[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 528 KB, 1000x667, women-upset-after-sex.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5030790 No.5030790[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

any philosophers/thinkers which theorize about sex (physical contact)? bonus points if it's not a feminist work (not against feminism, but their critiques are boring).

>> No.5030792

>>5030790
check the archive, faggot

>> No.5030819

>>5030792
shut the fuck up cunt I will fucking cut you you piece of shit

>> No.5030829

>>5030819
>shut the fuck up cunt I will fucking cut you you piece of shit
This thread is bananas.

>> No.5030831

>>5030790

I just read this short essay/pamphlet by Platonov called Anti-Sexus and it was pretty awesome:

http://simongros.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Platonov-Anti-sexus-Cabinet-2013.pdf

here's a quote from charlie chaplin about it

>I’m against the Anti-Sexus. It doesn’t allow for intimacy, for the living interaction of people’s souls, but it’s this interaction that’s always foremost whenever the sexes unite, even in those cases when the woman is a commodity. This interaction has its own value, independent from sexual intercourse: it’s that fleeting feeling of friendship and sweet affinity, that feeling of your loneliness meltingaway, that no antisexual mechanism can give. I’m for the actual closeness of people, for them breathing into each other’s mouths, for one pair of eyes gazing straight into another, for how you truly feel your own soul duringthe crude act of intercourse, and for enriching it at the expense of some other soul that just happened along. This is why I’m against the Anti-Sexus. I’m for the living,suffering, laughable, stuck-in-a-rut human being who blows his stock of meager life-juice just to feel a moment of fraternity with another derivative being. And I’m also against all this mechanized stuff because I am, was, and ever shall be for what’s real, for what’s pitiful and laugh-able, but alive ... and poised to become powerful.—Charlie Chaplin

>> No.5032189

>>5030790
sex is a false pretense to life

>> No.5032373
File: 130 KB, 567x397, foucault43.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5032373

Michel Foucault

>> No.5032379

Aquinas

>> No.5032388

Check these dubs.

>> No.5032402

>>5030831

Charlie Chaplin, a god amongst men.

>> No.5032430
File: 447 KB, 1000x1507, TheProblemsOfPhilosophersI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5032430

>> No.5032434
File: 347 KB, 1000x1507, TheProblemsOfPhilosophersII.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5032434

>> No.5032444

>>5032430
>>5032434
these are hilarious, more pls

>> No.5032449

>>5032388
noice

>> No.5032454

Schopenhauer

>> No.5032455

>>5032444
Don't think more exist.

>> No.5032461

>>5032455
Aren't those from the philosophy webcomic?

>> No.5032462
File: 34 KB, 500x560, schopenhopper.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5032462

>>5032454

>> No.5032482

>>5030790
>be on public computer
>browsing through work others have left on there
>find something on business, open it
>shitty thesis statement "in this essay I will talk about bosses in the workplace"
>goes off in a tangent about masculinity in the first body paragraph, spewing a pseudo-feminist word salad.

How do I cope with reading this shit /lit/?

>> No.5032484

>>5032482
You don't.

>> No.5032489

>>5032482

As in 'soldier on and read through until the end' or 'cope with the reality of having read so far'?

>> No.5032500

>>5032484
But I have severe anxiety issues, and have to compare myself to others at every opportunity.

I can either cringe or self-loath.

>> No.5032504

>>5032482
Did you mean to say, 'quasi-feminist', as in it appears feminist but is actually incoherent?

>> No.5032505

>>5032500
Then cringe, for all it's worth.

>> No.5032515

>>5032489
The latter. I give up if it's horrible, but I always read the conclusions.

>> No.5032552
File: 526 KB, 900x3218, 2013-11-10Freud hour part 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5032552

>>5032444

>> No.5032553

>>5032504
I don't think "word salad" was a good way for me to describe it. It was coherent (as in readable) but it had no logical structure; It was claim after claim, mixed with feminist jargon. There weren't even any suppositions. It's like I was peer-editing the kid who "lists facts" back in high school, except they weren't facts.

>> No.5032898
File: 80 KB, 812x830, 0751.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5032898

recommend me someone extremely conservative and negative/pessimistic views on sex

some real anti-sex stuff

>> No.5032951

>>5032898
http://therightstuff.biz/2013/04/14/anti-piv-abstinence-radical-feminist-style/

>> No.5033001

>>5030790
Karol Wojtyła

>> No.5033038

>>5030790
Evola?

>> No.5033078

Freud, Lacan
You know it's true, resistance is futile

>> No.5033104

>>5032951
that's not really what I was looking for

>> No.5035095

>>5033078
I love me some Lacan.

>> No.5035121

>>5033001
kek

>> No.5035134

>>5032434
>god damn freedom!
kek