/lit/ - Literature

Oh look, yet another movie about himself, that man was never interesting and all of his movies suck dick

also /tv/

You could have posted the synopsis and I'd have guessed it'd be Allen. Fucking predictable.

Hate emma stone but joaquin phoenix though

this shit is ass

someone shoot this pedo

When's he gonna make an Asian jailbait fap fest?

>>6178376
meanwhile at Woody Allen's house
"hey Woody have you read Stoner? It's really good"
"n-no.. um, never heard of it..."

>>6178406
you mean Blue Angel, surely

>>6178394
shiet, I was about to shitpost about his being a pedo but had forgotten that it was actually the case

oh well.

Reminder that the auteur of this degenracy's real last name is Konigsberg.
/pol/ is always right.

>>6178415
wait. are you saying that woody allen is jewish?

it's a good thing you're here, anon. there is absolutely no way anyone would have known that otherwise

Woody Allen did nothing wrong

Annie Hall is one of my favorite movies and Joaquin Phoenix is excellent, I'll check this one out.

It was probably just mild pedophilia, if it even happened.

Woody Allen/Emma Stone is something that will exist as part of the human record.

Somebody read Stoner

Why is Joaquin in this?

>>6178394
Him and roman polanski both

Fucking cunts shoot up schools but no one's clipped these dirty paedo's yet

smfh

shame emma stones in it, gonna have to give it a watch now

>>6178493
>>6178394
They've contributed far more to human culture than either of you ever will

LOL that people are still butthurt about Woody Allen

>>6178493
at least polanski's made some good films and he admits to and regrets what he did

>>6178507
No, they've made a negative contribution to human culture.

>>6178507
they both raped children dude lol

>>6178523
>muh degeneracy.
I bet you think all artistic statements are evaluative statements, you philistine.

>>6178523
I'm sure you have the credentials to make that claim lol

Woody Allen hasn't made a good film in 40 years.

>>6178533
Good for them. I'll bet they enjoyed it

>>6178552

>>6178546
Everybody liked Midnight in Paris

>>6178557
Please don't post pics of yourself for no reason

>>6178567

>>6178578
And he keeps doing it

>>6178517
If he regretted what he did, truly, then he wouldn't run from the consequences.

>>6178552
haha look at this edge lord

>>6178507
Ha! Their un-insightful, pretentious "art" films, are shit. They have created no new schools of thoughts, have not moved any one to anything. They are just boring. And to most people, any and all "value" of their works is negated by their crimes.

>>6178582
>any movie
>contributed to human culture
>culture

*cough* Stoner *cough*

>>6178559
Don't tell me people actually liked that film.
The acting was literally cringeworthy at times, the story and characters were downright retarded, and the film showed such a lack of knowledge concerning the subject of literature that I ask myself why Woody Allen even decided to make a movie about this shit if he doesn't know anything about it.
The movie has so much promise, the period, 20s Paris, is so rich, Woody could have made it such a great movie, and then he goes and makes Midnight in Paris.

>>6178376
Yeah, because it was such an original idea no one ever thought of it before John Williams. Except that was another instructor, not a student. But still, anything remotely similar must be based on that one book that was kind of like it.

>>6178376
>Oh look, yet another movie about himself

Sounds more like Philip Roth