/lit/ - Literature

File: 2.25 MB, 3264x2448, IMG_0287.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Which version of Ulysses to buy? Kirtpole Tue Mar 3 17:44:09 2015 No.6219974 [Reply] [Original]

I just bought Ulysses and it turned out to be huge to the point it is unreadable. Which version should I buy after selling this one?

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 3 17:45:55 2015 No.6219982 >>6219974 Vintage. Looks like you bought some shitty Print on Demand version. Watch out for those, they're the biggest scam in the book business these days.

>>	Kirtpole Tue Mar 3 17:46:17 2015 No.6219985 File: 2.53 MB, 3264x2448, IMG_0288.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This is the inside

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 3 17:47:16 2015 No.6219989 >>6219982 As long as all the words are in there, what's the problem?

>>	Kirtpole Tue Mar 3 17:47:20 2015 No.6219990 >>6219982 I've heard the Gabler edition is the best.

>>	Kirtpole Tue Mar 3 17:49:07 2015 No.6219997 >>6219989 It is uncomfortable to read, have and use with the annotated version.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 3 17:54:33 2015 No.6220022 >>6219974 that's such a waste of paper. How are you even supposed to read that comfortably?

Anonymous Tue Mar 3 17:54:49 2015 No.6220023

>>6219990
There's a bit of a controversy surrounding the Gabler edition. He didn't actually select a copytext from any of the manuscripts and created the text from all the available manuscripts.

The 1961 edition seems to me the most accurate and is sold by Vintage. If it's 1922 vs 1966 vs Gabler editions and not just publisher editions, then you'll have to do your own research.

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1988/dec/08/the-new-ulysses-the-hidden-controversy/

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 3 17:55:18 2015 No.6220029 >>6219997 >annotated >tripfag leave it to his level of a cunt to be so incredibly dumb as fuck

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 3 17:56:17 2015 No.6220033 >>6220023 If it's 1922 vs 1966 vs Gabler editions that you're worried about and not just publisher editions then you'll have to do your own research

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 3 18:01:23 2015 No.6220056 >>6220023 I think the Vintage one is the only that didn't name chapters as to Joyce's preference.

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 4 03:40:05 2015 No.6222241 >>6219985 that really does look disgusting to read. really any other version will be better than that

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 4 03:56:17 2015 No.6222278 >>6219974 Are there good translations of this book? I have one copy in spanish translated by Jose Salas Subirat which I haven't read.

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 4 04:01:24 2015 No.6222294 >>6222278 >translation

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 4 04:48:11 2015 No.6222356 File: 295 KB, 582x546, 尤利西斯.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6222278

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 4 05:00:54 2015 No.6222384 >>6222278 I bought one in german because I generally prefer reading in German I think I might have done goofd tbh

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 4 05:14:14 2015 No.6222415 I have the Penguin Classics but haven't read it yet. Is that not a good edition to have?

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 4 05:16:54 2015 No.6222425 >>6222278 There are actually two Finnish translations.

>>	Anonymous Wed Mar 4 05:54:53 2015 No.6222507 >>6222356 > Latin not translated to Classical Chinese Utmost pleb. Burn it with fire.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]