/lit/ - Literature

>>5354797
only physically

Yes, of course. What century do you live in?

Not inferior. Just different.

If women were capable of building houses, fighting wars, thinking, then society would make them do so. They just weren't fit for it.

Also, a great historical example is Ancient Greece were there were several philosophical clubs that supported women, like Pythagoras' house, Epicurus' Garden etc.. But yet none of them contributed anything, even though encouraged to do so.

Same goes for today, a lot of women finish the best Uni's and yet never contribute to the field they finished. A great example that shows us that women can only memorize, but not think, because nature didn't make them to think.

>>5354804
Le wrong 1

In terms of art production, sure they are.

Did you know women suffer less emotionally than men? While they suffer from lovesickness they cry and call their friends. Men eat all that shit, and while suffering more they take it out producing art.

That's some biological shit, don't blame the patriarchy for this one

at some things, yes. better at others though so it balances out

>>5354802
nah. i'm tired with gendered sports division. it's pointless for 99% of them

>>5354813
>That's some biological shit
My eyes are spinning here.

Men and women are both shit, but each with a different smell.

>>5354813
>art is the product of emotional suffering
this explains /lit/'s pleb taste of muh edginess muh misanthropy

They have smaller brains on average - scientifically proven.

>>5354833

Men suffer from a heartbreak more than women do. Google that. There are hundreds of studies on that. And a heartbreak is not a joke or superficial thing. People grieve from that. People suffer and while less intense than a death, it is serious.

>>5354842

Not emotional suffering, but art is indeed the product (I'm being super simplistic but this sums it up) of emotional experience and knowledge.

>>5354802
>only physically

>>5354817
facts: women have smaller muscles and a higher concentration of fatty tissues + less values of testosterone.

Said that, it's not an excuse for being fat, butterfly

>>5354855
What makes you think it is not sociological? Men do all sorts of stuff that women don't, yet some of it can be easily tied to social aspects of gender roles.

>>5354807
This. Different strengths and in general different values

Of course they are, they lack the mental stoicism, they're opportunists and they run mostly on emotions.

No, you're just too inferior to work out you're being played. Too late to save you this lifetime. Eat lots of soy products they inflate your oestrogen count, it might stop you from being taken hook, line, and sinker.

>>5354877
facts: sports isn't a competition in the amount of test or muscle concentration

>>5354882
In short they are irrational witches. DROWN THEM ALL!

>>5354878
From where does society come from? Is not society a sum of its individuals?

>>5354872
>>5354797
Read a book

>>5354894
an example: http://www.topendsports.com/sport/tennis/men-v-women.htm

No, they're simply good at different things, such as agility, multitasking and social intelligence. They don't need to be physically strong because they're good at mind games and shit.

Both writing and reading are considered feminine hobbies because that's one of the things females are better at. Communication and expression.

One of the reasons for males standing out more is that we're the gender of extremes. We're likely to be either brilliant or full retard while most women are close to average. Also, since women have their child-bearer role, they've literally been in the kitchen for most of history. They've only started getting jobs and doing shit with their lives recently, give them some time.

>>5354902
Lol, hell no. That's like the first thing you learn in a 101 sociology class: society is not a sum of its individuals, it is relations among individuals. Besides, the statement is nonsensical since societies change at rapid speed compared to what we call biological aspect, individuals can go from one society to another in their lifetime and change their behavior.

Men are better in the qualities we care to measure in this cultural paradigm. But I guess that's why we are going to hell.

I don't think I could have a relationship with a woman. I don't take them seriously at all. I would prefer a relationship with a man and receive only sexual gratification from women.

>OP is a closet homosexual

>>5354907
in most olympic disciplines women wouldn't even be able to attend without the sex segregation

>>5354930
Lol, who gives a shit about sports performance? There are more important ways women are thought to be inferior.

it's thougher for women because they are "supposed" to be the child care giver. The few women that escape this biological mindset are still held behind by other people. Then the few that have high hopes and aren't being put "in their place" by society still have to be geniuses to do anything worthwhile. So you can imagine this is a .0000000001% chance of happening. While for men you just have to be a genius which is .00001% so it's easier
So yea no women did quite make it yet because of all these things, but I don't think they are inferior biologically

>>5354907
5 examples wow. that is pretty definitive

i don't really give a shit if women are worse than men. if they are, let them lose.
it's pretty much a fact that whites are inferior to blacks, yet there's no race segregation.

>>5354928
>sexual gratification from women
faggot pussy

>>5354960
you bitch a faggot?

>>5354905
You mean read biased propaganda? As for the "read a book" argument, Butterfly, you should know that using such trite and platiduninous 3rd rate witticisms is a testament to your own obvious stupidity.

>>5354943
I don't really care about sports, but it was being talked about in a misleading way so I correct something
y u mad tho

>>5354999
It was a twitter sized book recommendation.
It isn't propaganda. It's scholarly and balanced, from what I've read. It promises to be as great as it's reputation gives it.

>>5354912
>Both writing and reading are considered feminine hobbies

But that's not true...

I am a genuine, bonafide /r9k/er who has only had women by paying for prostitutes.

I believe that women are probably equal mentally (ignoring the possibility of really extreme dumb/smart men). But they live lives on easy mode so they have a much lower incentive to do anything "great". That's it.

>>5355000
>y u mad tho
Just dissatisfied by unimportant discussions. But I'm on 4chan, so why am I even complaining.

>>5355020

Agree. It is a problem of gender roles, and it suck. Women would be even more attractive if they acknowledge that they should be in the disposition of being whatever they want instead of "females".

I'm not bad with women, but find an interesting one is one hell of a deal.

>virgin bait
>37 replies and 3 image replies omitted

Get laid, you fucking losers.

>>5355058
>le epic shame meme

Lol women are truly pathetic

They're generally shallow and superficial, lacking the advances that men have made over the years. They have their uses for society, they enforce social norms and provide outlets for men in a number of ways. Women hardly know what they want but astute men do. Primal compulsions and social norms produce women to seek out the daring and brash men. The men who are calm, collected, and engaging. While these men are exiting for women, they ultimately don't have the nesting instinct that women also want.

The paradox for women can be summarized as the following:

They want men who are strong, assertive and engaging.

They grow subtle resentment for men who've they have managed to manipulate into a provider.

That's why women are nearly as likely to cheat as men. Women cheat for emotional needs first and physical needs second. The man cheats because he likes sex with new women, the emotions are hardly relevant to him.

>>5355020
>But they live lives on easy mode so they have a much lower incentive to do anything "great".
Are you for real? There's plenty of women who would like to do something great, if their hopes haven't been squashed yet, but they struggle precisely because they are supposed to "live on easy mode".

>>5355062
Did I hit a nerve? How often do you cry over "tfw no gf"?

>>5354959
Calm down, man. Women are objectively physically different, therefore they play in different leagues.
Your race comparison is pretentious, I hope that you're just trolling.

>>5355071
>>5355071
How does this make sense at all. Because of affirmative action, any woman with two brain cells to rub together is guaranteed scholarships and prestigious university places in any field dominated by men. My own university, like most universities, has an entire "Women in Physics" section just to cater to women, help them do well in courses, network with professors, etc. Men don't get anything like that. Women indisputably live on easy mode, there is no longer anyone to blame for their lack of success but themselves.

>>5354862
women tend to be more emotionally intelligent than men so that explains why their art is better

>>5355080

classic butterfly

>>5355080
Your Rand is showing.

>>5355086
>>5355087
Maybe you shitposters could try refuting the point instead of shitposting even harder.

lol so much amateur evolutionary biology itt

>>5354797
Yes

>>5355080
Same story with blacks. That doesn't stop them from bitching about The Man.

>>5355093

Very supreme post, my fellow gentleman. I tip my virginity to you. I always use my tears as lube while masturbating to the flashbacks of rejection. Try it out, it's much better than the sex we'll never have.

they have the potential to be as good as men were, but they're treated like babies so they act like babies. men are starting to receive the same treatment, so we will be equal enough soon.

>women
>not antithetical to civilization

I think Hesiod must have been right about the origin of women.

>>5355100

This is always the most shallow of all "arguments"

You can criticize women while having respect for them. The same applies for men, no sex is perfect.

>>5355080

Yes I agree with this. This whole "poor women being kept down" stuff is bullshit.

And no, I don't give a shit about 40 years ago or what it's like in bongobongostan where the women are cattle or whatever

>>5355080
>>5355092
>>5355105
Read. a. fucking. book, dude. >>5354905

>>5355086
Obvious fake

every so often I forget that this board consists mostly of the dregs of society who have no idea how to interact with men or women, but then a thread like this comes along and I remember

>>5355118
Stop impersonating me.

>>5355123
this "argument" is never going to be clever or original

>>5355128
it wasn't an argument

>>5355124
>>5355118
STOP COPYING ME YOU CUNTS

>>5355135
i know, it was unoriginal tripe that might as well have been posted by a bot

Yes, of course.

>>5355138
if you think the opinions in this thread are enlightened perspectives on gender, or even "normal," you need a lot more help than I can give you

>>5354797

Why a thread like this one is not banned and people actually discuss without rage or freaking out but threads were someone asks if people from the black race are less intelligent always make a big commotion?

>>5355104
>no sex is perfect

You cannot talk about sex. You never experienced what it feels like.