[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 140 KB, 1024x622, 37904854.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6530825 No.6530825 [Reply] [Original]

Who do you guys think it’s the most profound of all fictional characters? The one whose mind and inner life is most completely exposed (be it by his/her own words, or gestures, or the words the narrator makes about him/she, or his/her actions, and probably by the communion of all those factors)?

Try not to name some particular character only because you identify with him/her, or because you like the style of the author or creator. And don’t be servant to clichés and traditional opinions. Answer with sincerity.

Also: if you have the time, try to explain why you picked the name that you picked.

>> No.6530845
File: 458 KB, 800x454, 2012-01-13_image1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6530845

Hagbard Celine.

>> No.6530846

Leopold Bloom (Ulysses - Joyce)

t. Harold Bloom

>> No.6530850

>>6530846
I think this has to be the answer.

>> No.6530860

>The Cather in the Rye, Holden Caulfield
>Moby Dick, Pip
>Moby Dick, The Carpenter
>Moby Dick, Ahab

>> No.6530865

Hamlet

>> No.6531178

>>6530846
Funny, I would've said Stephen Daedalus from the combination of Portrait and Ulysses. A character who reeks of sad failure with no one to blame but himself.

>> No.6531198
File: 35 KB, 316x500, the unconsoled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6531198

ryder

>> No.6531216

>>6530825
underground man, maybe? but your first sentence doesn't line up with your second. a character can be profound without being totally exposed. in man underground, for example, we can never get to the bottom of things because it's told from his perspective

>> No.6531663

>>6531216
I think OP means that a character can be profound without being exposed, but would be more profound by being more exposed.

>> No.6531690
File: 209 KB, 784x564, Mantegna.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6531690

Why, Our Lord and Savior of course.

>> No.6531694

Would you gents mind overlooking a little writing of mine, as the thread caught my eye I realised it was an issue I've been coming across in my writing - that I rather show through telling, by narrative device, in order to merge the subjective/objective perspective into what could be called a weaving of perspectives so allowing the reader the freedom to judge the statements made as is, as opposed to having to decipher laborious details into meaning - it requires pre-participation, for the reader to draw on their own experiences upon meditating on the words, instead of being fed them like baby birds-- so would anyone mind having a look over a paragraph and telling me whether I'm way off the mark or what I could be doing to more involve you in the interpretation?

>> No.6531703

>>6531694

>>6502067

>> No.6531724

>>6531703

That's a fair enough redirection - I only asked here because the topic of the thread seemed related - that saying profundity of character can be relative to narrative style..and that is an issue I've been tackling the last few days.

>> No.6531732

>>6531198
Man, I need to reread that book

>> No.6531746

>>6531690
He got speared LOL

>> No.6531760
File: 197 KB, 700x1091, a howlin' good read.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6531760

>>6530825
cosimo piovasco, naturally

>> No.6531933

Leto 2 is a pretty complex character

>> No.6532054

in grade school i read jerry spinelli's loser, and related so intensely to the main character, and was so vividly immersed in his isolation, that i had a complete mental breakdown and cried for hours.

i didn't make it to the part where he is saved and the other kids start respecting him.

so i guess him?

>> No.6532103
File: 114 KB, 405x469, 453914234234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6532103

>>6532054
>Try not to name some particular character only because you identify with him/her
the trash levels are off the charts

>> No.6532148

Define profound. What do you even mean by this question?

Nonetheless my answer is Hamlet. Or one of Shakespeare's characters.

>> No.6532163

>>6530825
levin