

>>7034852
could someone explain to me why this is such an unpopular opinion, even when it's not presented hatefully?
If a man physically alters his body and is endowed with fabricated genitals to offer the appearance of a woman, that does not make that person a woman, but rather a transgender woman, insofar as the individual is not, biologically speaking, actually physically female. Is there something I'm missing here?

/lit/ talks a lot of shit for a board full of dudes who miss the point of every single female-written novel

>>7038081
People claim that they have the brain of the opposite gender, even if their sex is the same as what they appear as. They distinguish between sex and gender. I think it's bullshit personally, but I don't care what people do with their own bodies.

>>7038105
>the point being im oppressed muh victim complex
No we see the point we just think it's dumb.

>>7034653
Hitchens really?

>>7038105

A lot of people on /lit/ love virginia woolfe though, why do you comment on things you don't understand.

Ever since dude cucked /pol/ /lit/ has been infected with it

>>7038113
>every single female-written book is about the same thing
you say this with such confidence

>>7038126
she's a token

>>7038134

Yes and you were generalizing in your statement don't you remember what you posted? The point being that /lit/ can and does appreciate female authors, also plenty of people like jane austen which is an easy one. On top of that as far as modern authors go jk rowlings is a popular lit female author . Fuck off with ur muh soggy knee.

>>7038081
male vs female is bullshit. People have chromosomes that aren't XX or XY. People have both a penis and a vagina, or neither. They aren't essentially male or female because no one is

>>7038147
well if that's the case what's wrong with having a preference for biologically female bodied people?

>>7038142
>/lit/ likes JK Rowling
such a stretch. If you actually think /lit/ isn't completely dismissive of female authors, you're delusional. The average 4chan user sees a female name on a book cover and their kneejerk reaction is that it's social justice bullshit somehow. If they actually read it, they spend the entire time assuming everything is about emotions or romance and analyze much less than they would for a male author.

And yeah, a few /lit/ users get past these obstacles and enjoy fucking To the Lighthouse, one of the most respected novels ever.

If I saw actual discussion on Morrison, Sappho, Oates, Cather, Yiyun Li or Octavia Butler, I would have more respect

>>7038154
there isn't. But "biologically female" is pretty subjective. Someone you perceive as 100% woman could have XY chromosomes or undescended testicles. You could artificially narrow down the people you want to be attracted to, but in reality, your dick has no idea what someone's body is actually like

>>7038196
there was a thread a while ago with actual discussion of Plath, it's not always that bad

>>7038335
Seriously? Any time I mention appreciating Plath's poetry people go on and on about "le depressed PMS woman" shit or something. I can't even mention her name in a thread about poetry without a dozen people shitting all over her because she killed herself.

>>7038229
>you could have all these 0.1% chance things
Right but that still means I want to fuck a woman, not an outlier.
The idea that sexuality only goes skin deep, but gender is complex, is stupid. You can't pigeonhole people into being "technically" sexually fluid on the off-chance they run into some abnormal situation.

>>7038196
>tfw read Kate Chopin's "The Awakening"
>tfw it literally is SJW bullshit

>>7038408
>a woman realizes she's never actually lived for herself and tries but is destroyed by a society that doesn't allow for such things

>SJW bullshit

You must be a swell person to talk to.

>>7038105
You mean Jane Austen probably (since she is the most underrated female author on /lit/) and while she's good there's no point to miss, everything good about her is in plain sight.
I know you didn't say, but if you think women are as good of writers as men (not inherently but in reality) you're in complete denial.

>>7038424
You just described sjw shit. I haven't read the awakening, but political fiction (as it seems to be by your description) is pretty much always garbage because it doesn't say anything about the human condition and it is a sorry way to prove a political point by strawmanning entire societies.

>>7038489
Uh, you realize that was the reality for American women at the beginning of the 20th century when Chopin was writing, right? It wasn't a "strawman", it was their life.

> haven't read the awakening
So what the fuck do you know about it? My one line description? Well, I guess you're quite the expert then.

>it doesn't say anything about the human condition
It's solely about the human condition. It's about being forced into a particular life with no way out except for death. That's as universally human as you can get. The fact that you're so quick to dismiss it as "political ficition" and "garbage" just shows you're more willing to trust a knee-jerk reaction to something having a female author than judge it by its own merits, which proves the point you were originally responding to.

This is worse than "misogyny" or being anti social justice or something. You're anti-intellectual. You'd rather hide in a comfortable cave of delusion than engage with ideas or authors that might challenge the validity of your narrow worldview.

>>7038489
>You just described sjw shit.
Then there is factually nothing wrong with SJW shit, you're just a fucking dumbass crybaby.

>Hemingway
He was a hack, nothing to understand.

>>7037323
>Hugs hibari
You're nice

>>7038081
I may be technically wrong about making enemies. They may just be trolls. Donno.

>>7036181
>>7034848
>>7034674
thanks for the (You)'s

>>7034710
are you severely depressed?

>>7038788
Far from it. Why do you ask?

I'm a girl and I understand and adore Bukowski, Hemingway, Whitman's civil war poems, and Thoreau. I particularly enjoy Bukowski's "Sometimes you get so alone that it just feels right", and "The Sun Also Rises."

There's just something about those Alcoholic writers.

Told my feminist girlfriend of the time women didn't understand/like Prisig, she got all offended and tried to read Zen and the Art. Gave up after the first third I think. She still has my copy the bitch.

>>7038936
>>7039115

Have you girls ever tried to read anything by Prisig? I feel like his writing is too systematic and unemotive for women (an probably most men) to appreciate

Those freaks are anamolies, not precedent. Dumbass

All this thread has done is make me want to brush up on Wittgenstein

>>7039115
>>7038936
Alright you fucking dolts, you're perniciously wrong and it makes me fucking mad.

You don't understand fucking bukowski because you've grown up with that fucking slit between your legs that imparts value from birth. The female condition is one of vibrant "Flowering" value and then slow decline. This is not the case with the male of the species, and it gives rise to authors like Hemingway and Bukowski whose central themes are more or less DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE to the male struggle for value on a societal, sexual and personal level. Bukowski's eclectic passive-aggression - his appeals to masculinity, his constant talking about being "big", a "Hairy ape" - these are uniquely male themes that he is describing that speak directly to the bearer of a penis who has constantly, subtly and unforgivingly had the struggle for value and status impressed upon him from the day he was born.

Sure, you can appreciate it, everyone can appreciate something, but there is an immutable core essence of these writers that you won't get, and this is precisely why.


Fuck off back to tumblr you idiot.

Pic related, it's you and your imbecile ilk.

inb4 bait, i don't even care anymore. Google "bukowski tattoos" if you want to be disappointed.

>>7040763
good post but
>muh no girls allowed author

grow up

>>7040773
>>7040763
What, you're slamming bukowski? he's not my personal favourite but he's undeniably one of the male authors who are patently difficult if not impossible to be understood by not a man, and widely accessible enough to be co-opted erroneously by swathes of doe eyed idiots with no dads.

But of course lit needs to find the fucking high ground somehow. You're just as bad, you fucking status failure of a male. Make like Plath and roast yourself you dickless twit.

>>7040763
this guy confirming MRA bullshit is just as annoying as feminist bullshit.

fuck off nerd women can be ugly and sad losers too. If anything sluts can get a weird mirrored version of what a loser guy feels when she realizes she is such a wreak she is only good for sex, just like a loser guy is only good for menial labor.

>>7040792
This isn't MRA bullshit you strawmanning kike, i'm saying that ugly loser women experience being an ugly loser DIFFERENTLY TO A MAN, within such there are IMMUTABLE, CORE DIFFERENCES

Jesus fucking christ you idiot, fuck off back to reading the guardian at your liberal arts degree

>>7040763
bukowski is shit regardless of gender

>>7040805
that's not the point you fuckwad - i never claimed he was good. Reread the post.

pic related, this is how fucking stupid you are.

>>7040813
i never said you said it was good

>>7040801
>some beta faggot pretending he has enough life experience in his 20~ meaningless years to make a statement about anything concerning anything.

You are so fucking pathetic, just because men and women are different in general does not mean they cant gather enough experiences in the long run to escape the understanding given by the general trend of their sex

you are like a shit statistician MRA trying to do psychology and its fucking laughable.

>>7040817

Ah yes, the last bastion of the stupid, the "HAHA I WAS JUST SHITPOSTING". You're the best evidence for theism if only so your creation can have a causal relationship with something else shitting.

>>7040827
FUCK. At least post some REBUTTLE WITH SUBSTANCE.

If i'm a 20 year old shitlord without enough experience to understand this concept, how is that 20 year old pretentious hipster faggot with daddy issues going to understand what it's like to grow up as a fucking man?

And that's not even accounting for quantifiable biological differences. Congratulations, dogma and modern ideology is on your side, you get to be king of the fucking plebeians.

Being this fucking retarded, jesus christ.

>>7034710
I wanna do some naked cuddling with you if you know what I mean bae

>>7040889
Same princess

>>7040763
The fact that MRAs think all girls are wanted by men and therefore have it easy throughout their lives confirms the fact that they're almost all permavirgins who would fuck literally anything with a vagina. To an average non-autistic male, girls exist on a scale of attractiveness and at least a third are in the realm of "unattractive, would not date or screw."

>>7041048
that isn't what he's saying though
being an ugly girl must be torture

>>7034670
HAHA I BET YOU THINK YOU WERE SO FUCKING FUNNY
Go suck chads dick you fucking whore.

i am >>7040763

and can confirm >>7041051
has grasped my point.

the butterfly grill is attractive

>>7040763
I like your point, but pic related.

>>7041492
thats not her she said she was 43 once
wonder if she is a mom

I don't really think women would want to understand Hemingway, he's genuinely misogynistic, and I'm fine with that, but I can understand why women wouldn't. I'd also say Soren Kierkegaard, since women have no real sense of existential doubts or fears.

>>7037505
Let's not kid ourselves though. It may not be the military men's intention, but those military woman only serve and fulfill one purpose: that their holes are given up to military men for their pleasure.

Thus, woman has never lost her main role, even during military commitment. Go to /k/ and ask, you will see that women in the army are fucking sl00ts.

>>7040763

I'm pretty sure we apply big and hairy ape to unattractive black women when we call them gorillas

>>7044005
It's pretty much exclusively a phenomenon of modern, industrialized militaries. /k/ has plenty of respect for womens' roles in historical combat, and even in auxiliary or combat groups of developing nations today, but that analysis generally maps to what they say about women in the US and a handful of European militaries.

Russia, on the other hand, is content to just use its own troops as holes. There was a huge expose a while back about massive underground forced prostitution rings in their military, almost always involving new recruits.

>>7043684
>misogynistic

There needs to be a moratorium on usage of this word. It's getting worn out from overuse. Same goes for "problematic". These words are being used so much over nothing that within a couple of decades they'll mean nothing at all.

>>7034670

I laughed until I saw who was posting

>>7037337
Homer was a woman you dip

Thomas Pynchon

>>7044151
Same thing that happened with racism versus systemic racism. Misogyny and Sexism are very related terms but by no means equivalent, and people either want to willingly obfuscate that, or have learned from people who want to willingly obfuscate that, and so continue the chain.

There was some article recently talking about how the 'dictionary definition' of racism wasn't good enough and I couldn't stop laughing. First of all, which dictionary? Second of all, just fucking explain what you mean. That's basic fucking argumentation.

>>7034653

>>>/r/books nigger

>>7034655
lol

>>7034828
nobody can understand the last two. i dont trust anybody who pretends otherwise

>>7034653
Me

>>7034710
Am I being paranoid? I don't think this is the real butterfly anymore. She talks wrong.

>>7044422
I'm the real butterfly

>>7044422
Real butterfly hasn't been around in a long time.

>>7034710
pls respond

>>7038394
You're implying that sex is a meaningful category when it comes to attraction, even though it isn't really. I'm much more attracted to twinks with curly hair than I am to landwhales, blond women, or grannies.

>>7034710
whats wrong with that wall behind her

>>7034728
tumblr short haired qt 3.14 are the best :3

>>7034861
C.L. Moore understood him

>>7044506
They usually have really high attention needs too, so negging works wonder.

do women read Wolfe?

Nietzche
Schopenhauer
Wittgenstein

Any of the three meme philosophers that 18 year olds like me pretend to have read and understood. Women are an inferior species and we should ignore the fact that fill literature, philosophy and history classes and objectively have a better understanding of these people than men.

>>7044516

>>7041048
That's contradictory.
If there are men who would fuck anything (and that's essentially a given, isn't it), then all girls are desired indeed.
The fact that hot girls have it easier than ugly girls doesn't change the fact that any girl can enter a male space (male sports, vidya community, hacker spaces, chess club) and gain attention and closedness from someone. Mr. neckbeard can't do that, he's disgusting to anyone.
Some of those, who are good at writing may write lone Hemmingway style books and then I understand the idea that only a man can feel the pain with them. And most kids today won't know war and hardship anyway, so it's not really a high horse they should step on.
The female problem is not getting the guy she want, but she can get -someone- to fall asleep next to her in any case. "The other woman has the man I desire - because she's better than me."
I don't think women are better off though tbh, because they have this shit-I'm-hitting-30-now-and-need-a-good-man-to-make-a-baby anxiety. I'd really love to read a literary work on that but from female authors I only know of fantasy books where some protagonist gets the perfect man.
The "I'm 35 and my lover won't dump his wife" story only every comes in the ward of comedy. Why is that the case anyway?

>>7036570
>Thoreau

During his lifetime he was known a "feminine philosopher."

>>7037144
Schopenhauer was a notorious womanizer and even had a daughter.

>>7044586
This is the worst attempt at being a contrarian ever.

I could slap my dick on the keyboard and the google search would return ten examples against your stupid post

>>7044589
>I could slap my dick on the keyboard and the google search would return ten examples against your stupid post

Then do so.

And will admit that I confused Thoreau with Mill, but his work was still referred to in such a manner. But, in all seriousness, the whole of American Transcendentalism is despicably feminine. That anyone could argue otherwise is more of sign that our notions of masculinity are nothing but a parody of what they were in a former time.

>>7044614
I was more thinking of Schoppy

>>7044615
That was a mere biographical correction and not an attempt at being contrarian.

>>7044624
oh ok nevermind then

>>7040763

>bukowski

what is happening to muh /lit/

>>7034836
>no two individuals share the same characteristics

>>7040842
>>>7034710
lol dude u mad brah no wonder you think only dudes can read Bukowski

Everyone gets the depression, man, depression has nothing to do with your genitals

>>7034653
>Know some women
>4 of them have read lolita
>3 didn't like it

Hmmm

>>7040763
Dude, not everyone is a sniveling beta like you.

>>7034755
i would take a screenshot of that but i'm using ubuntu so it's probably super fucking complicated and requites a shell command 120 characters long, but i did enjoy your post, i hope i remember it in ten minutes

>>7045519
Press alt +print screen you boob.

>>7034653
>all of them

>>7044543
this is the worst case of projecting I've ever seen on a Sri Lankan cartoon board

>>7044151
>words must describe the extreme of themselves
Let's put a moratorium on "slow" because people keep describing cars as slow, when they're actually very fast

>>7034653
>Palahniuk
>PK Dick

>Tolkein

>>7045647
I'm on mint and PrintSc alone works well enough. It dumps pictures in the /homedir/Pictures folder

>>7045489
then why are you on /lit/

lmbo at the buttmad faggots who got triggered by my post. This is how it is.

>>7045432

"Depression" is mealy mouthed garbage buzzword shit to get you to keep downing your soma and being content. Shut the fuck up.

>>7043634
You mean you're really not Evola Kid?
I will never be a mother or even parent probably.

>>7044422
Those are my words. (Just not my face. So many noobs ITT. HA) This guy >>7044475 is lying.

>>7044502
She appears to be living in an attic.

>>7044516
Compared to your abnormal need for lots of solitude, they're probably on average normal people.

>>7045804
It's just a word to describe an emotion, Mr. Edgyfuck. You stfu.

>>7045804
read the scientific literature. neural connections literally start dying in the depressed brain. fuck yourself.

>>7046134
i'm a psychologist you wanklord, i know how it works.

I'm not saying it doesn't exist, i'm saying it's not how you think it is. Let me guess, you think that some depression is a "chemical imbalance in the brain". fucking nice m8.

nothing is more disingenuous than modern psychiatry.

>>7045519
have fun being a useless tech-illiterate retard

>>7034685
Wittgenstein wasn't "poetic" he was precise in such a way as to illustrate the very points about language he was trying to make. He was no more poetic than you or I are in our every day speech and use of metaphor.

>>7045996

If you are really butterflyfag then perhaps you should wear the trip

>>7048193
It's like a hat

*Tips trip*

>>7045519
Why use ubuntu if you're afraid of learning how?

quality thread