[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 825 KB, 976x960, fetish.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6796342 No.6796342[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Is there only mysticism left after stirner, like Schopenhauer said there was only mysticism after his philosophy?

>> No.6796352
File: 8 KB, 235x218, 1001709_541722672531234_985514244_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6796352

>>6796342
>floor tiles
oh shit i remember

>> No.6796354

>>6796342
>fetishism
>pornography
Disgusting.
>>6796352
Admittedly a hilarious read.

>> No.6796365

>>6796352
>>6796354
I'm gonna need a floor titles explanation sorry

>> No.6796381

>>6796342
>tfw irredeemable
welp only one direction to go now I guess

>>6796365
some guy (possibly on /v/? - I can't remember) posted a story about how he had a fetish for floor tiles; posted screencaps of his folders of categorised tile pics and shit. I swear I had a screenshot of it saved but I can't find it

>> No.6796383
File: 2.41 MB, 1600x8500, DowgNSg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6796383

>>6796365

>> No.6796394

>>6796342
Why is obese considered ascended?

>> No.6796422

>>6796383
Does anyone have the vertical of the guy who masturbated to geographical lines, or something along those lines.
That was some deep-tier stuff.

>> No.6796426

this list is shit

>> No.6796428
File: 370 KB, 1235x777, floor tiles related.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6796428

>>6796383
>googling mexican sugar dancing

>> No.6796434

>>6796342
>cuck not in degenerate

jewish propaganda

>> No.6796438

>>6796394
Why wouldn't it be you disgusting degenerate

>> No.6796442

>>6796342
>anal
>shemales
>not normal

I can think of nothing more normal than tranny porn. It's certainly what I watch the most of.

>> No.6796445

>>6796383

>you geometric slut

Damn this whole post is gold.

>> No.6796453

>>6796442
Great logic. Anal is somewhat normal, yes, but shemales certainly aren't. Just because you watched some, it doesn't make them such.

In fact, you're an abnormal faggot.

>>6796342
Concrete enema sounds fun. Are they supposed to be removed or not?

>> No.6796455

Where are diapers on that chart?

>> No.6796456

>the tiles
God damn

>> No.6796458
File: 12 KB, 233x251, 1431279964922.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6796458

>>6796442

>> No.6796459

>>6796453
Shemale porn is some of the most popular porn out there. Look it up.

>> No.6796460

>>6796342
>Watersports
>not normal

>> No.6796467
File: 51 KB, 670x472, 1432043727344.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6796467

>>6796460

>> No.6796469
File: 176 KB, 422x208, 1436270042032.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6796469

>>6796460

>> No.6796490

>>6796460
what the fuck

>> No.6796492
File: 67 KB, 585x400, 1412435538723.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6796492

>>6796460

>> No.6796504

>>6796342
Glad to see femdom isn't too weird.

>> No.6796525
File: 476 KB, 520x595, 1425420292995.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6796525

>>6796383
LITERALLY hal incandenza

>> No.6796536

>>6796525
what.

>> No.6796541

>>6796342
That's a really bad listing.

How is Incest so high? It's basically normie as hell.

Lolicon, Pedophilia and Obese should be much lower and Amputee and Cuckold should be a decent amount higher.

>> No.6796546

>>6796541
>how to spot the guy who wants to touch his fat underage daughter: the post

>> No.6796570

>>6796342
I only get off to softcore
Where does that out me?

>> No.6796571

>>6796570
Next to floor tiles

>> No.6796592

>>6796383
Magnificent

>> No.6796645

Incest is way too far down. It's a total normie fetish.

>> No.6796665

>>6796460
Normal on every board except this one.

>> No.6796686

>>6796342
What is "Mexican Sugar Dancing"?
I dont want to google it.

>> No.6796690

>>6796342
>Feet
>normal

Fuck off you gross retards

>> No.6796702

>>6796570
Me too.
PIV is fucking feral.

>> No.6796705

>>6796690
>>6796686
Shitting on tits

I just googled it and there were no pictures, only UD definition

>>6796690
Feet are the most common fetish ever, though.

>> No.6796713

>>6796705
>Feet are the most common fetish ever, though.
Maybe on 4chan, but in not in the real world

>> No.6796724

>>6796713
it's the most normie fetish to exist, on 4chan or not, and if you have another contender for it, what would it be?

>> No.6796735

>>6796713
Several celebrities are known to have it, and it's certainly the one people are most aware of

>> No.6796757

>>6796383
>tiles

I just....

I don't even...I...

.....

>> No.6796787

>>6796757
It might all be an act, but a highly creative act nonetheless.

>> No.6796858

>>6796724
>>6796735

It should still be swapped with anal. Yes 'feet' are a very common fetish, however it's still a fetish, more people will try anal at least once in their life than would ever try a footjob. The majority of people find feet disgusting.

This is coming from a foot fetishist.

>> No.6796869

>>6796858
hi5 bro.

>> No.6796874

>>6796858
>>6796869

if a girl loves u she'll be more then happy to try a footjob as long as you're not super weird about it don't u worry bro's.

>> No.6796880
File: 10 KB, 244x250, 1421054812558.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6796880

>>6796342

> anal is weird
> dp is normal

Also, I always thought I was really fucked up, but according to this peer-reviewed scientific chart, the most fucked up thing I enjoy is just "weird" (bukkake). More than six years lurking in this Hell Hole and I'm still pretty much normal it seems.

>> No.6796905
File: 7 KB, 250x242, CEMy-pQUUAAQLJK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6796905

>>6796459
>>6796453

>tfw you realise you just blew your load to a tranny.
>it wasn't even amateur shit
>it was naughty america for fuck sake and someone just forgot (or didn't) to tag that it was trap.
>you only find out because you decide to check more of her videos..
>tfw it's not the first time that it's happened.
I'm into latinas with heavyset features so maybe thats were i'm going wrong but still. damn.

>>6796858
foot jobs are fucking weird, but i think a lot more people would be willing to suck or have their feet sucked

>> No.6796957

Lel anal is normal as fuck

>> No.6797019

>>6796342
does anyone have this image, but with authors/books?

not sure if it's exactly like this, but it's a similar idea

>> No.6797119
File: 602 KB, 728x2680, 1431719547848.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6797119

>>6797019
I know there are vidya and music versions, but I'm not sure if there's a lit version... Pic related is close, I guess.

>> No.6797153

>>6797119
>Lolita even close to IJ
Goddamn how bad these guides can get

>> No.6797159

>>6796757
perfectly reasonable orientation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_sexuality

>> No.6797190

>>6796342
>genital mutilation
>weird
>at least one in four men has mutilated genitals

>> No.6797196
File: 1.43 MB, 2592x1936, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6797196

>made there has been literally 0 (ZERO) responses to the OP yet

>> No.6797197

>>6797119
Anyone know the best translation of Borges' Labyrinths?

>> No.6797218

>>6796342

>Includes floor tiles
>Forgets about women thinking of dog knees

>> No.6797226
File: 56 KB, 560x812, 1436199209132.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6797226

fucking hell you newfag, don't you know you should never post an image vastly more interesting than the topic?

>> No.6797303
File: 855 KB, 770x1215, 1432068120431.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6797303

>>6797226
Now he does

>> No.6797636

Somebody add >>6797490 to the OP pic

>> No.6797640

>>6797303
So how does this work. Is the level of my highest entry my level? Or do I need a majority?

>> No.6797650

>>6796342

>feet
>normal
>no sounding

Also I think the word you're looking for is 'descended'.

>> No.6797652

>>6796342
>incest with the rest of that disgusting shit
oh fug off

>> No.6797740

>>6797640
No idea tbh

I guess you pick the deepest one

>> No.6797803

>>6797119
not that one...

this one's is supposed to be funny i think

i remember "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" being like, the lowest one or something

>> No.6797826

>>6796342
this labeling is only caused by capitalism alienating people

>> No.6797957
File: 568 KB, 785x3593, bY7vA.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6797957

>> No.6797969

>>6796342
>dat pic
where is "girls contemplating dog's elbows?"

>> No.6798006

>>6797969
this is my fetish

>> No.6798021

>>6797957
how credible are these?

>> No.6798129

>>6798021
Extremely. Sydney Lumet is obviously much more sophisticated and less accessible than Godfrey Reggio

>> No.6798170

>>6798021
Not at all.
Being foreign and/or being old doesn't maker a film inaccessible (assuming you aren't a retard.)
Ozu and De Sica are easier to get into than Herzog or Cronenberg.
Also Barney is not a filmmaker.

>> No.6798186

>>6797119
how is Under the Volcano Hard Mode? I'm about to read it but I never thought it would be hard.

>> No.6798188

>>6797957
I don't think Eisenstein should be level 4. While an average viewer today might hate a b/w, silent movie with no protagonists, from the perspective of early 20th century, he'd be level two.

>> No.6798192

>>6798021
they are jokes

>> No.6798213
File: 459 KB, 585x946, toptext.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6798213

>>6796880
Saved.

>> No.6798246
File: 52 KB, 645x320, 4735529.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6798246

>>6796342
>this chart