/lit/ - Literature

Sure thing, man! Maybe we will meet some cute ladies there. I think we would both be good boyfriends.

>>5931263
>2015
>unrealistic standards of beauty.
You're oppressing me.

>>5931259
nah fuck you, i am gonna get wasted and read foucalt.

>>5931259
Find a book on overcoming stuttering, you damn dirty ape

>>5931259
Look at this weeaboo faggot with his stutter typing.

Didn't I tell you to stop talking to me until you fixed that stutter?

ayy you remind me of Bowie, I think I'm gonna full Jagger on your ass

>>5931259

No I don't like short haired cunts. You're probably a feminist or some shit fuck off.

Yeah okay
>avoid her forever because idk what to do

>>5931259
no now fuck off you carpet munching shit.

>tfw no moss stitch jumper

>>5931259
Oh, my god! I cannot believe what my precious ears are hearing! I am absolutely perplexed as to why you would think I would accompany a boyish harlot anywhere, let alone into a den of cast-off intellectual vacuity and perversion. Likely I would catch leptospirosis from the waste of some vermin and quickly expire! Now begone from my presence, before you unsettle my valve!

>>5931355
absolutely this. I'd be utterly petrified.

>>5931992
my sides

>>5931259
Fuck yes. I'm always down for an opportunity to go raid used bookstores.

>>5931992

Holy shit what the fuck happened to your hair?

>>5931259
She's very pretty. I'd have no problem with her looks, as long as she acted feminine, and wasn't butch.

>>5931259
Fuck off tranny, I don't buy poorfag peasant books

>>5932027
This.
Hate her glasses tho.

>>5931259

>Old lady lips
>Weak chin and jaw
>Dumbass glasses probably blind as a bat
>Flat chesteed
>Shit tier genetics
>Dyke haircut

Nah, I'm good.

>>5931992

This post made my valve open.

Jesus why is /lit/ so full of reactionaries?

>tfw you will never have a lit waifu

>>5931992
this post is exactly why I occasionally go on /lit/

>>5931259
Any ronery qts on /lit/ for new years?

>>5932136
Because literature is a very aristocratic thing.
>>5932071
>isn't a tranny
>is kind of qute
>tfw no gf
I'd love to, what are you doing this friday?

>>5932173
/rit/

>>5932180

You have no clue. War, riding horses, duelling and raping farmer's daughters is aristocratic.

Scribbling and reading has always been the field of the middling class, who for this reason, once printing was invented, rule the world.

>>5932136
it's the easiest way to blame things going wrong in life is because "things aren't how they used to be"

sometimes this is true and other times it's not but it's not surprising the demographic of this website leans in the general direction of neoreactionary thought for the reasons that they're neet or have no gfs or are wizards or whatever is because of the jews/blacks/immigrants/feminists/anything that wasn't in the way before, even though most of them were always there, they just didn't notice it because they were kids.

>>5932149
my ex gf was basically only into hard sci-fi and modern fantasy and it got kind of tiring after a while

I want a pleb GF so I can feel smarter than her.

Someone who would earnestly say, "Wow, you are so smart!"

>>5932214
By middling class, you mean the clerks and churchmen ? Because those weren't the middling class by any means, and they were even quite powerful in their time.

Also note:

>Geoffrey of Villehardouin was a knight, a diplomat and a general who led troops during the fourth crusade in the early thirteenth century, but he also wrote one of the first historical accounts in French
>it's worth noting that Geoffrey was a layman, ie he was technically not among the clerk you described as "middling class"

>Dante, an aristocrat who rode a horse to battle and was for a short time in charge of a whole city, was an avid reader and a keen writer
>he would exchange love poems with his fellows literate aristocrats


Need I continue, sir, or have you already resolved to read a book before you pretend to know what is aristocratic and what is not ?

>>5932238
>sad anon detected
Sad anon, why must you be so sad?

>>5932238
That's why I come to /lit. Try hanging out on /tv perhaps ?

>>5932214
>you will never fight in the hundred years war
>you will never be the richest man in England
>you will never use your riches to legitimise jousting between wars
>you will never have the best shoes and outfits to dance the court and peasant ladies into bed after winning all the tournaments
>you will never be a founding member of the royal order of the garter
>you will never receive the first duchy outside of a direct heir in England
>you will never find Christ anointing the seven wounds of your body you have developed from delving deep into each of the mortal sins
>you will never write a devotational book to steer others from your decadent ways, listing each of them
>you will never pass the copies of your book to your noble friends who can't even afford a bible
>you will never be Henry of Grosmont, First Duke of Lancaster
>you can only aspire to become bourgeois scum

>>5932214
You do know that aristocracy continued for a long time after the 13th century, right?

>>5932238
Almost everyone is pleb. Finding a pleb girlfriend is the easiest thing in the world

>>5932173
Hi, I'm a grill, but I'm not qt and I'm not ronery.

>>5932293
Better than nothing, it's not like I can pick.

>>5932261

You need to read some George MacDonald Fraser.

>>5932299
I'm surprised he's still writing books, but yes, probably

>>5932265
Actually aristocracy in the 13th was already not completely like he describes, see>>5932254

>>5931259
Maybe if you would grow your hair out you disgusting dyke.

David Bowie, is that you?

>>5931259
yes'm. It would be my pleasure.