/lit/ - Literature

Get a fucking haircut you goddamned hippie!

Because this board moves way too quickly, and is way too clogged with threads, right?

My advice to you? Do as your parents did! Get a job, sir!

>>652287
There's a board for Jews already: /new/

>>652293
He did, he's a lensegrinder.

ahahaha Lebowski!

>>652303

You're out of your element.

>>652285
r E Ｍ o V Ｅ Y Ｏ U r Ｉ L L Ｅ Ｇ a ｌ ｃ L ｏ N E Ｏ f ａ T ｃ h Ｒ i S T Ｏ p ｈ e Ｒ P o o l ｅ ｈ t T P : / / 8 8 . 8 0 . 2 1 . 1 2 / Ｉ S ｔ H e ｏ Ｒ Ｉ ｇ ｉ Ｎ ａ l F a Ｇ Ｇ Ｏ t

Separate boards for History and Philosophy would be pretty cool

what the fuck, philosophy deserves its own board. lump history with literature, i don't give a shit about genealogy.

Why? So we can demonstrate our lack of understanding on a brand new board?

Personally, i think /lit/ attracts decent discussions on philosophy. a board devoted to /phil/ would be redundant.

the reason why philosophy is discussed here so much is only partly the fault of threads destinctively set up for it.
Often the discussion in a truly literary thread levels down to a very basic argumentation, often resorting to philosophical thoughts to back it up.
A history and/or philosophy board wont change that.

>>652881

>implying philosophy involves understanding.

If we understood, there would be no need for philosophy, idiot.

>>652897

If you understood you would not be posting here, halfwit.

>>652906

U MAD??

>>652886

Agreed, literature involves tons of philosophy. Plus, since when is "Thus Spake Zarathustra" and the like not considered literature?

>>652287

Not interested.

>>653326
sawce plox

>>652287
Agreed.