/lit/ - Literature

>>5851153
kek

His greatest painting.

>>5851178
It's a stereotype, I know, but that's really bad.

>>5851244

>>5851244
And this

>>5851253
>>5851249
Yeah, being compteent at conceptual art is actually beter than failing at realism.

>>5851259
Rrrrrrriiiiiggggghhhhhttttt.

>>5851253
Implying Hitler was a good painter.

Wow, OP, that's my favorite book too!

>>5851268
Literally gay.

>>5851268
Yeah, if you want to paint the world a it is, but fail at perspective and light, you fail. If yyou use odd perspective and lighting to make point, you succeed.

>>5851279
>if you want to paint the world a it is, but fail at perspective and light, you fail.
lollllllllllllllllll

>>5851288
Are you this retarded? Really? That painting looks the way it does because von Gogh wanted it to, not because he couldn't get his shit together. Adolf's pantings, on the other hand, try to be realistic and fail.

>>5851153
I like Odilon Redon.

>>5851279
Mabye, but then again, maybe the art of painting was just ruined by Cezanne

>>5851279
not always

>>5851279

Rrrrrrriiiiiggggghhhhhttttt.

good thread

>>5851300
Nothing wrong with cezanne, or impresinsm in general. Judgin from his style, maybe Adolf should have gotten more into that, if alone because blurring the lines would have concealed his incompetence.

ITT: what happens when /pol/ is shut down

>>5851315
All boards now are /pol/.

>>5851253
That abstract art would actually require a very good understanding of the human form to produce. Just because it doesn't aim for realism doesn't mean it doesn't take skill. That's like saying chocolate cake sucks because it's not spicy enough. The aim is completely different.

>>5851304
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

>>5851320
Yup, blame moot.

>>5851321
>That abstract art would actually require a very good understanding of the human form to produce.
Can you explain specifically how? (or recommend a good book on it, I'm curious)

>>5851249
>>5851253
so if i think hitler was a bad painter i'm a liberal?

>>5851320
/pol/ is still there.

They need to just be the robots they've always been.

OP here, can't you shitheads post one painting while you argue? Look how easy it is:

>>5851244
>>5851259
>>5851269
>>5851279
It's an undeniable truth that most of the rightists are more likely to be into Impressionism rather than others like Surrealism, Cubizm or abstract art. But it is also brainwashingly retarded to argue that Hitler's impressionistic paintings are bad.

pic: Hopper had a way of communicating his inner life...feelings of despair and desolation, as well as his sense of beauty...finding them in the buildings and objects he painted. He filled empty rooms with the mystery of existence and his own spirit. In essence, he, like Van Gogh, was painting not just the objects themselves, but turning them literally into self-portraits.

>>5851326
It's much less derivative painting human bodies in such a way, you have no direct reference to work off like in realism and must reinvent the wheel somewhat so to speak. You must have an learned understanding of anatomy in your mind, depicting from scratch multiple bodyparts in abstraction that combine together to make an aesthetic whole that triggers our recognition and appreciation of the human form. It's really not as easy as it looks.

Pic related: abstract art by Emil Nolde, member of the Nazi party.

>>5851350
Every artist I've known has called Hitler a mediocre painter. Not terrible, but nothing amazing.

>>5851360
Ok I can agree with that, fuck those artists anyway.

pic: I've painted it when I was 17. It's true that I have a type of talent which Dali had, when he was 6...

>>5851350
Fuck off you idiot, this is /lit/. As in literature. What do your shitty paintings have to do with literature? Nothing. You have no say over what these other idiots do in your shitty thread because it doesn't even belong on this board

>>5851360
pic forgotten.

>>5851320
Cry some more, faggot.

Dali made a lot of bizarre and extravagant paintings but some of my favorites by him are the ones that are strange in a more subdued way, e.g. pic related, which is incidentally a painting of himself at age 6

>>5851379
What kind of paint did you use? Looks like oils. I paint too but mostly minimalist garbage

>>5851376
>Ok I can agree with that, fuck those artists anyway.

Lol, you agree with them, but fuck those guys? Why? Real rebel without a cause, dipshit.

>>5851404
sun in the left
shadows on the left
okay
- "Dalicate", anonymous