/lit/ - Literature

Because no one here is talented enough to sell out.

>>6732039
She's 22.

Those pictures just went up, so you clearly follow him on social media. So, either you're a fan, in which case stop pandering to /lit/ so you can fit in, or you actively dislike him AND follow him on social media, which is kind of sad.

>>6732039
He never fucked Cara or Shaleine lol, he's probably got a gross wife who treats him like the beta that he is

>>6732039
>hates aristotl
>likes aqinase

wut?

this is shopped right?

>>6732070
No. They have a video together on YouTube as well

>>6732053
How is John Green beta?

>>6732044
10/10

>>6732044
this

>>6732080
Skinny pussy obsessed with political correctness, doesn't seem like he embraces masculinity at all.
As well two of his male protagonists are weak shy nervous but smart kids who don't approach girls but are wondrously approached by them. These characters are clearly based on john green

>>6732039
>>>>>>>out

>>6732093
>wondrously approached by them
aside from all the other bullshit in your post this stood out the most
0/10

>>6732044
goddammit

this tbh

>>6732039
yikes look at her fivehead

>>6732116
It's because her hair is pulled back so much. Have you ever spent any real time around women?

>>6732093
masculinity is a spook, maybe he is just politically correct because it benefits him the best as he has a love for other people

>>6732123
this

>>6732123
>as he has a love for other people
This has nothing to do with political correctness. If you had love for other people you wouldn't act as a tyrant about what they're allowed to say and think.

>>6732135
So he sound give himself a bad name and publicly shunned. I'd like to know what he is incorrect about by the way?

>>6732093
>doesn't seem like he embraces masculinity at all
sounds spooky!

>>6732116
>jealous female detected

If you don't think Cara Delevingne is gorgeous then you can, like, you know, buzz off, or something.

>>6732135
>it's bad to act as a tyrant about what people are allowed to say and think
>but if somebody doesn't fit my regressive unrealistic stereotypical idea of masculinity then they aren't a real man

>>6732148
I never said he was incorrect about anything, my post was a general comment. I don't follow John Green closely enough to know or refute what he says.

>>6732162
I'm not that other guy.

I read something after googling john green and he got accused of being a pedo or something like that, in a throwaway and obviously made up way. Jesus christ, he's playing with fire if he thinks he can be male and embedded in tumblr / youtube / over-sincere youtube culture. He should leave while he's still unharmed.

>>6732135

Yeah! We should all be freedom-loving reel human beans!

So what if I want to say nigger or fly the confederate flag? Stop calling me a racist and trying to police my behavior. I ain't harmin' nobody!

I can say and think what I want

>>6732171
Then what's wrong with being politically correct if you aren't stifling the true in the process?

Wait is he fucking Cara now?

>>6732205
The existence of this post actually supports your position, but not in the way you think.

Not like I'm going to defend Green's writing, but maybe he's politically correct because he doesn't want to talk about issues that would require you not to be PC?

I have no idea how can someone be both capable of introspection and be a liberal (I'm Swiss, I'm using the political term just to give you an idea of what traits I'm talking about)
If you're past your late teens that's just implausible, it doesn't really make sense. In the last couple of years I've been struggling to understand and explain to myself how that feature would ever be able to live together with a rotten ideology, and yet I found no other reasons besides:
- Clothe themselves of intellectual majesty and (faux) good intentions
- Naivety

What do you think?

>/lit/ is for the discussion of literature. If you want to talk about politics, go to /pol/.
Hang yourself

>>6732330
What traits ARE you talking about?

Maybe you guys just aren't /tv/, but Cara D. is trying to break into film lately and she's just the main protagonist of Paper Towns.
She's also in a comic book movie (Suicide Squat).

Also, I take it John Green is 6'2''++?

>>6732343
- Inability of realizing what words like "equality" and "tolerance" mean alone, and when applied to a society
- Inability of critical thinking and discerning politics and humanity
- Easily manipulated through cheap emotions
- Cowards, hypocritical, with no real interests for anything that their modest emotive sphere couldn't handle
- Advocating for political correctness
- etc.

>>6732367
>>6732343
To summarize, in human terms: the light version of cat moms

>>6732367
>>6732371
This is on one end of the spectrum, and turbo conservatives are the other end. It may be hard to believe but both types of people exist.

Those living with/for ideology are faulty to begin with.

I've been with my fiance since she was 13, she's nearing 16 now.

If I wanted that, I had over 700 days to get it.
>>6732161
She's hideous.

>>6732044
Meh. I feel like my peers could write stuff comparable to Green in terms of quality. (I'm getting a PhD in a quantitative field)

There is a lot of luck involved in getting your first work published and liked. He had a pretty solid platform(maybe, idk much about his career trajectory) for success through his vlog, and he leveraged it by writing YA that his followers would buy.

>>6732053
Cara is gay and is dating St. Vincent.

>>6732384
Politically, I agree
But humanly, I will never, ever see someone advocating for love and tolerance as human, because it's clear he never found the time to think of anything more interesting about his condition
Big emphasis on "advoctating", eh

>>6732407
>never found the time to think of anything more interesting about his condition
This doesn't make any sense.

And nothing remains if you remove advocating.

>>6732419
The original point is pretty simple: have you ever met a man or a woman that is past 20 and both introspective and representative of common liberal ideologies?

Isn't that model chick banging st . Vincent / Annie clark?

>>6732116
>gets paid to be looked at
>implying she is ugly
pic related

>>6732436
We're getting to a different territory now. Since we're talking about multiple "liberal ideologies" instead of a singular "liberalism", you have to tell us what those ideologies are.
Reminder that if they cannot be concretely defined, they're not ideologies.

>>6732581
I listed them above.
Those aren't indicative of any political theory, nor are they to be put in a political spectrum; but they are indicative of the people that most identify with a set of vague ideas, dogmas, and ways of living that in turn are more easily associated with the left

>>6732367

> Inability of critical thinking and discerning politics and humanity
> Easily manipulated through cheap emotions
> Cowards, hypocritical, with no real interests for anything that their modest emotive sphere couldn't handle

Are you implying that large numbers of Conservatives don't also possess these traits? Replace "muh political corrrectness" with "muh traditions" and it's spot on. Average unintelligent people are just born that way.