[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 1.02 MB, 1899x1431, gendersgraphic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6490944 No.6490944[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Why can't women into philosophy?

>> No.6490950

Instinctual inclinations.

>> No.6490951
File: 88 KB, 857x1012, hannaarendtsudomenica16ye8-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6490951

>>6490944
excuse me

>> No.6490953

Narrower IQ bell curve.

>> No.6490954

majoring in philosophy is for sucks anyway

>> No.6490955

>>6490944
Why can't men into art?

>> No.6490958

>>6490944
Sauceuty

>> No.6490968

>psychology

Fucking mommy instincts... Schopenhauer would have had a good laugh at this.

>> No.6490973

All the philosophy students I'm friends with are female

>> No.6490975

>>6490954

>women don't do it
>therefore my culture demands me to shame it

Fantastic shit tier time to live in.
Mathematics is too I'm sure.

>>6490955

Making brochures for galleries and exhibitions isn't really doing art. It's oompa loompa stuff.

>> No.6490979

>>6490973
That's because you a cat

>> No.6490980

>>6490955
>Why can't men into art?
This is an oxymoron.

>> No.6490981
File: 262 KB, 2000x1000, 23.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6490981

maybe they just don't find it interesting. Its probably just a cultural thing

>> No.6490985

wtf is 'art and archaeology'

is that one major?

>> No.6490986

>>6490951
>>6490973

>muh anecdotes and exceptions

/lit/ can't address and interpret facts beyond its own shitty horizon. What else is new?

>> No.6490988

>>6490944
/R9K/-/POL/-HYBRID HERE

WOMEN CAN'T THINK
THEY ARE LIKE ROCKS, NO SUBJECTIVITY, NO CONSCOIUSNESS
THEY HAVE LOWER IQ
THEY ARE ONLY MADE TO BE SEXUAL PROPERTY OF REAL MEN
THEY ARE INHERENTLY INFERIOR AND CANNOT BE ETHICAL
THEY CAN'T THINK LOGICALLY AND RATIONALLY
THEY ARE EMOTIONAL AND CAN ONLY TALK ABOUT MUH FEELS

THEY CAN'T LOVE EITHER

>> No.6490999

>>6490988

This is all true.

Nobody told them to pick the most 'emotional' fields out there.

>> No.6491000

>>6490981
NO, MEN ARE INHERENTLY MORE RATIONAL AND HENCE CAN THINK PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHTS.

MEN ARE ALWAYS BIOGENETICLLY PROGRAMMED TO SOLVE PROBLEMS WHEREAS WOMEN ARE MADE TO RAISE CHILDREN AND BE A DISGUSTING HOLE FOR MEN TO JERK OFF INTO

WOMEN HAVE LIFE ON EASY MODE

>> No.6491004

>>6490988
>THEY ARE EMOTIONAL AND CAN ONLY TALK ABOUT MUH FEELS
>THEY CAN'T LOVE, EITHER

>> No.6491007

>>6490988
I don't understand reactions like this. It's the same fucking tactic /lit/'s boogeymen love to use.

>> No.6491009

>>6491004
NOT REAL LOVE. ONLY A SIMULACRUM

ONLY A MAN CAN LOVE, BECAUSE MAN IS AN ETHICAL BEING, WHEREAS WOMEN ARE LIKE CHILDREN AND INFERIOR

>> No.6491011

>>6490988
>>6491000
this... this is satire right?

>> No.6491012

>>6491000
>BE A DISGUSTING HOLE FOR MEN TO JERK OFF INTO
this had me laughing irl, so many implications, it's like the Koran.

>> No.6491019

>>6491007
BUTT BLASTED FEMINAZI DETECTED

>MUH FEELS

"SURELY IT'S JUST A JOKE, BECAUSE THE TRUTH OF HIS STATEMENTS ARE SO DEVASTATING TO MY PAROCHIAL WORLDVIEW THAT I HAVE TO DISAVOW THE POINTS HE IS TAKING UP"

FEMALE LOGIC EVERYONE

>>>/TUMBLR/

>> No.6491023
File: 22 KB, 584x252, philosophy timeline.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491023

>>6490951
excuse me

>> No.6491035

>>6491011
either satire, or someone who hasnt quite mastered the art of the caps lock key yet. either way, it doesn't seem a legitimate, articulate viewpoint.

I can't wait for the all caps reply accusing me of ad hominem!

>> No.6491041
File: 112 KB, 619x960, leave the lady be.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491041

>>6491019

How much pussy do you get when you go against unjust stereotypes about women?

>> No.6491042

Listen shitlord, I'm in an advanced post-phd philosophy course, and you can believe me when I say that every student here is female. Plato would never have existed without strong womynz backing him, just remember that.

>> No.6491044

>>6491035
>it doesn't seem a legitimate, articulate viewpoint.
MUH FEELS

>> No.6491045

>>6490944
Music performance maybe.

>> No.6491047

Because they realized that it's bullshit that doesn't change anyone's life whatsoever.

If anything, their distaste for philosophy should be admired. Trying to goad women into philosophy is a trap (for them).

>> No.6491049
File: 32 KB, 512x422, lol.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491049

>>6490988
>>6491000
>>6491009
>>6491019
Aha, brilliant - I'm fucking cramping! How he uses the all-caps and mimes '/r9k/-/pol/ hybrids'! A genius display in satire; you sure showed the irrationality and irreconcilability of these fools!

>> No.6491050
File: 91 KB, 550x1029, Spartan cucks.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491050

>>6491042

Most of Greek philosophy was done by gays, cucks and pederasts.
Not much has changed really.

>> No.6491051
File: 11 KB, 100x100, the face of shitposting.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491051

>>6491000
YES NIGGER
YOU ARE A FUCKING NIGGER
WE ALL KNOW THAT
LMAO KEK TROLLED LEL

>> No.6491054

>>6490944
AHA LOOK AT ALL THE STRONG PERCENTAGE OF PSYCHOLOGY AND ART MAJORS WHO ARE WOMEN. WHAT A SEXIST MAJOR. MEN CAN'T SUCCEED IN THAT FIELD DUE TO ALL THIS MISANDRY.

>> No.6491056

It's a well known fact that only caucasoid and mogoloid males of a superb IQ can into philosophy.

>> No.6491057
File: 25 KB, 251x377, 1430558700527.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491057

>>6490944

>it's a reactionary thread where they analyze the statistics on a basic level from something overly graphically designed to seem official and legitimate "all there is to know about the subject" presentation, full of language loaded to make you feel learned with smugness dripping from it

>> No.6491058

>>6491050
>Not much has changed really.
>implying Hegel, Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, or Kant were any of those things
Also, I would hardly call the Greeks "gays."

>> No.6491060

>>6491041
WOMEN WANT REAL MEN, NOT THE FEMINIZED FAGGOTS CREATED BY THE CULTURAL MARXIST JEWS IN TODAY'S SOCIETY.

IF THEY WANT FAGGOTS LIKE THAT, THEN THEY'RE DEGENERATE.
I ONLY GO FOR CONSERVATIVE ARYAN WOMEN AND TRUST ME, I DO WELL.

I DON'T BELIEVE IN MANY SEXUAL PARTNERS, BECAUSE THAT'S JUST WHAT THE JEWS WANT TO SUBVERT WESTERN CIVILIZATION AND DEGENERATE EVERYTHING.

THEREFORE DON'T LET WOMEN PRETEND LIKE THEY CAN DO PHILOSOPHY OR ART OR ENGINEERING OR ANYTHING WORTHWHILE.

THEY BELONG AT HOME, LIKE THEY ALWAYS HAVE. THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE EVOLUTIONARILY SUITED TO

>> No.6491062

IS DOING ALL CAPS POST ON /LIT/ A NEW FAD?
WE DBZ NOW

>> No.6491065

>>6491042
>>6490973

Your personal experience contradicts other sources?
Let's just listen to you instead about everything.

>> No.6491067

>>6491057
>'reactionary' is a buzzword I use which serves as a generic label of people who I deem wrong or morally wrong

>> No.6491069
File: 488 KB, 460x336, 1430333538249.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491069

>>6491060

>> No.6491071
File: 77 KB, 800x558, David_Jones_-_2003.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491071

>>6491057
>empty attack
>cool reaction pic
checked
let me do it too
>this is you

>> No.6491074

>>6491065
I can't even tell who's pretending at this point

>> No.6491077

>>6491067

No reactionary means "ill read naive fool who has gut reaction logic" and I think that not only exemplifies the infographic you posted, but you as well.

>>6491071

I am a strong black bull with a cock ten times your size. Nice ttry.

>> No.6491079
File: 11 KB, 300x300, 1410108201128.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491079

>>6491056

My philosophy professor was one of the cooler fedora-lords I've ever met. When I first walked into class I asked him why he was wearing slippers, a kilt, and a fedora with pins of anonymous and child-free movemnets, he was super chill about it.

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Philosoraptor is a /lit/-fag.

>> No.6491081
File: 82 KB, 1197x535, Major-Gender-Distribution-Classes-2012-2014-30-Size-Depts.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491081

>>6491057

>this statistic is the only one I've ever seen on the subject so that makes it suspect at best for me

You really are the biggest dumbass I've ever seen tripping on here.

>> No.6491082

>mathematics

Great, pretty much the most useless subject of expertise.

>> No.6491085

>>6491077
Don't you ever get tired of being angry?

>> No.6491093
File: 97 KB, 850x565, nigga what.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491093

>>6491081

>mfw girls love to study spanish because "hawt guys"

>> No.6491101

Women tend to have a hard time with highly theoretical subjects, preferring concrete and/or interpersonal ones.

>> No.6491108

>>6491101

An actual decent reply next to "nice tipping fedora faggots" and "useless study anyways" replies.

Why is /lit/ such a kneejerk leftist shithole these days?

>> No.6491111

>>6491108
>memes are for leftists

>> No.6491118

>>6491111

>silly caps are now a meme

And I thought we were all about dankness.

>> No.6491122

>>6491111
Are you implying that rational thinking is not the hallmark of right-wing thinking?

Go to /pol/, we only have evidence and rationality. .jpegs, infocharts, alternative wikis etc.

>> No.6491126
File: 82 KB, 499x497, 9f9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491126

>>6491085

I never get tired of mocking losers, ironic or not.

>>6491093

>tfw

>>6491081

>see these statistics...that's all there needs to be said about the subject...yeah...look at this graph....fucking owned...yeah

Bruh read Arthur, it might improve your level of reading comprehension.

>>6491101

>the implication of god

>>6491108

>implying hard
>implications everywhere
>implications out the wazoo

>> No.6491133

>>6491126

How do you filter tripfaggots again?
Everytime this chinless shit adds nothing to the conversation and his jokes aren't even funny, nor his memes of a rare kind.

>> No.6491140
File: 254 KB, 1198x506, pol.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491140

>>6491122
>Go to /pol/, we only have evidence and rationality

>> No.6491142

>>6491081

HAHAHA fucking psychology

even worse than my major, art.

Or better, if you're a serial killer looking for young female victims.

>> No.6491145

>>6491108
an actual decent reply would be "why are you asking why they can't, rather than why they don't" you fucking shill

>> No.6491148

>>6491140
fuck off mudslime paid off by jews

>> No.6491149

>>6491126

>4chan is filled with losers xD
>has 10 tabs of threads open at this very moment
>ur all losers

>> No.6491155

>>6491133
Go to top right of page, click settings.
Then click filters and post hiding.
Click the check on "filter and highlight specific ..." with "Enable pattern-based filtering" under it.
Click the 'edit' button next to it. Put his trip in the list that appears, and make sure the 'type' is set to tripcode and the action is to hide it.
Confirm everything.

>> No.6491157

>>6491133

I consider going the extra mile and fully killing yourself before someone irritates you again.

>>6491142

The Modern Man

>>6491149

>

>4chan is filled with losers xD

Anyone can post on 4chan with an opinion, it's my assumption that the level of accesibility combined with the level of babied "gifted" boys grown in our generation promised the world, the population of 4chan is either deluded trailer trash with smug sense of superiority or ignorant and ill read young men who cannot for the life of them admit they have a a bloated sense of security/ worth/ etc.

I'm not wrong. Especially the reactionary tribes that inhabit 4chan tend to be deluded and totally in ignorance of science.

>>6491148

You are the product of inbreeding. I feel sorry for you.

>> No.6491164
File: 11 KB, 244x242, will smith.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491164

>hey anons, I wonder why women don't pick philosophy as much on average? I hope we can have an insightful talk about this

>KV /r9k/ pls go
>caps
>flip burger degree
>BDSM Frenchfaggot derailing
>back to /pol/

This board is only good for suggesting books.

>> No.6491169

>>6491157

For someone who calls himself Foucault you do realize the whole notion of a "loser" is reinforcing capitalism?

>> No.6491170

Shouldn't you be more concerned with how bad you are at basic logic, OP? Your declared major doesn't set the limits for your knowledge.

>> No.6491177

>>6491164

>the rest of 4chan is good

What the fuck kind of existence do you live?

Improve yourself.

>>6491169

White Nationalists transcend the boundaries of power relations like Icarus into the pool of human sewage leaking into the crust from the countless systems twisting under Manhattan.

>> No.6491182

>>6491177
I know you're feeling proud of yourself for that simile but you really shouldn't be

>> No.6491183

>>6491149
kek
I feel bad for him more than anything

>> No.6491187
File: 65 KB, 486x731, 1430140905504.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491187

>>6491182

Proud is an emotion for the impotent.

>>6491183

Sewage feels good in its own community of warmth. Perspective is undeniably acceptable in your position.

>> No.6491188

This thread is a joke right?

>> No.6491192
File: 180 KB, 1920x1080, _66068527_66068526.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491192

>>6491188

I hope.

>> No.6491199

>>6491157
>Anyone can post on 4chan with an opinion, it's my assumption that the level of accesibility combined with the level of babied "gifted" boys grown in our generation promised the world, the population of 4chan is either deluded trailer trash with smug sense of superiority or ignorant and ill read young men who cannot for the life of them admit they have a a bloated sense of security/ worth/ etc.
>I'm not wrong. Especially the reactionary tribes that inhabit 4chan tend to be deluded and totally in ignorance of science.
Why are you here? why do you make such and effort to respond to everyone who criticizes you?

>> No.6491206
File: 209 KB, 800x778, 1417063292049.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491206

>>6491187
I don't know why you think I'm sewage, I don't hold any sort of right wing political opinions, nor am I rude enough to insult those whose
opinions differ from my own , as you are.
I just feel sorry for you, because you're upset enough to post in about 15 threads at once. The contents of many of your posts aren't even suited to the posters you're replying to, which means you could very well be schizophrenic. Just embrace the calm life, bb

>> No.6491208
File: 205 KB, 466x625, 3 - Siddhartha Gautama.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491208

>tfw you will never speak Latin, Ancient Greek and Sanskrit
>tfw you will never fully dedicate your life to the pursue of virtue and knowledge
>tfw you will never reach enlightenment

>> No.6491212

>>6491206

>I just feel sorry for you, because you're upset enough to post in about 15 threads at once. The contents of many of your posts aren't even suited to the posters you're replying to, which means you could very well be schizophrenic. Just embrace the calm life, bb

I'm just having fun. I am perfectly calm, I just enjoy witnessing the dance neo-reactionaries tend to do. It's like ballet, it's undeniably always similar.

>> No.6491215

>>6491208
Fuck. I hope one day I can get rich enough to just spend the rest of my life doing that.

>> No.6491216

My girlfriend is getting her phd in philosophy.

>> No.6491219

>>6491206
Foucault is one of the shittiest trips on /lit/. Why take the time to respond?

>> No.6491220

>>6491199

See

>>6491212

Also, I enjoy seeing how reactionaries who tend to infest this website with entry level ideas respond to any kind of debate. Poking and prodding, so to speak, on what limits exist. Like I've said, you're undeniably similar across the board. Which is interesting give you're individualist leanings.

>> No.6491223
File: 367 KB, 664x484, queer theory.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491223

>>6491177

What do white nationalists have to do with this thread?
I don't see any.
Unless stating the facts (i.e. women don't study philosophy as much on average) is the /pol/ thing to do... But again, no surprise there, since your name is the spiritual godfather of movements that consider science a "white cis male narrative".

>> No.6491224

>>6491220
See >>6491219

>> No.6491227

>>6490944

>77% of philosophy majors are men.

While this may certainly be true in America, in Europe I'd say it's about 50/50. There are a tons of female philosophy professors out there with many published articles written by them.

I don't understand the accusations that philosophy departments are sexist, since getting published or being hired has nothing to do with gender but with ability.

>> No.6491228

>>6491219
I don't know, it just depresses me to see someone get so emotionally involved. Which is kind of a contradiction, I know.

>> No.6491230

Man, I miss (tripfag) Adorno.

>> No.6491232

>>6490944
Read the fucking sticky you /pol/ faggot.

>> No.6491239

>>6491223

>What do white nationalists have to do with this thread?

What we witness here is an appeal to defend the infographic logic, the entry level pop-sci deluge that inhabits this website with largely ill-read or ill-intepreted experiences muddied with sense of comedy and irritation.

It's another common response to challenge to investigate further.

>>6491219

This.

>>6491228

This.

>> No.6491241

>>6490944
Not that I really doubt the numbers (at least approximately), but how the fuck is that "source" on the graph acceptable? It's pretty much the same thing as putting "some books I read." Vague bullshit that defeats the purpose of providing a source.

>> No.6491244

>>6491227

My philosophy and history department is a sausage fest.

Arts are known here for chicks and you should go hang out there to pick them up.

I wouldn't know who can't associate with too many people because I'm a drug addict trying to graduate.

>> No.6491246
File: 45 KB, 600x853, 315.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491246

>>6491230


>trips other than me

>> No.6491248

>>6491239

>infographs are now a problem

This is why leftism will dig its own grave this century and the reactionaries will win.

>> No.6491251

>>6491244

What university do you go to? As far as I know philosophy is part of humanities and these mostly tend to have an equiatble female/male ratio.

>> No.6491257
File: 797 KB, 633x475, 1385610010339.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491257

>>6491248

>This is why leftism will dig its own grave this century and the reactionaries will win.

Infographics are truly a weapon to be wielded by the most competent aryan soldiers.

The social justice warriors will be the first to be beaten with the infographics. The symbol of the fourth reich will be an infographic. Our leader, the strong genetically pure, infographic.

>> No.6491266
File: 46 KB, 500x495, B00064AEL0_01_LZZZZZZZ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491266

Gagb Gbu IIIII!

>> No.6491269

>>6491257

Hehehe, funny joke man.
You should do stand-up.

>> No.6491271

>>6491266

Nice.

>> No.6491274

>>6491257
>>6491266
>shitty trip pretending to be shitty trip
this is /lit/ everyone

>> No.6491288

>>6491220
>Like I've said, you're undeniably similar across the board
Please elaborate.

>> No.6491289

>>6491274

>look at this infographic I love books!

Take your smugness and make a noose out of it, than kill yourself, so anyone can talk about work more thorough than LOOK AT THIS DISCOVERY MAGAZINE TIER INFOGRAPHIC

>>6491269

Do you have an infographic about good stand up routine?

>> No.6491295

>>6491288

Why should I elaborate something so obvious and open?

>> No.6491300

>graphs are fascist

We know you humanities dorks suck at math, but you're taking this fight against STEM-fields to the next level.

>> No.6491305

>>6491295
well you're gonna be posting anyway, I just figured you could share your findings and maybe explain why you think everyone who posts here apart from you is remarkably similar.

>> No.6491317
File: 631 KB, 1698x1131, e9f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491317

>>6491300

Here's the thing, if you're a STEM major, you're in community college. If not ever approaching upper education.

Do you know why? Because it isn't about the "fascism", it's the sensationalism core to infographics, they are tools of simplifying subjects into easily digestible wholes that can have elements of bias.

Nobody takes infographics seriously. If you'd rather read an infographic than a novel, you are truly a fucking degenerate.

It's clear you not only aren't involved with cross study into the humanities, but it's also clear you've never been involved in any kind of science.

>>6491305

I didn't say that. I said neo-reactionaries, traditionalists, monarchists, national socialists, right libertarians, anarchocapitalists, anarchist rightists, the associated kind, tend to respond in an undeniably similar fashion.

>> No.6491328

>>6491317
>if you'd rather read an infographic than a novel
Please don't tell me you went to college.

>> No.6491329

>>6491317

Visual representations of information are supposed to be SIMPLIFYING YOU FUCKING DUNSE.

>> No.6491332

>>6491317
>I'm not even gonna argue against the content, just make up garbage about the medium i

>> No.6491346
File: 429 KB, 1804x1036, d87.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491346

>>6491328

If you actually cite an infographic or take infographics as seriously you are, you have no place at all speculating worth.

>>6491329

>Visual representations of information are supposed to be SIMPLIFYING YOU FUCKING DUNSE.

And that's why they should never be taken seriously aside from in media representation of a core subject.

It's easily digestible. It's exactly as you say, and using it to talk about a subject in totality is intellectually dishonest to the nth degree.

I don't know why you're disagreeing with me. Like you said, we are in agreement.

>>6491332

>>I'm not even gonna argue against the content, just make up garbage about the medium i

So angry you couldn't finish that sentence sport?

>> No.6491347
File: 106 KB, 768x768, foucault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491347

>>6491077
No you're not.

>> No.6491360
File: 108 KB, 1920x1080, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491360

>>6491347

It's a real good thing I saved that thread.

Let me introduce you to Christian Torres.

He has long since left Soundcloud and sm3na, but he had an account on both you can look at cached. Both accounts went by the name TheAntlers.

So, adding it all up, I can assume you post on /mu/, saw a black person post their photo who enjoys The Antlers, and assumed it was me.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Xav7m3FebAMJ:sm3na.is/artist/theantler+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Not only that, but here's his fucking twitter.

https://twitter.com/Christopher_01_

He's an aspiring Music Producer. And almost nothing he posts is philosophically similar to me, especially in regards to civil rights.

And here's his bandcamp!

https://cptkiddo.bandcamp.com/

He lives in Pennsylvania!

Not San Diego.


Like not only are you arrogantly mentally retarded, you're also creepy as fuck. Knowing most white people, it goes hand in hand, so I'm not going to blame you for something you can't help.

>> No.6491363

>>6491346

Why is easily digestible information an issue?
You really have no understanding of didactics and you should go and stay in your philosophy department thinking 500 pages on "the virtual" is the way to go.

>> No.6491371

>>6490955
>Why can't men into art?
they're more into creating it than studying it

>> No.6491378

>>6491347
kek Foucault the chinless cuck. Nice hat faggot

>> No.6491379
File: 909 KB, 600x801, 5ce.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491379

>>6491363

>Why is easily digestible information an issue?

If you don't see the issue, it is why you are called "reactionary"

reaction-ary

Reacshionairy

> You really have no understanding of didactics and you should go and stay in your philosophy department thinking 500 pages on "the virtual" is the way to go.

Are you implying criticism of infographics is a breach of fucking dialetics? You have got to be kidding me.

>>6491371

It's a good thing most white men on 4chan are totally tactless and artless.

>> No.6491384
File: 134 KB, 283x248, 1430093604740.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491384

>>6491378

You are literally so angry, that you fail to notice the giant post I made before that.

It is either you didn't see it, didn't notice it, you're blind, or you filtered me, all of which are pretty humiliating in your position.

>> No.6491402

>>6491379

Presenting data is now reactionary.

>> No.6491417

>>6491384
>the lack of self-awareness

>> No.6491422
File: 28 KB, 142x220, 266642_penn_jillette.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491422

>>6491402

No, presenting data in a form that is for media use as a serious source of discussion isn't something any STEM major would do who is in any kind of higher education, and not in high school.

You're total failure to understand the issue here is proving once again how often high school students post in a seeming intellectual capacity on 4chan.

>>6491417

I didn't know lack of self awareness wasn't a defining characteristic of anyone who labels themselves a traditionalist.

>> No.6491424

>>6491360
So your name is Christian and you live in Pennsylvania? Are you sure you're not simply presenting a façade on this site, as a Californian negro, and post your real social media accounts as a way to derive some sort of perverse pleasure from the humiliation it gives you? Is this your way of becoming an Other on this white dominated board, pushing yourself away from the mean in order to garner more attention as a novelty, black tripfag? Perhaps your shitposting is just your way of advancing this Otherness.

>> No.6491428

>>6491384
You're incredibly ugly.

>> No.6491430

>>6491402
Are you really going up to bat for infographics? Data without methodology is pointless.

>> No.6491431

>>6491422

How would you present data in a non-ambiguous manner?

>> No.6491434

>>6491424
>>6491360
Tripfag war NOW

>> No.6491443
File: 35 KB, 616x462, AGAPE_RG3_Penn-Jillette-Horiz_s4x3_lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491443

>>6491424

Let's have a look at his fucking twitter since you apparently have a lack of comprehension of easy to use UI in such a sense so astounding it will capture the imagination of the entire planet.

"#BlackLivesMatter Only after they learn to act civilized and stop looting.'

You would not see me saying this, but I'm sure someone as ill educated as a right thinker would.

You absolute dumbass. You sycophantic shit eating cockroach.

You dunder headed weasel.

You monster of chode wielding.

>>6491428

>Stupid
>Creepy
>Tends to use his gut

It seems, you have all the defining characteristics of a white 40k fan.

>>6491431

Not using infographics you fucking disgusting mongrel.

>>6491434

WAR

>> No.6491453

>>6491360
>https://twitter.com/Christopher_01_
>36 tweets all under a month old
Nice job creating a twitter account. The desperation to be respected by strangers on 4chan is real.

>> No.6491461

>>6491453

Did you not see the fucking other sources of information all involving reverse image search that goes back to a soundcloud and other user bases he has long since deleted?

Ask a fucking mod, my IP is in San Diego.

Again, nationalist whites like yourself again and again, respond in the same fashion, and prove themselves to be creepy obsessive insect like and subhuman. Conspiratorial.

>> No.6491463

>>6491443

>Not using infographics you fucking disgusting mongrel.

That was obvious.
So? Any suggestions?

>> No.6491464

>>6491443
Hey guys I'm new here. Is Penny G a /lit/ meme?

>> No.6491465

>>6491378
Perhaps it is his chin - a strong jaw and chin being the signifier of a man - that causes Foucault to act out. Though he finds pleasure in his Self, Christian, being degraded, he projects his online persona onto, what he calls, a strong black bull. Of course, this is not what he is. He cannot consider himself a man because his conception of a man is he who has a strong chin and jaw. We can gather from this that Foucault lacks the traits he deems manly in his internalised Ideology, causing him to project a masculine image while debasing his Self.

>> No.6491468

>>6491443
You're ugly as fuck, you cuck.

>> No.6491475

this is getting gud

>> No.6491478
File: 1.96 MB, 580x433, 018.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491478

>>6491463

Yes,not using /lit/ memes.

>>6491465

Someone over the age of 17 typed this.

Because they love infographics.

Take a moment of pause to realize these people are furious at infographic criticism and how terrible they would be in an academic environment.
>>6491468

You are falling into the same means of reaction tended with care by other reactionaries.

>> No.6491485

>>6491478
Holy shit you're a fucking embarrassment. Please stop ruining it for all the other Focaultfags.

>> No.6491486

>>6491478
Nope. You're just ugly.

>> No.6491487

>>6490944
At my university there are actually more women than men studying philosophy.

>> No.6491488

> thread descending into spamming "reactionaries" and "cucks"
Perfect.

>> No.6491492
File: 7 KB, 207x244, Freud.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491492

>>6491465
perhaps Foucault suffers from chin envy? as we all know the chin is a potent phallic symbol.

Tell me Foucault, how would you describe your relationship with your father?

>> No.6491493

>>6491465
my fucking sides that was good

>> No.6491494
File: 135 KB, 287x274, 1429916593498.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491494

>>6491485

You could have stopped this if you just agreed with me about the facts involving infographic use.

>>6491486

Post a picture of yourself. I want to see what someone looks like who gets so heated over criticism of information delivery.

>>6491488

I do my best. I have a poop thread derailment certification.

>> No.6491497

>>6491478

So you don't have any alternatives?
No surprise there.

>> No.6491498

>>6490975
Have you ever tried to make a professional brochure for an international art museum? Shit takes a lot of time. Don't be so dismissive, man.

>> No.6491499

>>6491494
Ugly.

>> No.6491504

>>6491494
This is my first time speaking to you. Tell me what you have against Foucault.

>> No.6491505
File: 56 KB, 250x312, penn_jillette.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491505

>>6491492

Is it not Freudian to get this upset over infographics?

>>6491497

If you cannot find an alternative to infographics you are monumentally fucking retarded in all aspects human and beyond.

>>6491499

>Post a picture of yourself. I want to see what someone looks like who gets so heated over criticism of information delivery.

Also to add, whites tend to age like soured milk so I'm curious what kind of man I'm dealing with if he's over the age of 25.

>> No.6491510

>>6491494
>imonlypretending.jpg

>> No.6491512

>>6491505
Wow. He's racist too.

>> No.6491513

>>6491505

You're the one avoiding the question going "not graphs though", yeah I know, but I'm asking you other ways and you consistently refuse to name any.

>> No.6491514

>>6491505
how old were you when you first realized you had no chin? Did you feel jealous? angry?

>> No.6491517

>>6491443
Your sudden rage, caused by my analyses of you, intrigues me. What could I have done to offend you so? Could it be that I am spot on in my analyses? It is very likely. No man would be so easily offended at a simple misconception, or misdiagnoses, of him, as he would not have to defend an obviously false a=statement against his Self. You, on the other hand, show aggression and defensiveness. These are two typical Signifiers of 'male-ness', or manhood, something you wish to obtain, but cannot become without, in essence, becoming the Other, thus warping into a mindset alien to your own.
>>6491478
Again, you fly into a rage at my analyses. Your defensive mechanistic constructs of dismissing your opponents is a clear sign that you do not wish to engage with others, as you see yourself as an Other - in your online persona. Your moral disgust at reactionaries, nationalists and Europeans shows that you, or rather your Other persona, define yourself against these ideologies. This definition through negativity tells me that you see yourself as fighting against them, rather than fighting for yourself. You are, therefore, a mercenary, an outsider. This further supports my claim that you are merely presenting a façade on this board.

>> No.6491521

>>6491505
Your racism is as ugly as your face.

>> No.6491526

You guys are all losers.

>> No.6491527
File: 22 KB, 260x390, 9781612680767_p0_v1_s260x420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491527

>>6491504

This is not the first time because I've seen that excuse for total logic denial used a million times. "This is the first time", almost across the board. It is either reactionaries exist within some sort of hive mind and/or you are totally mindless.

Admit you are wrong, and submit, totally.

>>6491510

Pretending what? That I'm not sitting here in total amazement reactionaries get so upset over criticism of use in debate of a fucking infographic?

This is why I suspect you are in high school.

>>6491513

I am not avoiding the question at all.

See

>If you cannot find an alternative to infographics you are monumentally fucking retarded in all aspects human and beyond.


>>6491514

Let me ask you a question. Why are you so desperate to prove my point, about the desperation of whites, to be creepy, insolent, and stupid, in the face of anger?

Gossiping beings?

>>6491517

You are getting angry at infographics.

Stop typing.

>>6491521

Buddy, if you're complaining about racism, go after any other example within this thread.

End your insolence.

>> No.6491531

>>6490944
7.9% of archaeologists are male

holy fuck i need to get in on this

that's like 11 gals for every guy

>> No.6491533

This is why I hate this board.
Books are good but it's just a constant process of superiority in condescension acted out by young adults.
Fuck this thread; fuck all your egotistical constructs.

>> No.6491534

>>6491527
An ugly, chinless, racist...hilarious.

>> No.6491539

>>6491527
But really, why choose to pick on Foucault? Is it because he was gay?

>> No.6491543
File: 7 KB, 200x195, 1429853780881.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491543

>>6491534

Truly hilarious this all started from criticism of infographic usage.

You should apologize to me.

>>6491539

You are so insolent, you have yet to apologize for wasting my time and not addressing the incorrect way you were using infographics.

>> No.6491544
File: 54 KB, 768x998, lacan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491544

>>6491492
The high percentage of African-American single mothers, and therefore fatherless children, would tell me that in all likelihood Foucault has never met his father, or perhaps met him only in later life, after his conception of masculinity had been developed. This would mean that Foucault derived his sense of masculinity from television and film. For this reason, Foucault identifies masculinity with being physically strong, with strong facial features which he lacks, as his chin, jaw, cheekbones and forehead are weak, which he deems feminine. This is why his online, masculine, persona is from California, as that is where his Idols of masculinity are from.

>> No.6491546

>>6491527

>still refusing
>still "ur dumb if u cant think of any"

Nice of you to not admit you can't name any. Your pride is too important I see and the other party needs and should remain the lesser in your eyes.
Thank god you saved face for yourself.

>> No.6491555

>>6491527
Your need for your chin to be validated is perfectly normal foucault. There are surgeries that can extend your chin and broaden it. I have watched the reaction images you post and they are all of men with strong prominent chins, you clearly feel impotent in a world where chins and images of chins are propagated and worshipped. I can help you. give me your email address and I will put you in touch with a plastic surgeon. Maybe he can take care of those chubby cheeks too, eh?

>> No.6491558
File: 2.95 MB, 390x293, 1411458641589.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491558

>>6491544

You are so angry you're bringing in concepts of domestic abuse

Let me tell you, whites are like this because your parents don't discipline you what so ever.

You do not see, in any other race, someone so lax as whites on parenting.

And this is how you end up with spoiled brats who flip the fuck out at the mere criticism of information delivery.

>>6491555
Let me introduce you to Christian Torres.

He has long since left Soundcloud and sm3na, but he had an account on both you can look at cached. Both accounts went by the name TheAntlers.

So, adding it all up, I can assume you post on /mu/, saw a black person post their photo who enjoys The Antlers, and assumed it was me.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Xav7m3FebAMJ:sm3na.is/artist/theantler+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Not only that, but here's his fucking twitter.

https://twitter.com/Christopher_01_

He's an aspiring Music Producer. And almost nothing he posts is philosophically similar to me, especially in regards to civil rights.

And here's his bandcamp!

https://cptkiddo.bandcamp.com/

He lives in Pennsylvania!

Not San Diego.


Like not only are you arrogantly mentally retarded, you're also creepy as fuck. Knowing most white people, it goes hand in hand, so I'm not going to blame you for something you can't help.

>>6491546

But it's true. You are in totality insolent and stupid if you cannot think of a solid way to do this.

>> No.6491569

>>6491558

>But it's true. You are in totality insolent and stupid if you cannot think of a solid way to do this.

Now guide me?

>> No.6491570
File: 15 KB, 482x370, 1430525896871.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491570

>>6491569

>Now guide me?

First, go to community college.

>> No.6491577

>>6491558
Faggot

>> No.6491581

>>6491570
How long did you stare at that chin in the macro before you posted it?

>> No.6491582
File: 245 KB, 564x376, 1429861735666.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491582

>>6491577

I know you are, but what am I?

>> No.6491584
File: 37 KB, 836x450, bruce-campbell-in-maniac-cop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491584

>>6491544
I think you might be on to something Jaques, Society's fetish for movie stars and their unattainably masculine chins has had a deep impact on young foucault's psyche.

Perhaps when he was young there was an incident? maybe he was riding a bike and his helmet fell off because the strap found no hold on his meagre chin and then CRASH! his subsequent trip to the hospital cost his mother dearly and he felt guilt, all this caused by an inadequate chin.

>> No.6491585

>>6491570

How are you feeling right now? Do you think you saved face by calling out the other party for its lack of intelligence yet you yourself were equally unable to answer a simple question?

>> No.6491586

This thread is shit.
/pol/ literally has better discussions.

>> No.6491588

>effortposts from sad tripfags

>> No.6491590

>>6491582
A faggot.

>> No.6491595
File: 1.42 MB, 768x768, chin.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491595

I for one, having a small chin myself, wish to help the fellow out.

>> No.6491596

>>6491586
Not really. Replace reactionary with cuck and cuck with cucked by niggers and you get the same thing.

>> No.6491600
File: 301 KB, 960x960, 1429888030371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491600

>>6491581


Let me introduce you to Christian Torres.

He has long since left Soundcloud and sm3na, but he had an account on both you can look at cached. Both accounts went by the name TheAntlers.

So, adding it all up, I can assume you post on /mu/, saw a black person post their photo who enjoys The Antlers, and assumed it was me.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Xav7m3FebAMJ:sm3na.is/artist/theantler+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Not only that, but here's his fucking twitter.

https://twitter.com/Christopher_01_

He's an aspiring Music Producer. And almost nothing he posts is philosophically similar to me, especially in regards to civil rights.

And here's his bandcamp!

https://cptkiddo.bandcamp.com/

He lives in Pennsylvania!

Not San Diego.

Like not only are you arrogantly mentally retarded, you're also creepy as fuck. Knowing most white people, it goes hand in hand, so I'm not going to blame you for something you can't help.

>>6491584

Are you starting to discuss over skype ways to save face by posting Bruce Cambell by speculating on my upbringing because you fail to in any way appreciate my mocking of how ill educated you are so not only do you refuse to accept information like an autistic spastic lunatic on 4chan.

This is all typical

From
STEM
Majors

>>6491585

I feel like you need to go to community college and graduate high school.

>>6491595

Let me introduce you to Christian Torres.

He has long since left Soundcloud and sm3na, but he had an account on both you can look at cached. Both accounts went by the name TheAntlers.

So, adding it all up, I can assume you post on /mu/, saw a black person post their photo who enjoys The Antlers, and assumed it was me.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Xav7m3FebAMJ:sm3na.is/artist/theantler+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Not only that, but here's his fucking twitter.

https://twitter.com/Christopher_01_

He's an aspiring Music Producer. And almost nothing he posts is philosophically similar to me, especially in regards to civil rights.

And here's his bandcamp!

https://cptkiddo.bandcamp.com/

He lives in Pennsylvania!

Not San Diego.


Like not only are you arrogantly mentally retarded, you're also creepy as fuck. Knowing most white people, it goes hand in hand, so I'm not going to blame you for something you can't help.

>>6491596

You are furious.

>> No.6491602

>>6491595
alright now what about the rest of his face?

>> No.6491604
File: 106 KB, 598x336, 3_Berube_article.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491604

>>6491595

Do you want me to contact Mr. Torres and let him know that you are spreading his image?

I think this can specify legal action.

>> No.6491605
File: 38 KB, 550x365, 1428862797808.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491605

>>6491602

That's it, I'm contacting Christopher.

It's over.

>> No.6491606

>>6491600
I have to thank you. Your unstable ramblings have been extremely entertaining this evening. God bless tripfags.

>> No.6491611

>>6491606

It's going to get even more entertaining in a second.

Just wait.

>> No.6491612

>>6491605
>>6491604
Chris is gay

>> No.6491615

>>6490975
Holy shit you can't possibly be this retarded where you think Philosophy is a good degree or would be thrown in with Mathematics.

>> No.6491622
File: 38 KB, 640x480, 499184192_640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491622

>>6491527
>>6491543
You are now eager to dismiss all criticism with swift, generic responses. I believe you have given up, at this stage, now only responding so you will have the last word, retaining your masculinity, as you dem having the last word to be a masculine trait, which ties in with this:
>>6491558
You have brought up domestic abuse, I did no such thing. But now we have uncovered a reason as to why you had no father. Was your father abusive to your mother? Did you witness cruel acts? Did you try to step in and were pushed aside, thereby emasculated in front of your mother, your Ideal of womanhood. Was your father a dominant male with a strong chin? When he left you turned inward, to television, developing a persona of which you could never attain. A persona of your father, of your Hollywood Idols. Those Idols from the silver screen, they always took their prize, the women, in the end, no? But they are not you and you are not them. You will always fail to reach your ideal of masculinity, even with corrective surgery you have still developed your Self as chinless, as emasculated.
>>6491584
I believe so. There is such a strong emphasis on chins, especially when young Foucault was growing up, see the Rocky films, Die Hard, and so on.

>> No.6491623
File: 242 KB, 1024x819, 1430145604001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491623

>>6491612

This is like, when an 8 year old fucks with his sister's dollhouse and the daughter goes to her mother and the son cries "I'M SORRY! I'M SORRY!"

>>6491615

It is. Why are fields a competition in payment?

>> No.6491626

>>6491605
>hey I don't know you but these guys are posting your face on a 4chan image board
>...Y-you don't care? well do you at least want me to contact the cyber police for you? we can press charges and teach the whites a lesson! this is how the black revolution will start I am sure of it!
>oh you don't devote days of your life caring about what people on 4chan think of you because you're a well adjusted human bean? ok well I'll still go ahead and press charges though ok?

>> No.6491627

>>6491622

AGAIN, I am letting Chris know you are spreading his image and calling him "chinless" and speculating such about his childhood.

All you had to do was admit you were wrong about infographics.

Too late now.

>> No.6491628

>>6491623
I have never seen one person so insecure about his chin - only 4chan can breed such extremities of character.

>> No.6491632

>>6491626

No, I'm letting him know you called him a chinless nigger. I'm letting him no trailer trash are furious and somehow got a hold of his image.

>>6491628

This keeps getting better.

>> No.6491641

>>6491632
Then, how are you going to report him?

>> No.6491645

>>6491632
>complete strangers are insulting me and using my image? on an obscure board thats discusses music lyrics and marxism no less? this shall not stand, together Foucault the tripfag and I shall get the cyber police to end this torrent of racism on 4chan. no longer will racists speak their minds on the internet! no longer will complete strangers get away with saying what they please on anonymous image boards! Onward my tripfag friend, to justice!

>> No.6491646
File: 182 KB, 1197x573, Goodbye.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6491646

>>6491641

And now all I have to do is wait.