/lit/ - Literature

you don't need to tell them anything

>>6736324
just fucking tell them

>>6736324
So who are you going to vote for?

>>6736341
nobody!!!

>>6736341
If you don't vote bernie sanders you're a pleb tbh

Tell them you're voting for Bernie Sanders, obviously.

Unless you're wealthy. Then say Hillary Clinton or whatever Republicunt fox news is hyping.

>mom, dad, you two are clearly uneducated simpletons with no culture and that's how you raised me so really it's your fault

>>6736346
If you are bored and disgusted by politics and don't bother to vote, you are in effect voting for the entrenched Establishments of the two major parties, who please rest assured are not dumb, and who are keenly aware that it is in their interests to keep you disgusted and bored and cynical and to give you every possible reason to stay at home doing one-hitters and watching MTV on primary day. By all means stay home if you want, but don't bullshit yourself that you're not voting. In reality, there is no such thing as not voting: you either vote by voting, or you vote by staying home and tacitly doubling the value of some Diehard's vote.

>>6736346
>Implying individual anarchism has to do with not exercising your political power

If you really want to walk the walk throw a pipe bomb into your local bank, don't jack off on 4chan about forfeiting your already nearly inconsequential rights like a literal pleb.

Just tell them you're a man of principal and don't believe in tactically voting for a candidate you'd rather shoot than endorse just to stop a guy you hate marginally worse getting in.

It's easy to be an anarchist when you're living comfortably in the First World.

>>6736324
Muh gud

If you are really a stirnirist you would just vote for the one that served your immediate interests best shithead.

>>6736404
If you say this without going out and taking shots at your local political office you're full of shit.

Why is it that no one exercises their 2nd amendment rights anymore?

>>6736399
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma

>>6736399
Whatever flaws there are in our current democratic processes you perpetuate them a lot more by suggesting that there's no structural problems to be found in it and it's really just a question of getting the right people in than OP does by not voting

>>6736324
Just move to Alaska if you want to be an anarchist.

The people there are livin the dream.

>>6736399
That wasn't me. I'm voting for Bernie

>>6736415
I'm not an American tbh.

I pooed on the Conservative club car park last election if that counts.

>>6736423
I wish I didn't have a criminal record tbh.

This is what I get for listening to Renzo Novatore.

Still don't regret it.

>>6736423
Those people are cold, dark, lonely, and poor.

>>6736424
>Bernie
that ideology tho

>>6736484
sniff

(Expected value of chosen candidate winning - expected value of opponent winning) x (Probability of casting the deciding vote) ~= 0

Voting is retarded.

>>6736324
Tell them all the campaigners are asslicking fuckoff bastards

>>6736484
>This whole thread
I'm not surprised by the Sanders shilling, but I am surprised at the unanimity.

>>6736385
>>6736424
>>6736484
>>6736509
People seem to forget that Obama talked exactly like Bernie Sanders is in 2007

>>6736521
People don't seem to start with the Greeks

>>6736521
Yeah but what else is there? Hillary?

>>6736548
I'd vote for Liz Warren over Hillary tbh.

>>6736551
Liz Warren isn't running, though. There's no serious indication, anyway.

>>6736424

Fuck off kike

>>6736521
No he didn't. Obama never promised Scandinavian socialism, he always bowed down to corporations

>>6736584
>Implying his campaign didn't make him out to be the herald of a new era

>>6736521
The different is Sanders has been consistent through his career. He's still a liberal though even if he's a Progressive Left-Liberal.

>>6736589
Of social justice and pot legalization. Never promised economic socialism

>>6736584

>Scandinavia has a socialist economy

Holly shit why are Muricans so dumb and clueless?

>>6736614
Scandinavian socialism does not equal socialism

>>6736324
>mom, dad, you've raised a sociopath

>>6736602
>>6736593
Our point is that you're making a big deal out of something that will probably disappoint you.
>Proudly socialist President
>Conservative Congress
>MUH GUNS, MUH JOB CREATORS
>No bills get passed
>The government stops functioning to an even greater degree
>Civil war in the worst possible scenario

I know you chucklefucks like revolution but it isn't actually a laughing matter.

>>6736324
>individual anarchist
Too spooky already to be honest. Ideological affiliation is for mongoloids.

>>6736628
Than what do you call someone who agrees with Stirner? Egoist?

>>6736617

It isn't socialism at all. Income redistribution is not socialism. Besides Scandinavian societies aren't as successful as edgy murican redditard kiddies think they are.

Btw I bet the people who think Scandinavia is socialist are the same oneswho make fun of people who call Obama a socialist. The irony is hilarious

>>6736634
The same people who think Scandinavians are strictly socialists are the same people who call Obama a socialist

>>6736324
>anarchist
anarchism as such is not a form of "government" or "power", it's a state between chaos/downfall and the creation of a government.
there is and has ALWAYS been a certain group of people that will finally hold the power and anarchism will no longer be, it's as simple as that.

>>6736633
No. Egoism generally has different connotations than Stirner's philosophy.

Why be so desperate for an -ism?

>They say of God, "Names name thee not." That holds good of me: no concept expresses me, nothing that is designated as my essence exhausts me; they are only names.

Stirnerist if you must, I guess.

>>6736614
>>Scandinavia has a socialist economy
Scandinavia is as socialist as it gets, norway is a bit less compared to sweden and finland though.
what you consider lefties or socialists are considered the right wing in sweden.

>>6736647
>market economy
>as socialist as it gets

read a fookin book m8

>>6736647
>norway is a bit less
Read a book. You don't know anything about these countries or socialism.

>>6736649
>read a fookin book m8
I have a masters degree in economics and I spent two years studying and doing research in scandinavia, I really don't think that I could find more information about the current state of scandinavia by reading a book. oh and yes, I have read a lot of books.

>>6736642
I don't think you know what anarchism is, look at revolutionary Catalonia or the Ukrainian free territory.

>>6736665
>I studied bourgeois economics so I know about socialism

>>6736413
tbh it probably serves him best to stay at home and masturbate

Just want to point out that anyone responding to

>>6736399

is an excerpt from DFW's nonfic piece on McCain's presidential campaign

I found a rare Stirner for you guys.

>>6736665
If you think Scandinavia is as socialist as it gets you literally don't know what socialism is.

/leftypol/ thread anyone?

Tell them whatever they want to hear until you're in the position to crush them.

Nice thread, made me look up Sanders. Pretty cool of to actually use the s word about himself, considering that's a scare word in 'murica.

>>6736584
>scandinavia
>socialist

top kek

>>6736649

Scandinavia isn't socialist, but socialism doesn't preclude market economics.

>>6736805
nice, saved.

>>6736324

"Ma', Pa'. Am ah retard."

>>6737009
My favorite anarchist philosopher.