[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 3.82 MB, 584x900, 8430331964_d17994fbab.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6725203 No.6725203 [Reply] [Original]

Alright, so I'm about 80 pages into the fourth book of the meme trilogy and I have to ask-
Why is there no detailed fucking?

The whole thing is about drugs anyway, it's very listless and existential and hedonistic. It seems like sex would fit perfectly, and would break up the monotony of drugs and more drugs.

>> No.6725212

>>6725203

GEE I DON'T KNOW MAYBE HAVING IT DESEXUALIZED IS PART OF THE POINT JESUS CHRIST LEARN HOW TO FUCKING READ

DO YOU ALSO GO ON TO /FIT/ AND TALK ABOUT HOW YOU LIFTED 5 LBS THE OTHER DAY HOLY FUCK GO AWAY

>> No.6725215

Have you ever see a Tao Lin sex scene? Trust me, you're better off without.

>> No.6725246

>>6725212

Go to bed, Tao

>> No.6725256

>>6725215
I have not. This is my first Tao Lin. What's it like?

>>6725212
You can argue that the main character not having sex emphasizes his lack of contact with things that matter in his life, yes. But it could be done in a way that is still awkward, sad, entertaining and meaningless. Just like the rest of the book.

>> No.6725295

I don't know if Tao Lin is good, but if he's a serious writer than there's a very good reason he won't describe detailed fucking: it's been done and overdone.

Sex shouldn't even be a subject of literary exploration anymore. Our culture is oversexualized to the extreme.

>> No.6725306
File: 98 KB, 972x537, 1402736672907.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6725306

>>6725295
>don't know if Tao Lin is good

Pic related is some of his writing.

>> No.6725327

>>6725203
i actually liked taipei
it wasn't an amazing book, but i found it enjoyable

>> No.6725334

>>6725203
>Why is there no detailed fucking?
I noticed this and I found it very refreshing
when I read 'and then we had sex in the dark for an hour' rather than a detailed description I was so relieved
pretty much this, unless you had something very specific to discuss

>>6725295

>> No.6725350

>>6725306
The writing itself actually looks... Good. Not brilliant, but pretty good. The sudden change to the first person in the ''You look sad, stop it. etc.'' bit was a very good idea.

>> No.6725356

>>6725327
>>6725350
pretty much the general opinion
Taipei was actually pretty good, surprisingly, and I have doubts if he can ever write something that good, or better, again
He seemed to be in a downward spiral for a while and now he's writing articles and publishing a shitty book for money, it seems

>> No.6725357

>>6725350
>The writing itself actually looks... Good.

Welcome to /lit/. The place was made for you.
In fact, take my spot. I won't be back.

>> No.6725390

>>6725357
What is wrong in that particular small section of writing?

I know Tao Lin might very well be shit like Murakami - when you get a small section of writing it looks good, when you read the whole book you see how shallow it is. But I see what's wrong if that small piece of writing.

>> No.6725394

>>6725390
>I don't see what is wrong in that small piece of writing

Fix'd.

>> No.6725400

>>6725390
>Murakami
>Shallow

oh christ, let me be free of these meme philistines

>> No.6725401

>>6725306
This book is so good.

>> No.6725407

>>6725400
tao is better than murakami

>> No.6725412

>>6725407
He looks like.

>>6725400
I read Norwegian Wood. Good writing, he's a competent novelist, but there's nothing in it. It's like the student of painting who learnt how to copy a Leonardo but can't paint a truly good work of his own.

>> No.6725412,1 [INTERNAL] 

have you read this, it's basically an entire story that is one sex scene http://www.nerve.com/fiction/lin/sexafternotseeingeachother

it's from 2007

>> No.6726094

tao lin isn't comfortable with sex tbh

>> No.6726395

Every post in this thread including mine were made by Tao Lin

>> No.6726426

>>6726094
He's a known sexual predator so that doesn't make sense

>> No.6726514

>>6725306

Eh I love Taipei but Richard Yates is a bore..