[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 64 KB, 720x540, 1429189105973.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6820155 No.6820155 [Reply] [Original]

>Show, don't tell.

Does any one actually agree with this piece of advice?

>> No.6820163

>Quiet as kept

I'm partial to this one myself

>> No.6820173

Generally, yes. But do what you want.

>> No.6820258

Applied best to the visual arts.

>> No.6820331

>>6820258
Really? Go watch Paris, Texas.

>> No.6820347

As long as you're not being redundant.

>> No.6820420

>>6820155
It's pretty dumb and usually the people who use it don't know what they mean by it. They seem to think it means don't be descriptive, and if you have to describe something do it though labored analogy.

It was meant to champion the break of the novel from journalistic (ie Dickens, or Melville, or Shelly, or even people like James) patterns of fact-relaying to more impressionistic ways of writing where the author presented experiences before the reader decontextualized.

The phrase is antiquated, it should be something like "create something witnessable, don't report what your narrator witnessed,"