/lit/ - Literature

you're mam

>>6371923
why even bother with such obvious bait?

>>6371923

Maybe for Dark Enlightenment aficionados

>>6371946
It's not bait

>>6371923
Not until there's a legitimate
> Whats the Fart Letters of videogames?

Despite every moderately ambitions project declaring itself the Citizen Kane of vidya (six months prior to the release date, no less), there has yet to be a game recognized as such.

what game is this

>>6371948

What the fuck is you going with that Dark enlightenment fedora bullshit?

>>6371981

It's called Moldbug: Legends of RedPill

>>6371953
to answer the question, yes it is

>>6371981
Ryse: Son of Rome

>>6371981
ryse: son of rome

>>6371985

>>6371981
30 Seconds of Button-Mashing Followed by 30 Minutes of Cut-Scenes the Video Game. Or just Shit for short.

>>6371956
Games will be "art" when they start delving in to their own nature and dealing with that successfully. There's currently too much of an obsession with trying to be some other medium, particularly film.

I don't think they will surpass books until you can hook your nervous system in and feel the games.

>>6372022
what about mgs?

>>6372030
>tfw you will never feel a feel in a feel simulator

>>6372040
Never played MGS, but I'm sort of familiar with Kojima's other games. He at least employs movie-like elements well and owns up to, unlike other developers who insist on making their games like a movie.

>>6372022
That's one of the crucial elements, yes. It will be a nice day to see games capable of satirical self-correction, at the very least -- that might be the first step to achieving serious self-reflection.

Also critical to their development into an "art" form is to buck some of the capitalist influences behind the creative process. Much like television, which has largely failed to achieve true beauty in the Aristotelian sense due to networks deciding both what gets made and when it ends, the game industry will constantly and actively stifle idiosyncratic developments until they prove to be profitable.

>>6372045
You might anon, unless you're really old.

>>6372081
>>6372022

>>6372022
Some games have done this successfully, Papers Please being a good example.

>people still think /v/ isn't the single worst place on the internet

>>6372187
I wouldn't mind seeing the guy who makes these get captured by ISIS.

>>6372193
seconding this, hope he burns really slow

>>6372187

this is the worst thing I've ever seen