/lit/ - Literature

Who is this semen demon

>>6813281
every god damn time

who is this spunk monk

>>6813281
>>6813294
>HerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerpHerpDerp

See what you did wrong OP?

>>6813278
i could give you those texts, but first i will need a higher resolution version of the picture in your post. for scientific research, you understand.

who is this ejaculatory receptory

too much distraction I can not OP so sorry err....

who dis seed m'leed?

>>6813278
who is this cum plum

>>6813278
who's this bead to speed

>rubbing coke on clits is a good idea

tadpole abode
WHO
DAT
BE

Who's that seed fiend

WHOS THE FUCKIN BITCH

never change

Who is this fair bear?

who is this bang womang?

Who is this grease piece?

Who is this fluid druid?

/lit/ has the best classic blunders. I feel like people do it on purpose as a form of shitposting, because it always follows the same template of "boring question that no one knows the answer to on a topic that no one knows or cares about" with "picture of handsome woman with high-brow feminine aesthetics".

hips don't lie

t. fucker of females

Who is this boner condoner?
Who is this jizz djinn that I see?
from the window of my den
cuck-a-doodle doo I hear her coo
a fuck-u-thrice cockatrice dancing away the night
begging me to
let her in
my residence
this gentle succubus suck n' buss my lips my nose filled with her sweet musk oh please OP just tell me this angels name before i cream myself in shame

>>6814059
you deserve to be truly proud of yourself, you poet you.

...Has anyone tried tineye?

>>6814059
a new meme form appears

>>6813278
>Could someone give me some texts on distributism?
Les Miserables.
Never heard of it called that (w/e) This is socialism, leftism, OP.
And why do you think it doesn't seem practical? It's immensely practical. Fire the loafer at the top of the totem pole, bingo, you save tons of cash for your business. Get every employee involved democratically (no not on every issue, duh) Fostering not just equality but democratic participation, which will heal the ills of politics. Again IMMENSELY PRACTICAL.

>>6814077
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism

>>6814033
I'm new here, what exactly does 't.' signify?

>>6814065
she was the best slut in /fa/

and she was a good meme

>>6813278
it is small scale capitalism and it is shit. it will lead to fascism. it completely misunderstands marxism so in it's typically Catholic (I say this as a Catholic btw) way, it rejects it.

>>6814077
distributism is not socialism sadly. it's class collaboration with "voluntary worker co-ops"

>>6814104
fuggin newfaggud :DDDD

t.Spurdo

>>6814129
It's class collaboration superficially, but in actuality it really isn't, since it requires every worker be given the means of production of his own. So there could theoretically be a capitalist class, but it wouldn't be there in practice, because the workers don't need a capitalist class, they have their own means of production (which is appropriated from the capitalist class)

>>6814129
It's a stepping stone towards a better world. Frankly it would be coming rather late even if it rushed up on us in the next few years.

Switching hips. Only two I know of.

>>6814129
Not really, distributism is more reminiscent of the pre-capitalist guild system or corporatism, where people collaborate based on occupation rather than economic class. It's basically democratic corporatism, instead of fascist. It's also unworkable in the modern world, just like georgism, gift economies, communism, anarcho capitalism or any other fringe economic theory.

>>6814319

muh test

is this the high test thread?

>>6814490
It's actually not unworkable at all. It would come with a massive decline in productivity, but probably an increase in quality. The technology doesn't have to revert, it's just that everyone would have their workshop in their home. So instead of assembling cars in factory, you might specialize in making certain parts and you negotiate agreement with other workers to put together cars. Or you might just sell the parts to other workers.

>>6814530
doesn't sound post-scarcity

>>6814077
>>6814319
do lesbians even care about hips? i thought only men did, for evolutionary reasons

Still no texts on Distributism... and i'm not even OP

>>6814534
It's not. From a theological perspective, it would make more sense to have less stuff that's meaningful, rather than trying to fulfill consumerist heaven.

>>6814319
>Only two I know of.
Scratch that.
Sana Sadiq

>>6814539
Oddly enough.
I like a lot of things personally.

>>6814541
Gar Alperovitz's books.
And I said Les Miserables.

>>6814539
everyone cares about hips and ass
>pop evo psych reasons to find the human body attractive
>>>/out/

>>6814503
>>6814503
>>6814497

WHAT THE FUCK DOES HIGH TEST MEAN

ITS A TYPE OF PETROL

ITS A TYPE OF PETROL

>posts attractive semen demon
>gets upset when people ask who it is

the ol' "don't post a picture more interesting than your post" meme

>>6814065
>>6814067
>being this new

>>6814980
i'm not in every thread mate
but yeah should've checked the archive
looks like some genius cooked that up first time in january

>>6814991
>i'm not in every thread mate
or indeed any thread for the past year

>>6814994
my interest fluctuates

>>6813278
Who is this dick dock?

>>6815037
Sana Sadiq

>>6815073
dem thighs

>>6815073
More like Saka Madiq, noam saying?

>>6814104
It's the abbreviation of "terveiset", which is "regards" in Finnish.

t. /int/

>people who unironically ask for the name of meme hot girl images

These are the same sort of people who feel guilty after jerking off, detest fake tits, and consider the thought of paid sex repulsive on the basis that the other person is faking it.

They literally cannot stand it if it isn't "real" enough for them. In spite of this, they inevitably ask for the name of the girl and then they inevitably, INEVITABLY, end up at a photogallery consisting mostly of the girl posing in front of a mirror with a camera, at which point the viewer inevitably thinks "hurr durr what an airheaded slut" (because, again, none of it is "real" enough for them), losing all interest and forever destroying whatever fantasy (and it is precisely with these people that the fantasy will always be more seductive for them than the real thing) was still possible with the initial image.

Don't fucking tell me it doesn't happen, don't tell me I'm just projecting because I don't have this problem. I've been here almost a decade, and I know how people's minds work on this website.

>>6815788
I just deeply enjoy making up variations on semen demon to be honest.

>>6815791
please go to /b/ and never leave

>>6815788
Thanks, Anon, now I feel ashamed, because i'm forced to let my sexuality free hand and masturbate.

>>6815788
It's weird that people get elitist about what porn they spank it to.

>Oh, I don't watch that 'staged' shit, I watch the amateur stuff and cams. It's more real.

Why do people hold this opinion? You're scrubbing your privates in the darkness of your bedroom to fleshy electronic stills and you're trying to maintain some kind of purity? As if exaggerated sex noises and fake orgasms have never occurred outside of professional porn. These same kids thumb their noses at cheesy erotica, but isn't that what they're trying to construct in their heads? A scenario where it happens "naturally".

>>6814497
WHO
IS
THIS

>>6815791
joke's on you i just like to read my own writing

>>6813278
who is this jizz djinn

who is this man sauce shift boss?

>>6815917
I really, really, really like this image.

>>6813278

Who is this solution to the ejaculation equation?

>>6813278
Who is this wiener cleaner?

>>6815808
semen demen poetry is authentic lit lore

>>6813278
Who is this genitalia generator?

>>6813278
who is this smart tart?

>>6813278
who is this lube dude?

>>6813278
who is this strumpet cum-pet?

>>6813278
>labor theory of value
>2015

>>6816889
1. Distributism hasn't anything to do with the LTV

2. If I refine a diamond and it is worth more, what's the one variable that went into it? Labor

>>6813278
Who is this banger aptrgangr?

>>6813278

Can someone give me texts on HOW TO FUCK THIS BITCH?!

>>6813278
no but can you give that lady's name?

>>6815958
lmao

>>6814994
Ha what a fag right??!?

>>6815837
Maybe some people find it hotter you autist

What the hell is the deal with distributism lately? I've seen several people proscribing to it recently. Ffs, it's the catholic alternative to socialism without any of actual theoretical groundwork or applicability. Is it just a thing among left-leaning rightists who will proscribe to anything as long as it doesn't actually call itself socialist?

>>6815788
who is this cum mum

Who is this wenie genie

who is this impregnation proclamation

>>6817181
No, it's quite different from socialism, because it recognizes the psychological benefits and incentives that come with property ownership--pride and responsibility.

The Tragedy of the Commons is real.

>>6813278
>this doesn't seem practical.
it's not practical whatsoever.

but that won't stop upper middle class white academics from trying to espouse feel-good garbage about the emancipation of the working class from their ivory towers.

>>6817349
Explain how it isn't "practical".
Anyone?

>>6817181
>without any of actual theoretical groundwork
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation

It really is baby steps to the left. You all know I'd prefer the end of capitalism, but this would be very beneficial

>>6814686
it means that hyperfeminine women are found attractive by men with high levels of testosterone.

bitchmade niggaz like boyish stick figures and such

legit love you lads

>>6817181
capitalist shill detected

Who is this up-chuck buttslut

who is this orgasm phantasm

>>6818249
No, he's right.

t. communist

>>6818335
what does "t." mean?

>>6818212
This post was brought to you by Broscience, Inc™

>>6818378
>what does "t." mean?
>>6815784
>It's the abbreviation of "terveiset", which is "regards" in Finnish.
>t. /int/

>>6816928
>2. If I refine a diamond and it is worth more, what's the one variable that went into it? Labor

This is so retarded. If I pick a diamond up off the ground with minimal effort, does it have less market value than a fat turd I laboured to eject from my anus?

>>6813278
>tfw pic not related is more triggering than the discussion

>>6818932
Triggering what exactly?

>>6818400
LTV is based on socially average labor, not the labor for every individual product

>mfw liberals dismissing Marx's theory as ridiculous without even knowing it

>>6818939
muh phallus

>>6813278
who is this derogatory term for sperm?

>>6818939
>she will never wrap her legs around you while calling you an infidel

i want her to crush my dick between those hips

>>6818942
It is ridiculous, because there are many natural resources that have high value without any labor being put into them whatsoever.

>>6814503
>confirmed
high test thread now

/lit/ has good taste in female anatomy

Ass>Hips>Thighs>Tits

>>6819636

Oh shit, sauce me up?

>>6817215
>socialism mean none owns anything
>yet still the tragedy of the commons (a phenomena that critiques private exploitation) apply
So you've just confirmed that you don't know what socialism is, congratulations - please come back when you can actually forward a argument grounded in reality.

>>6820215
That's exactly what socialism is, apart from the "tragedy of commons" nonsense. Even with the relatively new idea of exceptions for "personal property", you still can't personally own the means of production or land or housing.