/lit/ - Literature

Yes: "no fun aloud"

every fucking work leading up to mein kampf if you really wanted an honest answer

>>5111717
>every work that advocates a certain kind of modesty
>leading up to Mein Kampf

Eh... I haven't read it but I have a hard time believing that.

>>5111745
There's the entire western thought, not just Nietzsche, then there's political work by tons of Germans, French and Spanish political figures prior to WWII.

Everything prior to the genocide was fairly critical of being too loquacious, indulgent and fanciful.

>>5111713
Depends if it's epicurean hedonism or not.

>>5111713

Good is generally pleasurable, but we don't celebrate those who only pursue pleasure.

>>5111745
Then you have a huge boom of literature in the 50's and so on about every topic you can think of, written in every way you can think of, with no bars held on form, tautology or anything.

I would think your post is a trolol but I can't risk the thought. Hedonism beyond the philosophical concept and the form of literary being is very important.

Hedonism suddenly doesn't mean "indulgent behavior for all things pleasurable" it's a much more widely defined ideal.

>>5111713
you have to live in service of something greater than pleasure or pleasure will eat you alive and you'll kill yourself.

Advancement

>>5111842
/lgbtq/

La Dolce Vita

>>5111713
A really basic critique is that hedonism often leads to short term gains for long term pain. But rational hedonism would overcome this pretty easily.