[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 107 KB, 906x804, butterfly.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6778764 No.6778764[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

There is any good book with a net-idol protagonist?

>> No.6778782

>posting our aunt when there are so many newfags around to harass and molest her
consider yourself exiled from the /lit/ oldfag club

>> No.6778790

>>6778764
2qt4me

>> No.6778809

>>6778782
she has dropped the board long ago, so who cares?

>> No.6778843
File: 99 KB, 377x350, 1431587408147.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6778843

>>6778809
If by "long ago" you mean "by the end of this summer" than yes. Who cares?

>>6778764
Idoru by Gibson was kind of like this.
Stories set on the net, even partially, sound rather dull. Might want to look up short sci-fi stories. Anolog and the like.

>> No.6778904

>>6778843
Nice try, but everyone knows that the tripfag is a dude with a short video of butterfly (he makes the pics from it). The real butterfly has left /lit/ 1-2 years ago

>> No.6778924

>>6778904
So the "real butterfly" never even met Feminister?

Was I still a moderator though, or did that rumor start up even earlier?

>> No.6778934 [DELETED] 
File: 218 KB, 964x1090, 1346642928834.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6778934

>>6778843
dang, why are you leaving? I don't give a shit if you're the "real butterfly", but whoever's posting under that name these days is one of the only good namefags /lit/ has

i'll pour a 40 for you

>> No.6778938
File: 62 KB, 866x326, 1429998030621.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6778938

>>6778924
>So the "real butterfly" never even met Feminister?

Yeah, which is even funnier when you think that Feminister was a man as well.

>> No.6778944

>>6778843
You never said if you wanted to see that creepshot I took of you, butters.

>> No.6778951

>>6778938
>yfw feminster is butterfly and Rei and Tallis

>>6778843
will miss you butters. I hope you have a nice life. aren't you over 30?

>> No.6778958
File: 26 KB, 535x239, c4MOOqx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6778958

>>6778938
wrong pic

>> No.6778964

>>6778843
I've noticed you in this board enough that if you're the person in OP's picture, I will sincerely consider devoting myself to you. I will dedicate this novel I'm working on to you who maintain the hope of finding a girl who will whisper excerpts of Kierkegaard and Stirner just loud enough so I can barely hear as she sits on my face.

>> No.6778968
File: 37 KB, 641x482, butterfly12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6778968

>>6778924
c'mon, everyone with a butterfly folder can be butterly

>> No.6778987

>>6778964
Oh please don't. I'm lesbian and not into Kierkegaard.

>>6778968
Anyone who's done it was always to make me look like an ass. Big reason I'm not posting more.

>> No.6778990
File: 61 KB, 960x640, B0jerbdCYAAhL0Z.jpg-l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6778990

>>6778968
>everyone with a butterfly folder
>people have butterfly folders

>> No.6778991

>>6778924
>Was I still a moderator though, or did that rumor start up even earlier?
Butterflaps was never a mod, she became a janitor and stopped posting with a name. The butterflaps symbol was resurrected a month or two later by a British guy who posted for a while, then the torch passed to someone else, and now whoever you are is the current butterflaps.

The very first butters was a radical feminist and staunch atheist.

>> No.6779004

>>6778987
will miss you butterfly, you were my favorite tripfag, even though we disagree about a lot of things, I enjoyed our conversations.

>> No.6779008

>>6778991
>The very first butters was a radical feminist and staunch atheist.
I'm in love.

>> No.6779014

>>6778991
I was never mod or janitor. I know why it seemed so, but I'm not telling.

I'm still an atheist though, and a second wave socialist-feminist. (Though still an anarchist at heart)

We may be a different person from morning to night, but I am the consistently her.

>> No.6779020

>>6779014
Do you not want to see my creepshot of you? At the very least it would help you know where to avoid in case it happens again.

>> No.6779026
File: 44 KB, 642x481, butterfly10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779026

>>6778990
>Butterfly was our queen years ago.
>Then people started to impersonate her
>She was frightened and left
>A tripfag dude has proclamed himself butterfly
>he began to repost the same old pictures of butterfly
>newfags started to drool behind him
>no tripfags have start to be butterfly
>here we are

the only good thing is that she doesn't know any of this

>> No.6779033

>>6779026
no I came back and saw, I just don't care

>> No.6779036
File: 106 KB, 768x768, 1430408852251.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779036

>>6778990
>he doesn't keep a folder on every tripfag

>> No.6779041
File: 70 KB, 640x480, 1391022692741.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779041

>>6779036
newfags

>> No.6779047

>>6779041
That's not her.

>> No.6779048
File: 181 KB, 937x734, Banned for nothing again.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779048

>>6779026
I adopted the trip when I and the impersonators got banned.

I still prefer to go without, as you can see.

>>6779041
That's not even a litizen

>> No.6779050

>>6779014
>I was never mod or janitor. I know why it seemed so, but I'm not telling.
It seemed so because butters stopped posting hours after the new wave of janitors were instated, and after saying that she was applying to be a janitor. Then the board was subjected to a horrific few months of obvious left-wing feminist tyranny.

>We may be a different person from morning to night, but I am the consistently her.
Sure. You range from an American Bjork loving Hitchens fan-girl who wants to demolish the patriarchy to a misogynistic English libertarian.

>> No.6779051

>>6779020
What?

Where?

>> No.6779053

post one timestamp before you leave

>> No.6779055

>>6779050
>>6779048
>english
what's the story with the drunken englishmen who impersonated her for a while?

>> No.6779056 [SPOILER] 
File: 21 KB, 640x480, 1436043565065.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779056

>>6779048

>> No.6779058 [SPOILER] 
File: 893 KB, 1456x2592, 1436043636213.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779058

>>6779051
Here! See?

>> No.6779063

>>6779055
>the drunken englishmen who impersonated her for a while
he was the best butterfly

>> No.6779064
File: 92 KB, 446x693, 1332738920600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779064

>>6779050
>a misogynistic English libertarian.
That guy sucks. Haven't seen him drunk-post in a while.

>>6779055
Just an annoyed drunk rightwinger.

>>6779056
I know who that is. I like her though she must be a handful

>> No.6779067

>>6779058
Cute.

>>6779063
Arse.

>> No.6779068

>>6779064
>I know who that is. I like her though she must be a handful
how is ended?

>> No.6779077

>>6779064
>she must be a handful
She's pretty skinny, I'm guessing both of them together would barely be a handful.

>> No.6779081

That's it. If butterflies leaving, I'm going too. /lit/ just wouldn't be the same without you honey.

Goodbye everybody. Bye butters.

>> No.6779091
File: 138 KB, 1000x1000, 7206-1749434313.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779091

>>6779081
>newfags think that they can leave

>> No.6779097

>>6779068
Howawhowhat?

>>6779077
I mean she's bipolar. Lit didn't like her literary tastes and we drove her away. ( ._.)
I liked her a lot when she first started posting on /b/ though. Very entertaining. She read children's books to us.

What do you mean "both"?

>> No.6779101

>>6778904
is this real

>>6778764
i'm almost certain someone has written at least some fanfic of rose

>> No.6779110

OP here, what happened to my thread?

>> No.6779115

>>6779081
End of summer is the plan. I need to concentrate on other things. Recreational computer time is bad for people.

>>6779101
>is this real
Not at all. well, the pictures came off of a cam but there's no video

>>6779110
>>6778843
>Idoru by Gibson
>>6779101
>some fanfic of rose
Sorry.

>> No.6779116
File: 95 KB, 959x720, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779116

>>6779110

kek

>> No.6779119

>>6779097
>What do you mean "both"?
I was making a joke about boobs.

It's a shame that you're leaving. I'd want to stay in touch but I can't imagine you'd be up for that.

>> No.6779129

>>6779101
>some fanfic of rose

you bastard, now you've made me remember rose

>> No.6779133

>>6779129
no brakes on the rose train

there's new pics btw. like from this year

>> No.6779137

>>6779081
I miss Sunhawk and Satan.

>> No.6779138

>>6779133
whaaaaaaaaat?

>> No.6779144

>>6779137
I miss kitty (ironically) and deep and edgy

>> No.6779146

>>6779101
there are 3 short videos,
1 butterfly dressed in orange
2 butterfly dressed in green and black (no bra shows pink panties)
3 butterfly in plaid shirt

>> No.6779155

>>6779146
why did she even make those tho?

>> No.6779156
File: 118 KB, 960x425, Ody.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779156

>>6779146
What about the various robe shots?

>>6779133
Don't do that to us, anon.

>> No.6779160
File: 35 KB, 500x375, bane-shower-drain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779160

>>6779155
Hell if I know. *Attention* you all insist. But you gave me attention with just the name.

>> No.6779162

>>6779155
"She" didn't make them, they're some recording of a girl. It's probably a recording of a girl actually camming (hands free) and then someone screenshotting or taking stills from it.

Did people not know this? There were people who thought Butterfly was really that mannish girl all this time?

>> No.6779164

>>6778904
this, pathetic tbh

>> No.6779165

>>6779156
I don't have them yet

>> No.6779172

>>6779156
lol. does the original butters symbol entered in the name field still result in a ban?

>> No.6779175

>>6779172
Never did.

>> No.6779177

>>6779172
let's see

>> No.6779182

>>6778991
>Butterflaps was never a mod, she became a janitor and stopped posting with a name.
The original butterfly also got triggered when anyone called her butterfly and insisted she was called K.

>> No.6779186
File: 726 KB, 391x288, 1431546172324.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779186

>>6779177
>tfw you realize using butterfly name results in dubs

>> No.6779188
File: 36 KB, 640x481, butterfly17.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779188

>>6779182
this

>> No.6779193

>>6779156
>>6779138
yep. i wish there wasn't, but somehow someone found her appearing for a split second in a video showing some gig of a shitty screamo band. there's also a pic that's like a year old that someone took when he saw her on a sidewalk in london, side walking along

>> No.6779198
File: 17 KB, 223x218, Screen Shot 2015-07-04 at 23.31.48.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779198

>>6779175
vabloSIE sounds a bit like bourgeoisie tbh

>> No.6779201

reading this thread has made me sad about current lit

>> No.6779209

>>6779182
I didn't care to be called anything. Back when I was still avoiding the sex question. (Ironic that you're now insisting on the reverse. Laughing) At the time the characters didn't even look like a butterfly to me. It grew on me. I don't really care.
>insisted she was called K.
Wha-? Like Kafka?

>> No.6779213

>>6779177
>Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ
That's not the original symbol. It had two antennae dots like this one: Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ but it was slightly asymmetrical on the lower wings.

>> No.6779221

>>6779201
You know what, I even prefer the thread where they shat on that youtube dimwit to this

>> No.6779229
File: 15 KB, 335x363, Close thread mockup.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779229

>>6779201
I feel like this about a lot of threads.
More and more of them.
Another reason I'm planing to leave.

>>6779213
It looks different with other font settings. I see the umlaut antennas on both your posts

>> No.6779239

>>6779229
>>6779209
>not butters original trip
>even if it was, it isn't secure
Just stop posting.

>> No.6779241

>the original butterfly probably was a real girl
>she hasn't been here for years
>her life has whole new exciting phases and stories to it now
>you're still here talking about her

>> No.6779256
File: 49 KB, 450x360, 1381263727988.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779256

>>6779193
I'm already feeling my old sickness overwhelm me

>> No.6779259

>butters will never be your literary gf who you discuss books and drink tea with.
>you will never adopt a cat with her
why live?

>> No.6779274

>>6779239
I have had only one. No trip is secure, but someone posted in another thread so I put it on mid-thread.

>>6779241
Okay. Sounds good.
Maybe I'll be able to write some stories for you all (That is the vague plan)

>>6779259
;_; Don't be like that.

>> No.6779276
File: 39 KB, 768x182, Picture 30.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779276

>>6779229
>I see the umlaut antennas on both your posts
All three look different to me. The original butterfly symbol, on my screen anyway, used to have the two dots and a circle on the lower left wing.

>> No.6779283

>>6779256
well, if you're really curious, you can head over to "8 chan dot net/rose", get your fix :^)
MWAHAHAHAHAHAH

>> No.6779285
File: 117 KB, 700x774, aiden_ivanov.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779285

>>6779274
Farewell butters,

I will remember the good times and the laughs we had on /lit/. I wish you success in your ventures.

>> No.6779287

>>6779274
>No trip is secure
Yes. There is such a thing as a secure tripcode. Any other tripcode can be broken very easily with a searcher.
>but someone posted in another thread so I put it on mid-thread.
Mhm, whatever you say.
You wouldn't mind posting a timestamped picture to further authenticate your internet persona, would you :)?

>> No.6779289

I routinely shitpost namefagging as butterfly and outis.

>> No.6779290

>going through the archive to find original butterfly
>back in early 2011 original butterfly is talking to REI, Quentin, and D&E in the same thread
>4 fucking years ago
>4 years pass and people are making identical posts on an identically shitty board
>the exact same jokes exact same meta exact same discussions

>> No.6779292

>>6779274
are you leaving? why is everybody talking like you're leaving? please don't leave

pls

pls

>> No.6779298

thread theme song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egY8rUpxqcE

;_;

>> No.6779305
File: 284 KB, 1208x786, Banned for on topic thread.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779305

>>6779276
Like I said, it turns up different depending on the fonts used by your browser settings and website. You see this on warosu?

The name came from a Zalgo thread, and is jammed with all sorts of accents treated differently depending on the fonts.

>>6779292
>are you leaving?
I'm planing on it by the end of summer. I need to do other things with my life.
>>6779290
>4 fucking years ago
I KNOW O_O

>> No.6779306

>>6779298
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOVkYAxHvkk

>> No.6779309

>>6779305
Don't ignore me.
>>6779287

>> No.6779315

>>6779309
he's not an idiot, he can't post timestamps

>> No.6779316

>>6779305
Please do leave
Both for the board's sake and your own

>> No.6779318

>>6779305

this doesn't seem on topic in the slightest.. i do it for free but i must do it. i have no tolerance for attentionwhores

>> No.6779403

Honest question Butters: Who do lesbians like dildos so much?

Aren't lesbians supposed to like to be penis free? Isn't using a dildo some sort of 'admitting defeat'?

>> No.6779413

>>6779403
they love the benis but are afraid of the man

>> No.6779452

>>6779403
These kinds of questions are asked on /lgbt/ all the time.
Many if not most lesbians don't use dildos or strapons. They don't need to. What you're seeing is bisexuals in pornos. Men (some that I've read on /gif/) can't stand realistic lesbian porn with no toys or scissoring. They need to see the cock of it ruins it for them. So the industry puts them in everything labeled "lesbian" (I cringe when I see them suck on them. So stupid)

But dildos and vibrators are not penis, and those that do enjoy them are simply comfortable with their sexuality enough to do so.

>> No.6779465

>>6779452
That's the worst possible answer. Whatever, respond.
>>6779287
You aren't a fake, are you :)?

>> No.6779484

>>6779452
>They need to see the cock of it ruins it for them.
Can confirm; I don't feel like getting off until I see some penile penetration. And know you what? I'm okay with this.

>> No.6779489

>>6779287
>Yes. There is such a thing as a secure tripcode.
Yeah? W/e. Never looked into such a thing.

>>6779465
>the worst possible answer
Why's that? No details about what I put up mine?

>> No.6779493
File: 147 KB, 357x320, Screen Shot 2015-06-05 at 18.27.21.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6779493

>>6779403
>Isn't using a dildo some sort of 'admitting defeat'?
i dont get it (your question)

manfags also buttfuck each other, can't change the way your sexual organs are made, gotta work with what you have

>> No.6779502

>>6779452
>Many if not most lesbians don't use dildos or strapons. They don't need to.
Got any citations for that? Seems reasonable though.

>Men (some that I've read on /gif/) can't stand realistic lesbian porn with no toys or scissoring. They need to see the cock of it ruins it for them. So the industry puts them in everything labeled "lesbian" (I cringe when I see them suck on them. So stupid)
I fucking hate toys both in straight or lesbian porn tbh. Plastic pieces of shit. Lesbians humping each other toolless are best lesbians.

>> No.6779504

>>6778764
>There is any good book with a net-idol protagonist?
>>6779452
>But dildos and vibrators are not penis, and those that do enjoy them are simply comfortable with their sexuality enough to do so.

This is why I hate you

>> No.6779510

>>6779493
>gotta work with what you have
That's kind of my point. Fags fuck each other with their own dicks. Needing artificial accessories is sort of admitting defeat. "I like women but I need this artificial dick" seems kind of silly.

>> No.6779514

>>6779182
>and insisted she was called K.
cringy asf really

>> No.6779516

>>6779452
It feels like a major let down when there's no dick. And by that I mean I can watch two naked girls getting it on. But if there's no dude with a penis I don't want to jerk off. I wish I knew how to justify this to myself not that I care.

>> No.6779529

>>6779516
yer a fag laddie

>> No.6779542

>>6779502
>No citation are kept in this archive.
I like to see the solo girls vibrate themselves silly.

>>6779504
I answered the OP. One of two to do so. What've you got?

>>6779510
>admitting defeat
There is no defeat. I love women. The majority of lesbian sex is done with mouth and hands to pussy. Length means little.

>>6779516
Meh. I suppose if you prefer POV over BBC gang bangs there shouldn't be a problem.

>> No.6779651

I shitpost pretending to be Kolsti

>> No.6779671

>>6779542

>you sit on 4chan for years

>you're average looking

>Lesbian

wow surprise. wonder where you went wrong in life. so sick of seeing you in threads.

>> No.6779680

i'm glad butters is gone, do people still not have that new dude filtered?

>> No.6779682

>>6779542
>There is no defeat. I love women. The majority of lesbian sex is done with mouth and hands to pussy. Length means little.
I see, but surely you get what I mean? If lesbian sex was generally artificial phallus oriented then that would demonstrate lacking phalli.

>> No.6779715

>>6779542
Time stamp yourself and gg