/lit/ - Literature

I prefer hardcovers because they're typically better made and easier to read. Especially larger books, paperback is hard to hold for extended periods of time.

I don't like reading on computers or nooks or anything like that. It's hard to get into anything like that.

>>6688545

Your momma didn't raise you right, op

itt gentrified faggots

Yeah paper backs are pretty challenging to hold. They're like, kinda bendy. Shit's a fucking ordeal

>>6688608
Structure is important

>>6688884
o ?

You can get a used hardcover copy of nearly any book used for $4 or $5. Literally no reason to bother with paperbacks. I'll take a decent condition hardcover copy for $5 over a $10 or $15 new paperback any day.

im the opposite i never liked hard covers, they are too heavy, their spines/edges stab you...and they are clunky to store and move around

really hate them actually
paperbacks are best
but for the most comfort i like my e-reader

>itt

Once again, how do you hold a hardcover if you have manlet hands?
Someone told me that using glasses case is convenient, is that a thing?

>>6688545
why would i spend money on a book i can't carry in my pockets?

i actually only like paperbacks because i bend the shit out of my books. in every direction.

>>6689479
This might help you a little bit.

>>6689546
thanks anon, currently i abuse my books, dog ears and all the sins; perhaps i should develop more respect for objects.

>>6689552
You can make some origami bookmarks if you make lots of dog ears. They're easy as shit to make and also look cute.

>>6689479
This. I like the "accessibility" of them, that you can bend them, dog-ear them, carry them everywhere and give them lots of use that shows that you truly love the book. Hardcovers are only good for cosmetic collections, in my opinion.

>>6688545
some just like it hard, thick, and rough

i prefer softcovers due to my sensitive anus