/lit/ - Literature

>>5911841
No you stupid robot

No he was a sexist fuckbag who hopped on the misogyny bandwagon because it helped him feel better about not being attractive to women.

He hit the nail on the head about how he feels, not really much more than that. He isn't using any sort of system of reasoning or empirical evidence to support this, it rests solely upon the reader applying confirmation bias.

It's tweet-tier.

>>5911849
He is a fugly little thing

>>5911851
>implying that isn't all non-analytical philosophy

men can resolve their differences by just fucking off and doing their own thing. women need everyone to get along because that's just their role. that means it takes less to make them do something excessive.

>>5911883
women can resolve their differences by agreeing to place group stability and peace as the prime objective. men always need to shit on someone because that's just their role, that means it takes less to make them do something excessive

>>5911841
how does this misogynistic shit fly in 2014? go back to /b/ you asshole

MODS MODS

>>5911887
not really what I'm talking about. if group stability goes it's really bad for women and not so much for men.

>>5911864

>>5911888
Not OP, but posing a question isn't making an assertion.

Furthermore, indifference is the opposite of love, no?

>>5911887
explain

>>5911919
Can't have love without hate, but indifference requires neither

>>5911841
>This thread.

>no one who has actually read the source of this quote has criticized it yet
Didn't expect anything less, given the SJW shithole this board has turned into.

>>5911925
Actually it's been very /pol/ refugee lately.

>>5911925
Well to be fair I'd say that

>>5911846
>>5911849
>>5911864
>>5911888
Are just intentional shitposts

Is this SJW central or am I being rused?

Shitposting is so common on 4chan it's almost impossible to tell if anything I read on this site is truth or bullshit.

>>5911929
/pol/ was always here.
/pol/ was always everywhere.
Now that /pol/'s gone, it gives people an excuse not to engage in the argument, but to call upon the /pol/ boogeyman. It's their only defense.

>>5911874
It's some, like 10%. Most philosophy is predicated upon a specific system of logic, or historical or philological evidence..

>>5911934
I have this problem on /lit/
the shitposting is often very very subtle so I have trouble distinguishing actual /pol/-tier and SJW dumbasses from ironic shitposting

>>5911934
Probably half the people here are in favor of social justice. Many cannot handle being labeled SJW, because 'it's not the kind of thing that marx, adorno, benjamin, deleuze, etc. would have wanted'; it's undermining the good fight against the capitalist uberclass. Needless to say, they are egalitarians none the less.

>>5911939
We've always had a fair amount of rightwing regulars, and an odd burst of actual /pol/ posters, but the "SJW" boogeyman has never been here. These letters are only brought up by people like you, you poor wounded boy.

>>5911849
>academics praise men like shakespeare and schopnehauer because they disregarded societal norms in favor of their own thoughts
>"their misogyny was just a product of the times!"
It's an effective ad hominem though.

>>5911976
I kind of agree with this, but that insult at the end is just pathetic and patronising. You seem opposed to discrimination on a societal scale, yet you're the first to fling impotent shit like this at those you disagree with this.

>>5911976
>no u

>>5912006
>>5912007
>tripfag posts shit
What did you expect? Just report and move on

>>5912000
they disregard some of the norms but abide others

like, say, aristotle had quite unspecific ideas about the nature of divine but supported slavery just like a common ancient greek

>>5912011
A song for Schopenhauer fans

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dLPsw3i_P8

>>5911976
>poor wounded boy

Lold. Wtf is this

>>5912026
That post had nothing to do with the post you were replying to.

>>5912024
I wouldn't say abide. I'm not denying that they were more open to certain ideas due to their cultures, but it's dishonest to handwave on that account because it implies that out cultural assumptions are more valid.

Basically, I doubt Aristotle supported slavery solely because he was culturally influenced to.

>>5912044

>it implies that out cultural assumptions are more valid
it merely implies that some of their ideas can be attributed to their society, not to them breaking from the norms of their society, the evaluation that those ideas of theirs which don't fit our modern norms are wrong is on you...

well, that's true for our modern thinkers too, they are partially open to the new ideas and partially are influenced by the modern society

also the modern ethics and philosophy is the result of thousand years of thinking and enhancing, may be it's a bit optimistically, but we probably can believe that it got better

as for aristotle, he thought that some people are 'natural slaves', obviously it's not something which is acceptable for our modern post-christian humanist ethics...

>>5912040
Subtext, anon. It was cool music about animals to sooth the buttmad Schoppy sissy. :3

Enough about human rights.

Women are solipsists. That may be why he calls them enemies, because they tend to only ever think of themselves they are naturally opposed to everyone (or at least everyone that can't be harmonically subsumed into their own individual universe).

He hit the ol reefer a little too often if you know what I mean

Imagine a life where you have never been great at anything, never felt the urge to be great at anything, never felt that magnetic admiration to someone who was great at something, wanted to imitate and ultimately defeat him. Just nothing. Literally all you do in life is exist. Occupy space. pass the time. You're a chick.

You're bored, as usual, tweeting about your fucking hair and not even feeling any kind of happiness from it, just soothing your constant need to be bitter and cunty and petty toward other women. Every single thing you've done in the past year was mundane, shallow, and boring. You spent the last six hours reading kinda-interesting Reddit stories about people who made interesting Halloween hats for their kids or some stupid bullshit that you think is interesting and you may say is interesting but you're not really sure if it's really interesting. You're just fucking sitting there, gestating, fermenting, with a moist hole between your legs that guarantees you'll at least never have to get up and move around and work to support yourself.

And then you see men, over in some corner, having fun. You've never seen this before. What are they even doing? Instead of their consciousnesses merely sitting in their thick skull and revolving around itself, they are imbuing their conscious energy and intentionality into external objects, crafts, goals, projects. All the bitterness and cuntiness you feel nonstop seems to be absent, as they congratulate each other for being victorious, and happily learn from someone who defeated them. These creatures are truly content to be alive. They have found purpose in a purposeless universe.

And your gaze turns back on itself, on your self, and you realise you've never had that. You can never have it. You're just a stupid cunt.

So you get up, you walk over there, and you fucking ruin everything. Just ruin the whole fucking thing. The five seconds of attention you get will be worth destroying it. Because you're a woman.

>>5912539
>So you get up, you walk over there, and you fucking ruin everything. Just ruin the whole fucking thing. The five seconds of attention you get will be worth destroying it. Because you're a woman.

who is yoko ono

>>5912539
u sound bitter af. It may be because I'm drunk, but I laughed a good deal reading this bs.

>>5912562
who hurt you?

>>5912127
I thought lesbians liked sissies?

>>5912539
Bravo.

>>5912539
Spot on.

>>5912539
Goddamn I wish this weren't true. I used to regard Schopenhauer with anger whenever I read his essay on women.

I guess it's just evolution m8s

>>5911849
Yeah because that is the only conceivable reason for disliking how women act.

>>5912539
Prose reminds me of DFW for some reason...

>>5912539
Spoken like someone who gets a mental image of women from 4chan and Reddit, but who never actually associates with them.

>>5912539

lol, this appeared on r9k but I remember posting it on lit soon after it was first posted

>>5912584
>>5912588
>>5912595
you realize it's a pasta, right?

>>5912024
Greek slavery was not chattel slavery

>>5912602
Delicious pasta.

>>5912597
>Implying if he associates with them he will find out he is wrong.

>>5912608
He will. I don't care if it's pasta or if you're trolling. I do find it funny, though, that this attitude is especially pervasive amongst those who can't get women. Just like the antinatalists on here who justify their virginity with their bullshit, those who believe this pasta have never interacted extensively with a driven, intelligent woman. They shun what they can't have because they're weak and petty. They do exist, and in abundant numbers outside of 4chan.

>>5912632
>>5912597
every single response to anything critical of women is always
>i bet ur a virgin/beta who can't get with the ladies

it's technically not ineffective in pissing off misogynists and it's probably even true half the time but all you'redoing is displaying how obsessed you are with virginity, and women's capacity to bestow freedom from its odious curse

whether an actual asspained woman or just a grovelling beta, get a new schtick, you're hurting your own side in the long run, and literally no one is chalking up your brownie points to give you a pity lay for towing the party line

fag

>>5912602
No shit

>>5911849

>not being attractive to women

This is a troll right? The guy was a womanizer. He had no problem fucking women.

>>5912653
I don't understand where the "ur a verjin" meme comes from. It's usually sexually sucessful men who dislike women. Hell, even most normal guys will express contempt for them. Not that they're right of course.

>>5912539

Round of applause for anon.

>>5911841
Old Schoppen-poppen-women-boppan had quiet an arm to him.

>>5912670
women conflate a man's attractiveness with his worth as a human being

if he's so unattractive that he can't have sex, he must be a bad person