[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 704 KB, 1500x1125, alexander-hamilton-and-thomas-jefferson-775.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6234249 No.6234249 [Reply] [Original]

Who's economic visions were better /lit/, and why?

>> No.6234380

I don't care, because I'm not a fucking stupid americunt whose political philosophies are discenerned from individuals who died 200 years ago

>> No.6234460

>>6234249

Jefferson was a real American, Hamilton was a little bitch and he died like one.

>> No.6234705

Marx's.

Jefferson wanted an agrarian society where you can be left alone (to rape your slave girls **cough! cough**) But let's be honest, Jefferson was a proto-libertarian aspie. He also forgot to take industrialization into account and failed to consider the opportunities of big cities.

Hamilton may have not been "American" but he sure contributed a fuckload to its creation. He was right in fearing the masses and their possible idiocy and bigotry. He wanted centralized rule, however I feel he was too heavily in favor with the bourgeoisie and (with the establishment of a central bank) was too focused on elite rule, not even eventual emancipation from statism. Maybe if he lived a century later, he may have been a Marxist.

>> No.6234724

>>6234705
>Marx's.
That one. Marx was not only correct he was a much better writer.

>> No.6234924

>>6234249

Pre-civil war: Jefferson.
Post-war: Hamilton.

Industrialization killed the dream of having an agrarian society.

>> No.6234939

>>6234924

That's like saying the square cube law killed the dream of Godzilla

>muh why doesn't reality conform to my idealistic theories?

>> No.6234963

Neither, they're liberals

>> No.6234979
File: 60 KB, 198x193, 1409744230389.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6234979

>>6234705

>proto-libertarian aspie

>> No.6234997

>>6234963
Where do you stand politically?

>> No.6234999

>>6234997

I'll guess fascism?

>> No.6235003
File: 106 KB, 460x271, zizek-discurso-de-odio.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6235003

>my god they're both the worst!

>> No.6235006

Neither, but Hamilton.

>> No.6235007

>>6235003
this doesn't sound like zizek, you suck

>> No.6235019
File: 16 KB, 353x347, Robespierre.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6235019

>>6234249

Robespierre

>> No.6235035

>>6235007
*schniff* my got, this is precisely what is meant when it is said as phrase popularized as "pure ideology" and so on

>> No.6235051

>>6235035
but anon, everything is ideology. You chose to eat a sandwich and not a hotdog? Ideology. You slept on the left side of the bed and not the right? Ideology. I absolutely mean this. The ripple effects of what we believe extend to the furthest corners and crevices of our personalities, our actions, our thoughts--everything. You "believe" an action is better than another...this belief constitutes a miniature ideology as part of a greater one. Capitalism isn't the default. There is no default. All is ideology.

>> No.6235056
File: 23 KB, 300x300, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6235056

>>6235051

but anon

ideology is text

>> No.6235064

>>6235051
this post is the most distilled form of ideology I've ever read

>> No.6235069
File: 135 KB, 700x1072, In Defence of the Terror - Wahnich.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6235069

>>6235019
Did you rec this one, anon?