[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 190 KB, 383x600, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

6945700

Anonymous Sat Aug 8 02:37:07 2015 No.6945700 [Reply] [Original]

>"This edition uses the revised 1993 text of Gabler's version"
What am I in for?

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 02:39:05 2015 No.6945707 >>6945700 You're in for the revised 1993 text of the gabler version

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 02:43:49 2015 No.6945725 >>6945700 >hmmm this is what I think Joyce meant to say >hmmm this is a better word than Joyce used Lots of this

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 02:55:15 2015 No.6945758 >>6945725 Pity. Should I bother?

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:00:54 2015 No.6945772 >>6945758 You can if you like, a better version is the 1932 odyssey press version, it's a revision but a very good one requested by Joyce himself

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:02:24 2015 No.6945778 >>6945725 I don't understand why people do this. Joyce would've made these revisions himself if he wanted.

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:02:59 2015 No.6945781 >>6945772 Is there a version of it I can find today?

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:05:27 2015 No.6945788 >>6945781 Wordsworth Classics use this version and you can get a paperback copy quite cheaply.

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:16:33 2015 No.6945809 >>6945788 Great. Thanks.

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:17:40 2015 No.6945811 >>6945781 >>6945788 >>6945809 I saw nothing :^)

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:19:10 2015 No.6945813 >>6945811 ??

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:21:19 2015 No.6945817 >>6945813 >being this new

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:24:54 2015 No.6945823 File: 35 KB, 313x500, ulysses.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6945809 Prepare to order this...

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:25:56 2015 No.6945824 File: 96 KB, 306x475, 338798.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I read this one, it is good right?

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:26:00 2015 No.6945826 File: 29 KB, 320x499, ulysses2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6945823 ... and then receive this.

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:45:59 2015 No.6945863 >>6945826 oh god

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:50:40 2015 No.6945871 >>6945826 ;_;

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 03:51:17 2015 No.6945874 >>6945824 I hope so. I specifically bought this one for that '90s Vintage cover, because I have so many books of theirs with the author's name at the top like that in the same font.

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 06:19:10 2015 No.6946135 File: 1.53 MB, 761x1169, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] How's this?

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 09:05:45 2015 No.6946457 >>6945826 meh same thing

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 09:09:50 2015 No.6946466 Don't worry OP, both versions are bad cause it's a gimmicky modernist novel ahhhheheh... ;_;

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 12:47:50 2015 No.6947088 File: 26 KB, 306x306, 1436720670675.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6946466

>>	doc brown. !khyINr9Fj6 Sat Aug 8 13:16:47 2015 No.6947195 >>6945725 why do people do this? i don't understand why you would alter a work like that

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 13:18:28 2015 No.6947203 >>6946135 I want to know, this is the version that's been sitting in my shelves mocking me for years on end already.

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 13:28:35 2015 No.6947242 File: 33 KB, 310x310, 0670068810[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] can any Canadafags tell me if this is good?

>>	Anonymous Sat Aug 8 14:58:40 2015 No.6947551 The best version is the 1960 revision. Perfect balance between fixing the errors and not editorialising overmuch.