[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 28 KB, 444x601, GRAV.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
537420 No.537420 [Reply] [Original]

so /lit/ what are some nihilist yet some what spiritual, existentialist philosophers?

>> No.537432
File: 38 KB, 539x422, 1270875745673.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
537432

>> No.537433

>>537429
Not Nihilist.

But definitely read him, OP.

>> No.537434

Hegel

>> No.537429

>>537420
Kierkegaard.

>> No.537441

Nihilist but existentialist? In other words, you're searching for existentialist philosophers?

Camus?
Nietzsche?
Sartre?

>> No.537442

>>537433
If you say Kierkegaard isn't nihilist, then you're not following him on the dismal results of hermeneutics. His pessimism about the nature of reading is almost Deluzian.

>> No.537444

op here. what would be good to start with Kierkegaard, and keep in mind that im trying right now to get into philosophers. i tried Nietzsche and he was alright, just painstaking to read

>> No.537454

camus seems pretty cool, would anyone recommend The Rebel?

>> No.537453

>>537444
Kierkegaard isn't easy. He's a combination of hermeneutics (how to read documents) and theology. He also writes wickedly.

>> No.537458

>>537444
If Nietzsche was hard the Kierkegaard will fuck you in the ass with a pineapple.

>> No.537461

>>537458
ill have to work my way up then i suppose, how about camus?

>> No.537467

Kierkegaard is pretty much the definition of OP's request. Just try The Sickness Unto Death. It's short.

>> No.537474

>>537467
alright thanks, ill pick it up at barnes and nobles

>> No.537505
File: 82 KB, 550x400, MGAwesome_wtfareyoutalkingabout.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
537505

>nihilist
>yet spiritual
>existentialist

>> No.537510
File: 132 KB, 310x459, Kierkegaard.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
537510

>>537474

>> No.537887

>>537510

You leave Soren out of this lol

>> No.537889

Worst part is I was confusing him with Klimt.