[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 61 KB, 640x480, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

6901991

Anonymous Thu Jul 30 06:10:55 2015 No.6901991 [Reply] [Original]

Concerning Sartre's concept of being and non-being how does it apply to literary fiction?

If you consider a novel's reason for being a novel this means you place a set of values in the object. What does this imply for the analogious parallels you find in it? It means you think of the analogy as being too since you apply a meaning to it from judgement on what you think it relates to. Can this now mean that the analogy you conjectured from a state of non-being in evaluation of it is seperate somehow from the being or non-being of the actual non-anologious narrative? What I'm asking is, when you consider the analogy of a novel in a transcendent temporal non-being state, can you then simultaneously not consider the non-analogious content as non-being or a nothingness?

I would really appreciate help on this. I understand the analogy pertains to the novel but why would this fact imply that you can not consider them ontologically seperately?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 06:13:09 2015 No.6901993 dayum dat bitch fine af tbh

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 06:13:23 2015 No.6901996 File: 707 KB, 994x592, Cannot Brain Today.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6901991 Let me drink my morning cup of coffee first. I'll get back to this.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 07:55:28 2015 No.6902212 >>6901996 I'm still waiting for you Anon!

>>

Anonymous Thu Jul 30 07:59:53 2015 No.6902217

>>6901991
I suppose, but why is this bothering you? It boils down to "all shit can only be considered in context and by relation to our perceived world," and that's self-evident. All writing reflects and is dependent on/connected with language, culture, etc.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 08:11:40 2015 No.6902232 File: 60 KB, 1000x737, 1436986332780.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6901991 who is this sexual reproduction incantation?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 08:25:17 2015 No.6902260 >>6902232 Stop posting this picture please. I just can't handle it.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 08:27:15 2015 No.6902266 >Taking a picture of yourself naked with a book covering your books Why? It's not hot. It makes you look like a tryhard. If I were a woman I certainly wouldn't do that, and if my bf asked me to, I'd dump him on the spot

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 08:31:00 2015 No.6902271 >>6901991 Mein gott, this is so hot Sartre a shit

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 08:33:12 2015 No.6902276 >>6902260 handle what

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 08:35:41 2015 No.6902283 >>6902276 She's too cute. I can't bear it.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 08:41:56 2015 No.6902302 Alright, gonna get myself a ban.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 08:42:57 2015 No.6902307 File: 164 KB, 800x600, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6902302 1/2

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 08:43:58 2015 No.6902311 >>6902302 2/2

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 08:44:58 2015 No.6902313 File: 52 KB, 640x480, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6902311 kek, pardon me

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 08:58:44 2015 No.6902332 >>6902313 WHO IS THIS SEED OF LUST?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 09:08:09 2015 No.6902352 >>6902313 She got sartre nipples

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 09:11:42 2015 No.6902362 >>6902332 >right click >Search Google for this image faggot

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 09:13:39 2015 No.6902366 >>6902362 It was literally a repost on some French dude's Twitter.

>>

Anonymous Thu Jul 30 10:24:51 2015 No.6902601

>>6902217
Yes that generally is self-evident, but specific cases, like this one, generally aren't. And in understanding those specific relations we can gain an understanding of the subject in greater precision than what generalities offer which allows us to penetrate obscure subjects because, if for no other reason, it's intetesting. And in my personal case, it staves of loneliness.

>>6902266
But it is hot. And 'tryhard' is always a matter of perspective, I for instance think women wearing make up is tryhard yet most don't because it's a norm. Why are you really sore?

>>6902271
>Sartre a shit.
Elaborate.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 11:05:34 2015 No.6902769 >>6902352 Classic Sartre nips.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 11:11:29 2015 No.6902797 >>6902332 https://vid dot me/eKWg http://imgur.com/a/dOyOO

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 11:11:38 2015 No.6902798 here you go you lusty negro attitudes http://planetangas.com/hermosa-teen-amateur-en-fotos-desnuda-mostrando-sus-senos

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 11:15:18 2015 No.6902809 >>6901991 sartre is a faget more of the whore please

>>

Anonymous Thu Jul 30 11:22:51 2015 No.6902833

>>6901993
>>6902232
>>6902260
>>6902271
>>6902302
>>6902283
>>6902307
>>6902313
>>6902332
>>6902769
>>6902797
>>6902798
>>6902809
It's a weird feeling when you derail your own thread with nothing but the opening image. I saved all the linked images and videos.

And what does /lit/ have against Sartre?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 11:45:41 2015 No.6902931 >>6902798 since we're at it, http://www.poringa.net/posts/imagenes/2723138/Teen-muy-loquita-en-la-webcam.html

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 12:38:19 2015 No.6903179 I won't lie I just came with the video where she puts a whole school's stationary in her twat.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 12:48:09 2015 No.6903214 I KNOW you guys have read Being and Nothingness, I KNOW you guys are browsing /lit/, I KNOW you have interest in it otherwise you wouldn't have read, so WHY don't you come and sit down so we can converse about it? Yes I'm talking to YOU.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 12:51:48 2015 No.6903230 >>6903214 Sorry, but I've only read Nausea.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 13:01:48 2015 No.6903267 >>6903179 >>6902833 what vid?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 13:06:14 2015 No.6903282 >>6903179 WHERES VID FAM

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 13:10:35 2015 No.6903300 >>6903267 >>6903282 INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 13:11:17 2015 No.6903302 >>6903267 >>6903282 See: ... Oh the post got deleted. Get it her while it's hot! And before alertness reaches the bot! https: //vid dot me /anonnonmeys

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 13:12:52 2015 No.6903312 File: 949 KB, 200x113, TL DR.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6901991

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 13:16:35 2015 No.6903330 >>6903312 >too long; didn't read >on a board where you're expected to read things that are too long to read Can you help me pinpoint the contradiction?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 13:20:31 2015 No.6903349 >>6903302 kek why cant i see a single thing on the page? gotta have na account? whats vid dot me anyway. i feel like a spoonfeedin cunt

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 13:21:56 2015 No.6903359 >>6903349 I assume it's just some clickbait since the post hasn't been deleted

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 13:22:15 2015 No.6903364 >>6903349 Close the gaps. Replace 'dot' with '.' -- there you go, granted your imbecility doesn't interfere.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 13:52:28 2015 No.6903505 >>6903330 On a board where you post a sexy woman as your image.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 13:54:51 2015 No.6903519 >>6903214 I've read it but I'd much rather talk about what has been in her twat tbh

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 30 14:01:26 2015 No.6903538 >>6903214 >why did you lead off with this image Bad move OP, restart in a day or so. Always kick off philsoophy threads with a title of the book so not to attract plebs