[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 64 KB, 720x610, _20150602_190031.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6628624 No.6628624[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

This is what tumblr has done to writing. Now white people think they can't write anymore.

>> No.6628627

>>6628624
Only if you're poor

>> No.6628632

check the catalog dumbass

>> No.6628639

>>6628624
If DFW and Franzen and Eugenides and Eggers and Tao Lin and Foer and etc. and etc. are taken into account, it seems white people can't write anymore.

>> No.6628653

>a site is one homogeneous opinion
fuck off

>> No.6628654

>>6628639
It seems like no-one can write anymore. Admittedly I don't keep up with contemporary lit and am talking out of my ass, but there's a reason classics are studied more than modern novels.

>> No.6628664
File: 13 KB, 292x300, $_35.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6628664

>>6628639
You're just upset that DFW rejects your snarky pseudo-elitism crutch that you use to bolster your weakened sense of self.

>> No.6628667

Any straight white male who gives a single fuck about what SJWs think of him is a fucking loser who will never amount to anything anyway.

>> No.6628668

>>6628654
Classics are relevant to time and the wealth of a following which, consequently takes time.

And tumblr is a joke, search the poetry tag for example. Why would a novel by a black author have any distinction in narrative / plot unless it racially segregates itself?

>> No.6628675

>>6628664
DFW is a joke. >>6626767

>> No.6628680

>>6628624
FEMINISM!

CUCKS!

SJW!

TUMBLR!

CUCKS!

WHORES!

ALPHA!

REAL MEN!

CUCKS!

BETA!

>> No.6628693

>>6628680
TRIGGERED!

>> No.6628696

>>6628624

The tl;dr of the reply in direct quotes is:

>write your own experience without denying anyone else’s or colonizing their stories

>you should do what you can to make sure your own perspective is not getting more exposure than it deserves – that you’re not taking up more than your fair share of space...because of your status as a white male, whatever you do write is easier to publish, all other things being equal...

>When the VIDA counts come out and multiple publications are shown to publish far more men than women (with the numbers for POC writers looking even worse), editors make excuses about their submission pools – they get far more submissions and pitches from men than women. Then people inevitably respond by telling women to write more, submit more, and pitch more. I think this is exactly the wrong response: Instead we should tell men to submit less. Pitch less. Especially white men.

>Read more books by women, POC, and LGBTQ writers. Make their experience a bigger proportion of your reading, and learn that way instead of by appropriating their voices. Then amplify what you love – recommend those books to friends, teach them if you teach, give them away as presents. If you edit a magazine, make sure you’re not overexposing white male authors, giving them too much space because it’s what you relate to. Even if you don’t edit or teach anything, you can promote more diverse authors to editors and teachers you know.

>> No.6628702

>>6628639
>Tao Lin
>white

>> No.6628703

>>6628624
>Now white people think they can't write anymore.
If anyone lets themselves be stopped by this kind of bullshit it's a good thing they don't go on. It's like when women complain about "boys clubs". Grow thicker skin and nobody will give you shit.

>> No.6628704

>>6628624
>implying that minorities haven't been systematically made to feel this way for literally ever
>implying that the what man who thinks this isn't an idiot who simply wants sympathy so he can hold onto his white superiority

>> No.6628706

bourgeois "progressives" are the worst thing in the world

>> No.6628707

>>6628696
>write your own experience without denying anyone else's

thank you, article writer. i really needed to know that piece of common sense

>> No.6628710

>>6628654
I blame photography for the downfall of good prose.
also trying to badly emulate hemingway

>> No.6628711

For me, whites are being feminized.

We can now no longer be real men, i.e. we have to use morals and feelings all the time. We cannot do essentially male things and have to take into consideration other people's feelings.

For me, this is degenerate. We are being feminized by cultural marxism, and no one seems to question it.

>> No.6628719
File: 430 KB, 664x874, rimbaud.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6628719

>>6628711
le fish hook meme

>> No.6628721

>>6628696
This is Ayn Rand-level self-parody.

>> No.6628724
File: 842 KB, 350x260, 1302656280770.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6628724

>>6628696
>you should do what you can to make sure your own perspective is not getting more exposure than it deserves – that you’re not taking up more than your fair share of space...

>> No.6628737

>>6628711
Speak for yourself, pal.

>> No.6628738
File: 5 KB, 200x175, stirner.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6628738

>>6628696
triggered

>> No.6628742

>>6628696

tl;dr stop trying to publish and read minorities but don't be inspired by their writing.

>> No.6628746

>>6628737
low test detected

>> No.6628748

Why are the people who most frequently claim to be against racism always such a bunch of racist self hating hypocrites.

>> No.6628755

>>6628748
POCs can't be racist anon, didn't you learn this in school?

>> No.6628760

>>6628748
bourgeoisie

>> No.6628761

>>6628748
Because they have low testosterone.

They're like women in that regard.

Morals and low test go together. You don't see ripped leftists.

>> No.6628767

>>6628654
>only a small percent of old novels are studied
>people like Le carre and pratchett will be studied in the future

>> No.6628769

>>6628761
>You don't see ripped leftists
lel

>> No.6628772
File: 140 KB, 900x1112, mievillechina01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6628772

>>6628761
you were sayin?

>> No.6628773

>>6628748
>Why are the people who most frequently claim to be against racism always such a bunch of racist self hating hypocrites.

Why are the people who claim to be anti-terrorist the ones engaging in "shock and awe", destroying entire city infrastructure, blocking roads, detaining people for decades without trial, and waterboarding or force feeding them?

Perhaps the DEA does a shitload of drugs.

>> No.6628778

>>6628772
You know that guy has a huge cunt?

>> No.6628782

>>6628772
lel

What do his legs look like again?

>> No.6628783

>>6628772
Mielville is a power-bottom.

Not saying a power-bottom can't be masculine, just saying it's probably not the "traditional" sense of masculine you stone age thinkers are talking about.

>> No.6628786
File: 366 KB, 533x800, rippedcommie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6628786

>>6628761

>> No.6628787
File: 162 KB, 516x728, selfie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6628787

>>6628654
say that to my face fagget

>> No.6628795

>>6628787
"Will Self" has to be one of the best pen names ever for a philosopher.

>> No.6628865

somebody needs to actually enforce this 'no /pol/ shit' rule

>> No.6628869

>>6628680
Hahaha epic my friend!
You here from tumblr as well? Now that School's out for a few months we have enough time to post here as well ;)

>> No.6628880

>>6628865
well it is about literature. don't blame people for pointing out craziness, blame the crazy people writing nonsense like this.

>> No.6628903

>>6628624
Which is perfectly true of the vast majority of white people. This should be our new white man's burden, to lead mankind as the first race that shuns mediocre writing, allowing only the best to be published.
Also
>this is what tumblr has done to writing
Tumblr hasn't influenced writing in any way whatsoever you retard, it's a website where oberweight teen girls share their diaries with each other.

>> No.6628935

>don't blame people for pointing out craziness

fuck off faggot, /pol/ 'points out craziness' on every board every minute all day erry day without end

>> No.6628974

What are these "white people"?
Sorry, I do not recognise race so I do not know what you are talking about.
The notion seems too right wing for me.

>> No.6629000

>>6628974
mfw race is a widely accepted concept in america while in europe it's fucking borderline nazi to even bring up the concept of being from different races

>> No.6629020

>>6629000
Checked, but
>mfw
>no face
You an Invisible Man, son?

>> No.6629027
File: 75 KB, 520x530, 7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6629027

>>6629020
This was his face.

>> No.6629039
File: 9 KB, 225x225, 1433156851452.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6629039

>>6629020
Have a rare pepe for your troubles

>> No.6629063
File: 36 KB, 417x327, 4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6629063

>>6629039
Are you a "Bionicles" fan?
I used to play a "Bionicles" game when I was a child where you play as the smaller water "Bionicles".
The main story is about a "Pelota" competition or some thing similar,
but you journey around this sort of water world finding things and the atmosphere is what makes it great.
I remember if you go too far you see this Shinto gates that block the way.
Do you know what I am talking about?

"Bionicles".

>> No.6629100

>>6628721
>implying ayn rand would not be a cool glass of water on this very topic

>> No.6629126

>>6629063
Yes, I am indeed a fan of Bionicles.
I owned them all when I was a child.
They put a new series this year, and I went to the toy store as a grown man and bought all the series.
The teen at the cash register asked if I wanted a giftwrap.
I said "No, it's for me".

>> No.6629149

>>6628869
DID YOU JUST

>> No.6629151

>>6628869
This is even more epic than his post. The summer meme is so fucking funny!

>> No.6629156

>>6628696
White people what the fuck are you doing?

>> No.6629162

>>6629126
>I said "No, it's for me".
Haha. That's great.
Maybe I will try it myself.

>> No.6629164

>>6628680
And here we have this dipshit trying to paint everyone who disagrees as some neckbeard who believes the alpha shit

>> No.6629180

>>6628624
As someone who is not white (Arabic) fucking white guilt is pathetic.

>> No.6629316

>>6628795
It isn't a pen name though, that's seriously his birth name.

>> No.6629334

>>6629180
Arabs are white though, and they have inherited a lot of guilt. Slaver scum.

>> No.6629353

>>6629149
I can't

>> No.6629362

>>6629316
Let's brainstorm pun names.
>D. Ferance

>> No.6629448

>>6628624
1) Not /lit/.
2) Don't be intentionally daft. The abundance of Whites in literature is purely a symptom of their control and dominance of market relations and, yes, this is a problem for literature as it is not incidental that most of them write boring, clichéd, or simply forgettable shit that only middle-to-upper-class Whites can eat up. Whites are on the whole the most (accidentally and unknowingly) sheltered group of persons on the entire planet, and those Whites have no real insights into the human condition or anything that makes literature that isn't mere entertainment possible. Look no further than the OP: any kind of criticism of them and their ancestors' legacy results in whole-sale black or white conclusions whose sole interest their their mental self-preservation, such as "so you're saying every single White person should just not even bother trying to write?" Even asking this question proves complete a lack of imagination, sympathy, and complex problem evaluation on the part of whomever is asking it. That person, indeed, should not be writing -- not until they're willing to actually dig deep and self-criticize, find something that hasn't been said and needs to be read. We don't need any more BEEs, Palhaniuks, Harrises, dystopian trilogies, scifi/fantasy romance series, Greens, "searing" post-post-modern poetry, whatever -- please just don't bother.

3) >hur tumblr
Ban yourself.

>> No.6629458

>>6628711

>We are being feminized by cultural marxism

le 'i havent readed a book in my life but i have an opinion because i know about these things' meme

>> No.6629549
File: 204 KB, 348x489, mfw school of resentment.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6629549

YOU WERE WARNED

>> No.6629568

>>6628761
hey, guys, i found the guy who has never stepped outside of his room!

>> No.6629617

>>6629448
underrated post

>> No.6629635

Anyone else getting a 4th century Rome kind of feel?

>> No.6629665

>>6629448
the only good post itt. now everyone close your eyes and imagine what /lit/ would be like if more people were like this

>> No.6629697

>>6628869
But we're here forever...

>> No.6629704

>>6629027
hhhhhnnnnnnggg
who is this pussy purveyor

>> No.6629721

>>6628624
well white men should never have written poetry, and definitely shouldn't do it today. less because of the fact that they're white and more just because they're males who probably stole the works of women to start and then extrapolated poorly.

>> No.6629727

>>6628624
One post to one twitter account is now "WHITE PEOPLE ARE INDOCTRINATED BY THE JEEEEEEWWWWWZZZZ"

What is this?

>> No.6629753

>>6629704
>allitteration
>not rhyme
my norse nigga

>> No.6629768

>>6629448
>Whites are on the whole the most (accidentally and unknowingly) sheltered group of persons on the entire planet, and those Whites have no real insights into the human condition or anything that makes literature that isn't mere entertainment possible

It takes a certain amount of hardcore prejudice to make such a patently false and blanket statement such as this. The problem most of /lit/ has with this kind of mindset is that it's only further dividing the public and the community as a whole. Perhaps I should only speak to myself, but the type of problem which persists with this white guilt mindset is that it creates a rift in the literate public which shouldn't exist. Most of /lit/ doesn't give a fuck if a work of literature is written by a man, woman, Jew, fag, etc. etc. If it's a worthy piece of literature, it will stand on its own merits. Disregarding works of literature based on a writers gender, race, or 'privilege' is the type of prejudice that the SJW crowd claims to be fighting against. In other words, it's pure hypocrisy.

If a work of literature is good, it doesn't matter what color or gender or sexual orientation the writer is.

Electric Literature is intentionally demonizing a whole demographic of writers based solely on their skin color, gender, and perceived 'privilege' and then automatically writing them off without regard to their merit as a writer.

If you can't see this you are functionally retarded.

>> No.6629806

>>6629617
>>6629665
Samefag, hopefully. That post is terrible.
>this is a problem for literature as it is not incidental that most of them write boring, clichéd, or simply forgettable shit that only middle-to-upper-class Whites can eat up
This is just wrong. The western canon is so abundant with genius and incidentally, literature takes effort, thus casting away the less educated.

>Whites are on the whole the most (accidentally and unknowingly) sheltered group of persons on the entire planet, and those Whites have no real insights into the human condition or anything that makes literature that isn't mere entertainment possible
Being sheltered from (not part of) yet aware of what goes on can be a good thing. For it is not the job of a writer to write grand events but to make small events grand. The former are entertainment and the latter are art.
Still, there is no cause of literary genius. Cervantes lost the use of an arm in combat, was a prisoner for five years in algiers, and spent 3 years in jail in Spain. Shakespeare had really nothing interesting happen in his life. They are both geniuses.
What is "insight into the human condition" from female and black writers? We are so oppressed? Maya Angelou and her type are godawful poets. Of course there is Ralph Ellison and Virginia Woolf and other examples, but they have similar insights to white males because race and gender has very little contact with the universal themes that literature addresses. The only thing the oppressed can write about better than the non-oppressed is about how oppressed they are. Is this the insight we are supposed to accept into the canon rather than Shakespeare?

How can you in your right mind possibly call other's conclusions black and white when you say of white males "most of them write boring, clichéd, or simply forgettable shit that only middle-to-upper-class Whites can eat up." Because you said most instead of all? Is that supposed to save you from the fact that all you are capable of doing is not only generalizing, but incorrectly generalizing.

Please, kill yourself. This applies to anyone who agrees with you. Your intellectual capacity harms the world, could spell the end of art. What do you have to live for, seriously?

>> No.6629815

>>6629768
>If a work of literature is good, it doesn't matter what color or gender or sexual orientation the writer is
Note how the poster you'replying to said the very same thing. The problem isn't that white people are overrepresented, the problem is that they flood the market with shit. Remove the shitty 90% of contemporary white output, you've solved 90% of what's wrong with literature in our day and age.

>> No.6629835

>>6629815
Please share with us these secret good female and black contemporary writers :^)

>> No.6629835,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>6629768
>>6629806
These posts are so fucking awful I actually have to reply in the archive.

>The western canon is so abundant with genius and incidentally
I'm think you're forgetting a couple of very key points here:
1) The Western Canon also accounts for something like .0000000000001% of all books ever written, never mind composed.
2) The Western Canon is not synonymous with "the White Canon" as a fair number of the works considered canon are written by people decidedly not White (like, say, the fucking Bible). Fuck man, if you actually consider literature based on whether the authors themselves would have even recognized themselves as "White", the number of White authors in the canon drops even further. Notice I'm not now nor have I ever stated "White people can't write". Control your emotions.

>Being sheltered from (not part of) yet aware of what goes on can be a good thing. For it is not the job of a writer to write grand events but to make small events grand.
"Being aware" being the essential word here. Also, you're completely wrong: it's the job of the author to write and to write well, whether writing about grand or small events. J. D. Salinger's Catcher in the Rye is a gorgeous little novel about the complicated inner life of a young man and it has a place in the canon because it is well written. The Fault in Our Stars is sad-porn entertainment and can easily be forgotten from history with no consequences. But lets be clear here: there's nothing particularly interesting about the sad life of a middle-class White boy/girl not-really struggling to make it in America. Both the mentioned books are about that, but only one of them is worthy of consideration. Yet again, it's not because Green is White, but it's because Green's book gives us nothing we don't get from the 99% of other White writers. Who fucking cares? What's amazing is that you idiots obsessively say completely retarded statements like "blacks only write about being black" when Whites are the ones so obsessed with themselves. I suspect you are unconsciously aware of this and that explains the projection, but I'm not a psychologist, I couldn't say exactly.

>Still, there is no cause of literary genius.
Yeah, exactly. Yet you go on to say:

>What is "insight into the human condition" from female and black writers? We are so oppressed?
Seriously kill yourself, pseud. Stop being an assblasted dumbass for two seconds; contain your white guilt; stop pretending to be an intellectual; realize you don't have to be this wrong, but you choose to be. Spend a few years reading and then come back before you decide to shitpost here again.