/lit/ - Literature

Max Stirner

Robert Anton Wilson

>>5043584

Nobody. He was the last call.

>>5043609
If that is the case (it's not), who did he evolve from?

>>5043596

>>5043560
Freud and Lacan

>>5043610
An ape. We've always been the same, anon, it's merely our capacity for introspection that's grown. (That said, however, Christianity seems to have always been a few steps ahead of Nietzsche, depending on your perspective. Also, you kinda can't rightly compare certain philosophers, as conviction plays largely into it too, and that's merely a matter of preference, or settling in some cases.)

>>5043622
This is also why people are dumb when they offer up books that they say lend to the culture of whatever place, too, btw. Pretty much 100% of a place's culture is geographically induced.

>>5043622
Are you referring to how the church accepted Darwinian evolution while Nietzsche denied it?

>>5043641
>>5043644
Trolling as performance art

>>5043647
No. I'm referring to Christian philosophy vs. Nietzschean philosophy.

>>5043568

>>5043650
Christian philosophy is basically the denial of the ubermensch.

Oh, I forgot #2.

>>5043655
Love these

>>5043650

There is no christian philosophy, it's just fragmented learning from the bronze age with modern mental acrobatics to put it all together.

>>5043688
No. Christian philosophy, or rather theology, is the philosophical justification of, depending on the denomination, beliefs held by the denomination.

>>5043688
Oh, but there is. Christian doctrine is a solid answer to the human condition, not some random assortment of stories.

A lot of that green pill stuff is just dumb, but it is funny.

>>5043748
That's the point. It was made by /x/ to troll /pol/. Like how /jidf/ makes those /polgbt/ comics to troll.

>>5043748

>Ice cream isn't good for you, but it is tasty.

>>5043754
I figured, but then it's a mark of mental unwellness too.

>>5043762
>tasty
One of the worst words.

>>5043762
Spot on.

>>5043560
Where the highest achievement for Schopenhauer is the man who denied his will, Klíma conversely suggests that the realization of one’s own will is the primary achievement. This brings Klíma close to Nietzsche with his will to power liberating itself from the bounds of the bourgeois world and affirming itself. Klíma's individuality lies not only in his conception of philosophy, but also in his attempt to conform to it in his personal life. His autobiographical writings illustrate his attempts to grasp his own power and to shout his "Deus sum" ("I am God"). He tested his own deity in a life without any money, and in non-conformism that rejected all conventions, including a job. All this was to lead Klíma to control of self. However, Klíma also had friends and patrons who supported him in difficulties. Utrpení knížete Sternenhocha (The Sufferings of Prince Sternenhoch: Prague 1928) is his most famous novel. In a series of journal entries, the book chronicles the descent into madness of Prince Sternenhoch, who moves from the life of a nobleman to a life filled with suffering, eccentricity, bouts of madness and self-torment. Having sunk to the lowest level, he eventually attains an ultimate state of bliss and salvation.

>>5043785
Are the will to live and the will to power the same thing?
Is the will to power about knowledge/understanding or action?

>>5043851
The will to power is everything; Nietzsche regarded it the singular instinct in man.

>>5043876
So it isn't even a will?

>>5043876
And, in fact, it is.

>>5043877
It's more a drive than a will.

>>5043688
t
i
p
s

f
e
d
o
r
a

>tfw nobody reads Nietzsche here
Neetsch wrote about the stages in western philosophy. Zarathustra is the evolved form of Nietzsche.

read you niggers: http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/coveyripper.html

>>5043707
i understand the picture is somewhat of a joke, but there seems to be truth to it