[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 49 KB, 310x459, Kierkegaard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6117285 No.6117285 [Reply] [Original]

Everyone here says Hegel is hard but i didn't find that to be true at all. Hegelian Dialectic was totally understandable to me, in fact it seemed to put a name and a language to how I already felt about reality.

Kierkegaard however, is impossible for me to wrap my head around. What the hell is this guy talking about?

>> No.6117297

Literally: once you figure out meaning is irrelevant, the only possible option is having faith in Christ of Nazareth

he was an idiot

>> No.6117310

>>6117297
Are you sure?

>> No.6117341

>>6117310

>Now the issue is: will you be offended or will you believe. If you will believe, then you push through the possibility of offense and accept Christianity on any terms. So it goes; then forget the understanding; then you say: Whether it is a help or a torment, I want only one thing, I want to belong to Christ, I want to be a Christian.

>Faith is a hallmark of Kierkegaardian philosophical and religious thought. Two of his key ideas are based on faith: the leap to faith and the knight of faith. Kierkegaard was a Christian Universalist,[6] writing in his journals, "If others go to Hell, I will go too. But I do not believe that; on the contrary, I believe that all will be saved, myself with them—something which arouses my deepest amazement."

>> No.6117360

>>6117341
>I believe that all will be saved, myself with them—something which arouses my deepest amazement
I like that.

>>6117297
Then can we say that he's one of the foremost philosophers to define a meaninglessness of reality, if there is nothing further we can gain?

>> No.6117371

>>6117297
>meaning is irrelevant
>he was an idiot

seems like he was about 120 years ahead of the curb if you are an absurdist or existentialist. hardly what i'd call an idiot, even if you're an atheist

>> No.6117378

>>6117371
>fall in love with 14 year old girl
>propose
>back out because too autistic

Why do we read kierkegaard again?

>> No.6117386

>>6117378
why are you so content to judge people based on their personal decisions, and in such a braindead, meme-ified way?

>> No.6117391

>>6117360
>Then can we say that he's one of the foremost philosophers to define a meaninglessness of reality
That would be Gorgias, surely.

>> No.6117396

>>6117378
Because of the stupendous prose and the post-Hegelian insight, regardless of his lack of ugly Danish jailbait

>> No.6117433

>>6117371

why was it so hard for these idiots to let go of the idea of purpose or meaning?

all of human thought has been a huge shitstorm of stupidity

>> No.6117502

Best translation of Kierkegaard?

>tfw there will still be people who mock translations as if everyone should learn Danish before reading keeks

>> No.6117514

>>6117341
>conflating Anti-Climacus with Kierkegaard

>> No.6117566

>>6117502
get the PUP versions by the Hongs

>> No.6117851

>>6117502
I'm read the sickness unto death with penguins translation and it is very good. Beautiful writing

>> No.6118038

>>6117514
Shh, you'll confuse him

>> No.6118052

>>6117514

>conflating Zarathustra with Nietzsche

uhhh

>> No.6118275

>>6117285
Relating the self to itself in the relation to the self relating to itself the relation is the third term of the self being related to another.

>> No.6118280

>>6118275

"The self is a relation that relates itself to itself or is the relation's relating itself to itself in the relation; the self is not the relation but is the relation's relating itself to itself."

>> No.6118282
File: 9 KB, 196x230, Heraclitus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6118282

>>6117386
But sir, aren't you not judging me based on my personal decision right now?

>> No.6118296
File: 169 KB, 760x797, 1397763417198.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6118296

>>6117396
now this is an actual reply

>> No.6118300

>>6118280
Thanks, I thought I typed that.

>> No.6119363

>even if you're an atheist

That's racist.