/lit/ - Literature

>But let`s go back: the problem with the other origin of the "good," of the good as the man of resentment has imagined it for himself, demands some conclusion. That lambs are annoyed at the great predatory birds is not a strange thing, and it provides no reason for holding anything against these large birds of prey, because they snatch away small lambs. And if the lambs say among themselves "These predatory birds are evil - and whoever is least like a predatory bird - and especially who is like its opposite, a lamb - shouldn`t that animal be good?" there is nothing to find fault with in this setting up of an ideal, except for the fact that the birds of prey might look down with a little mockery and perhaps say to themselves "We are not at all annoyed with these good lambs - we even love them. Nothing is tastier than a tender lamb."
>To demand that strength does not express itself as strength, that it must not consist of a will to overpower, a will to throw down, a will to rule, a thirst for enemies and opposition and triumph - that is as unreasonable as to demand that weakness express itself as strength. A quantum of force is just such a quantum of drive, will, action - indeed, it is nothing but these drives, willing, and actions in themselves - and it cannot appear as anything else except through the seduction of language (and the fundamental errors of reason petrified in it), which understands and misunderstands all action as conditioned by something which causes actions, by a "Subject."
>When the oppressed, the downtrodden, the conquered say to each other, with the vengeful cunning of the powerless, "Let us be different from evil people, namely, good! And that man is good who does not overpower, who hurts no one, who does not attack, who does not retaliate, who hands revenge over to God, who keeps himself hidden, as we do, who avoids all evil and demands little from life in general - like us, the patient, humble, and upright" - what that amounts to, coolly expressed and without bias, is essentially nothing more than "We weak people are merely weak. It`s good if we do nothing, because we`re not strong enough."

Is he right /lit/?