/lit/ - Literature

>>5030080
Dude, it's all the same shit. Nothing's changing or getting better or even different but by all means pick any colour you like.

>>5030080
Good book but you're talking out your arse

Buddhism and egoism fit hand in glove

Stirner's "ego" is defined bodily.

>>5030151
this should just be the sticky

>>5030151
wow within 3 posts

>>5030126
There are numerous similarities between Max Stirner's philosophy and Buddhism: the idea that the Self is a construct resulting from "backward-thinking" (reflecting, re-presenting) on "our" part, for one example. Stirner observed that what one "is" is not really what one "is", but is merely a representation of what one "is", and a very limited -- and more importantly, a LIMITING -- one at that. The Buddha calls this "Ego-clinging", and is not only illusory but is constraining. As Nagarjuna observed, our Egos are real AND illusory -- we "are" here, but we "are not". This is why many who understand what Stirner was getting at prefer the term "the Unique" to "the Ego". Stirner did NOT believe in a true, independent Ego, as if it were some sort of spirit within us. He would have said that to believe in an individual Ego that exists on its own merit would be "religious thinking", something he was OBVIOUSLY opposed to. He says that concepts are mere "spooks", and it is obvious that "Egos" are mere spooks that owe more to the tradition of "ghosts" and "spirits" and "souls" than to anything else. But what he DOES mean by Ego is that unnameable, unique SOMETHING that is the locus of experience (what often people refer to as the "mind", but ... that's just another concept, another spook, outside of the realm of the REAL.)
Just as in Buddhism and Taoism, Max Stirner was critical of dualistic thinking -- his philosophy is decidedly non-dualistic, just as Buddhism and Taoism is. He understood that the self is conditioned by all that is observed EACH MOMENT and is therefore ALWAYS in flux. The Buddhists would call this "impermanence" -- each moment our "self" (which is merely an illusion, a construct, a "spook" to use Stirner's term) dies and is reborn the moment we think of it again, but it is always different, just as every moment is different from the previous moment. Stirner underlined this fact by saying that who he was last moment he would no longer be the next moment, and "he" had no loyalty to his "past selves".
"The name is not the thing named." Buddhism also asks us to get beyond "mere concepts", "mere words", as, obviously, Stirner did. And every time I say "I am (such and such)", I am merely conceptualizing myself, not really presenting myself. I can't present what comes before conceptualization, all I can do is present the re-presentation, which is only a copy of the original, NOT the original. Time and space conditions us all -- again, the person I am right now will NOT be the same person I am the next moment, but then again -- it will be, in a manner.
This moment to moment living, this being born, dying, and being "reincarnated" each moment echoes, obviously, in Buddhism and Taosim, albeit in a more "religious" manner more often than not (except in the more philosophical traditions of Buddhism and Taoism).
-source: some guy on yahoo

>>5030218
Somehow, I feel there could be a place for some Heideggerian stuff to complement that.

Goddamn it Byington why did you choose to translate Einzige as "Ego"? You knew this would happen. You knew it and you did it anyway. You opened Stirner up to a million uneducated idiots on just that mistranslation alone. You could have stopped it Steven. You could have nipped it in the bud and prevented all of this.

On a positive note, I am patiently awaiting Wolfi Landstreicher's new translation "The Unique and Its Property".

Also, this should be required reading for entering a Stirner thread:
http://littleblackcart.com/Stirner-s-Critics.html

Used to be hell keen on buddhism but now I think its a dead end theory. Like why have a body, why have a physical life if all you do is shut off from the body, the mind and dwell in a life entirely devoid of the physical?

The illusion of separation is what gets me, that ultimately the highest state of buddhism seems to be entirely congruent with escapism. Why is suffering seen to be so bad? sure without desire there is no suffering but there is also no fun either.... at least with desire you might experience something but without it you will experience nothing. the only life completely compliant with buddhism seems to be a monks life with no children and the end of the species, ultimately just escapism and suicide.

And it would seem to me that suffering is inevitable... so if life is suffering anyway why not live with desire and have that chance at enjoyment.

can some explain this shit to me? yeah I understand that being one with the universe is indeed a joyful experience, but once you've done it, then what? do you just sit there in it like a junkie until you die?

>>5030356
Ditto. Used to be very "Buddhist" (zen) (as I understood it), but realized that the cessation of self led to a not unpleasant but not pleasant life either. I like pleasure, why deny myself that in pursuit of non-pleasure contentedness?

No joke that it's stoicism+ though, I definitely learned a lot about dealing with material problems from my little "Buddhist" stint.

>>5030218
>This moment to moment living, this being born, dying, and being "reincarnated" each moment echoes, obviously, in Buddhism and Taosim

Yeah, that's true. But ultimately Buddhism strives toward annihilation of the self, whereas Stirner doesn't inherently strive toward anything, although I'd say his philosophy is more conducive to a life-affirming mindset than Buddhism is.

>>5030080
>you're a number of processes
>somehow that makes individualism redundant
>somehow that makes collectivism relevant

Great argumentation.

>>5030365
Yeah I completely agree.

Its worth climbing the mountain and reaching the top... it can help you to not dwell on suffering but fucked if it isn't a pretty hollow victory to get there and realise there is no real point to getting there.

I feel as an ideology it is incomplete, only half complete.

To be born with enough intelligence and determination to reach oneness and then to sit there and do nothing with it seems incredibly selfish.... And yet, the whole ideology is ultimately about selflessness.

It seems missing something, like there should be a buddhism 2: material life strikes back and a buddhism 3: return of the buddha.

>>5030373
as much as i hate you trip fags and especially you feminister what you say about stirner seems to be far too close to my current view on life.

so my gods damned reading list grows even longer, what background reading is essential for stirner? or do i just tack that shit on the end of my start with the greeks and everything else that is listed after

I have a head for running with abstract concepts and dont get to bogged down in specific meanings of words but I dont want to reach for the dictionary every five minutes, it makes for a jarring read and easily fascinated i get distracted.

>>5030437
Stirner is probably the most accessible philosopher I've read, he requires no background reading, even though he employs Hegelian dialectic; he mentions writers, but only to counter their points, it doesn't have anything to do with his central argument.

You should look up the Wikipedia article on essentialism, then read it, and keep in mind Stirner is referring to essences when he says "spooks".

Where Stirner relates to prior thinkers, it's mostly to debunk them.

If you ever want to start with the Greeks, just remember to use the right translations and read their drama and poetry and history prior to philosophy (not only will it help to understand their culture, but it will pump you up to see their in depth though after reading about the cool stuff). And if you do it, do it for pleasure, because I am telling you that the Greeks are a fantastic literary trip that you will fucking love so long as you approach 'em right.

If you need any help on that, I'm here regularly and would be happy to assist.

>>5030437
You'll come to love her.

>>5030451
>Stirner
>philosopher

>>5030451
You should also look up the Wikipedia article on nominalism

>>5030452
<3<3<3<3

>>5030479
:DDDDDDDDDDDDDD

>>5030482
oh yes very good. That would help as well

>>5030452
lol you are even worse, dream on

can /lit/ ever go back now that feminister has pissed on the hydrant?

I actually don't get why buddhist don't just kill themselves

seems like suicide clearly follows, if you don't accept bullshit reincaration

>>5030080
Man, God is either nothing or everything. Humanity as God isn't healthy for progress.

>>5030502
what

>>5030502
>if you don't accept bullshit reincaration

>>5030502
because buddhists don't believe in the self ;^)

>>5030492
>>>/adv/14392561

>>5030510
Shit just got real

>>5030508
On a side note, Fem, do you cheq your mail still? Here's what I promised, the word 'robust' worked into an article. It was trickier than expected

>>5030515
aw, booo. i really liked her too :(
i guess being an egoist doesn't preclude you from being a snivelly faggot.

>>5030515

>>>/adv/14392610

The obliviousness in this is beautiful.

>>5030535
Yea... that whole thread is just
>help I get hit on a lot coz I'm very attractive. how do I into public fidelity for bf?

It's a question she can answer with 3 seconds' thought, but then she wouldn't be getting any attention for it.

>>5030520
Said the box stopped existing a lot earlier than it was supposed to.

This is interesting, but I don't want to threadjack so
hereismorning@hmamail.com

>>5030486
>you're even worse
I wish I was "worse"

>>5030502
They wreck their karma and reincarnate as a lower animal, bug or plant or something, and have to reincarnate all over again. Reaching "nirvana" is actual death (no not heaven. Death)

>>5030565
It's actually more about allaying my bf's insecurity. It was asked in earnest, and I'd appreciate it if you didn't drag this onto /lit/

>>5030582
>posting while tripping outside of /lit/ for personal issues
>actually using a trip as a serious 4chan identity rather than just as an autistic persona

http://www.reddit.com/register

>>5030588

Yeah, gotta echo this. Why does it matter to you that the world knows you are /lit/ tripfag while asking for relationship advice?

>>5030582
take it up with >>5030515 ma'am, I didn't drag it in here.

>>5030588
>>5030592
>>5030595
Why does it matter to anonymous?
"Oh I didn't link it here" Wrong. You are all anonymous. You all brought it here, and now you blame her. How about ignoring it.
Stop.

>>5030592
I doubt many posters there know I'm on /lit/, I post there with a trip because I'm trying to help my bf with some issues he's going through and it might help if people get a feel for him over time. Goddamn

>>5030602

>>5030608
>turning to chinese girl cartoon imageboards for long-term relationship advice

>>5030608
I expected a better rationalization from someone who reads in between posts

>>5030602
>>5030608
just noticed that the two of your are always posting in the same threads, I'm almost tempeted to say that Feminsiter and Mariposa are the same person, I mean I am not judging you because I too am a terrible triphomosexual, but on that same note I do find it interesting. I mean it's kinda nice knowing that you're creating a kind of atmosphere of posting here on /lit/ and all. I might just be slow however, maybe this was always an open secret and it's only recently I've figured you out. Either way, I like your posts, both of you, or just the one you. This is starting to look like a lot of spoiler, I think I might break up the density for a second with a single all caps wordFUCKING wow that's going to really draw in the audience now. I really think so. Anyway, I hope your problems with your BF resolve themselves, you seem like a very lovely person, and relationship problems are never fun.

>>5030602

>>5030570
>They wreck their karma and reincarnate as a lower animal, bug

Is that why you're a butterfly?

>>5030616
Hey, why not? It's free.
>>5030631
I read all of her threads (bit of a crush on her) I try not to pester too much. /lit/ needs more of her caliber of intellect

>>5030654
you're not helping despite how clever you are

>>5030654
>>5030608

Once again, Feminister and Butterfly somehow manage to be the most pathetic people on /lit/.

>most pathetic people on /lit/.
>>5030666
>>5030678

>>5030666
what?

Was that a clever ruseman?

Are you really just a stalker? Also if you are the real Mariposa, why do you post the Mariposa? I want to know more about you and why you're doing these things?

>inb4 it was all part of my plan to seem mysterious

Just tell us. Also, assuming you're the real one, are you also Feminsiter? I mean really are you?

>>5030678
Do you like my theory that they are the same person?

>unctuous tripfags
>belligerent tripfags
>conspiratorial tripfags
>pontificating tripfags
>developmentally stunted tripfags
>tripfags who post in every thread, every minute of every day, despite lacking even perfunctory knowledge of the subject at hand or the ability to express themselves verbally
>every time I get on there are more tripfags
>discussion of literature completely peripheral because of the unflagging presence of tripfags and phalanxes of anons committed to haranguing and humiliating tripfags, not that I blame them
>posts are all cyclical, with a new topic coming into rotation sporadically at best
>the new topics aren't interesting
>the old ones even less so
>general atmosphere of snottiness and one-upsmanship
>no one here seems to be very well read or perceptive regarding literature
>irony layered and abstracted ad naseum
>contrariansim

So what brings me back here night after night?

>>5030451
Hi. Stop trying to rape Stirner's philosophy to fit your own concept of feminism.

Equality of the sexes is a bigger spook than gender roles are.

I JUST CAN'T STOP CHOKING ON NIGGER COCK

>>5030706
>So what brings me back here night after night?
You have nothing else in your life. Don't feel too bad anon, I am in the same boat with you. My special lady friend is asleep in the next room and I have insomnia. I don't feel like doing any "serious" writing and I'm too bored not to be here. I have no one else to talk to because all my other friends are sleeping and other websites are usually populated by "normal" day people so there's no one else to talk to.

It's just us here tonight friend, and I'm not going to try to one up you. I said this once before, all this one upsmanship is like someone who hears someone else say
>have a nice day, and don't be a dick
and then they go out and have the best day of their lives and act like a pussy.

The internet is strange and wonderful place for strange and wonderful people.

>>5030712
just stop replying to her

what don't people understand this about tripfags?

>>5030706
Habit? Self-loathing?

>>5030721
It won't make it stop posting. It was run off of /pol/ from being anally annihilated so many times, the same needs to happen here.

>>5030724
consider the post a Rorschach test

>>5030701
I refuse to use a trip, so trolls periodically impersonate me. This one was obvious. Like this one >>5030718
Again, we are not the same person. I am older and not as well read.

>>5030712
She's one of the only people here that truly understands Stirner.

>>5030731
This is not the real me. I actually do love to have my ass pozzed up by Big Black Bucks.

>>5030731
>She's one of the only people here that truly understands Stirner.

Mariposa and Feminister confirmed for same fucking faggot.

>>5030748
>Mariposa
I'm glad this is catching on, it sounds so much better than butterfly.

>>5030706
Knowing that at any point in the day feminister could be self-satisfyingly posting bullshit without anyone calling her out on it.

>>5030727
That won't ever happen because of the natures of the respective boards.

First, /pol/ users on the whole are ideologically opposed to feminism. She was read, I suspect almost immediately, as a troll, and due to the intolerance and soft-mindedness of /pol/, she was posting on borrowed time almost from the start. Instead of humoring her, egging her on, as /lit/ does, they responded with incredulity and amusement.They didn't stonewall her, because the post frequency is just too high and the posters themselves are too undisciplined to coordinate something like complete exclusion.

She is not very intelligent or informed, but she does have a the magic ratio of arrogance to childish need for attention that make her such a success on /lit/. She's also very good at obfuscating and arguing by attrition. Anyone with any intelligence that's tried to argue with her has probably noticed, yet for some reason they continue

She is not vulnerable to personal attacks or sustained and categorical refutation. /lit/ is too craven and small to beat her down the way /pol/ did, and so our only recourse is to ignore her

>>5030758
at least the other tripfags aren't openly sycophants

Is there any way to actaully communitcate with our mod/janitor?

This board would improve so much with no name fields

>>5030773
I don't know if she's a troll, but from your words I feel that if she is a troll, she is a very skilled troll. If she is not a troll, then...

Well, you know, everything you just said.

>>5030779
It would improve with /b/style codes.

I'll say it again. Anonymous is the cancer that kills these places.

>>5030779
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3OTgTyujtE

>>5030787
>Anonymous is the cancer that kills these places
>/b/style codes
>Anonymous is the cancer
>It would improve with /b/style codes

>>5030773
>>>/adv/14393145

If one wanted to get rid of feminister this would probably be the way to do it. Would probably feel bad/skeezy about doing it myself though.

I've gotten used to daily calling out feminister on the stupid shit she says honestly. don't know how i would feel if we drove her away.

>>5030773
No, /pol/ used a combination of insults and breaking down her posts bit by bit and trashing them. Her logic was the sort of barely internally consistent trash most feminists usually post that is easily debunked or dismissed.

>>5030785
She's not skilled, /lit/ is just bad at dealing with obfuscation.

I've noticed this problem that humanities types have vs STEM types. They don't have a "bullshit" filter that can discern between internally consistent but in reality wrong arguments from arguments that fit reality.

>>5030809

Why bother? Attacking her in the /adv/ thread is one thing because she's asking for relationship advice and it's obvious that her relationship is mad unhealthy and she is a major cause of that. Her /lit/ posting is mostly completely inoffensive and uninsightful white noise, there are certainly posters I would rather get rid of.

>>5030820
I'll be honest here, I don't really read those threads because I just come here for book recommendations and the occasional writing threads. I have only ever seen her and Mariposa in those kinds of threads as well and I've never really seen any comments by her that are that inflammatory or really worth stalking a person across multiple boards with the intent of destroying them from the face of the internet. I personally have a theory; this is all done because it's a girl.

Let's be honest here, I'm obviously a guy, so in reality all you have to do is just internally say "Oh this asshole is a dumbass" and then just walk away from it. If Feminster and/or Mariposa were a dude you'd just chalk it up to liberal aesthetics and call them a dumbass. But because of the prospect of the vagina, there's a lot of really bitter hatred in these posts about this person.

Kind of reminds me of /x/ and their treatment of capslock and mia.

>>5030852
>they are only oppressing her bc she is a girl

This whole situation is really a great mirror to feminist victimology in general.

>>5030852
>I've never really seen any comments by her that are that inflammatory or really worth stalking a person across multiple boards
>it's because she's a girl!
>bitter manchildren!

Feminister samefagging.

>>5030852
My intense disdain for Feminister, and butterfly to a certain extent, is her intense preoccupation with forming some sort of presence or identity. It's like discussing ideas or thinkers isn't enough unless it can somehow be related to her personal identity.

Rei and Evola do this too but they at least have a sense of irony and self-awareness (or real autism) to excuse them. I don't mind trips in the vein of them or casemods or quentin or avatap. They have no pretense of sculpting a respected image of themselves. It's just absurd self-immolation. It's the best of what 4chan can provide us with.

Feminister is far from that kind of trip. It's even sadder/more pathetic than Rei/evola. I mean, can you imagine either of them seriously making a relationshit thread on /adv/ and fervently and sincerely defend themselves without the slightest bit of self-awareness?

>>5030864
You need to calm down, friend. You did however prove me right that this is about the fact that it's a girl. I'm not a feminist, and I'm also not a /pol/tard I'm just pointing out the obvious, especially since this is 4chan. I mean really, how do you even know this feminster person is even a female? You probably are just the unfortunate victim of an elaborate ruse that's probably still an on going thing.

I'm not used to seeing people have detailed knowledge and histories of tripfags but I'll assume that you are because you're following her from /pol/ and tracking down her posts on /adv/

Now there are a few possible reasons you're doing this:

>Feminster posted pictures of herself and she's really cute and you have a crush on her, but can't move past the school boy hair pulling, and you yourself live a terribly sad and lonely life because you are socially inept.
>You're the most skilled internet investigator and you are hunting her down to really route her from your favorite boards
And finally my lateral thinking theory.
>You yourself are feminster and you're trying to GET HYPE for yourself because who the hell would care this much, other than a self obsessed attention starved tripfriend?

I still have no ill will to her, and in reality I don't understand why you do either. I'll wait for your retort, I'm sure you'll be quite articulate.

>>5030877
Now this is what I like to see, this is a well thought out argument. I don't really know her, so I still can't pass judgement, but that does sound like something that could be an annoyance. I personally would just ignore it, but then again I do enjoy making snide remarks.

I mean really, being any kind of trip on 4chan you need to have at least the beginnings of a sense of humor.
>Even my trip is a stupid joke, because who takes anything on this site seriously? I mean really, we have a my little pony board.

I see your point though.

fuck this thread went off the rails quick....
I wasnt gone that long

>>5030877
>>5030820

two posts quoted for truth

I am only reading philosophy in an attempt to further deal with social based humans, I come from a stem background and whilst I am fine with my own well thought out theories and other stems it doesnt help me speak to those who constantly wad out their verbal and written communication with junk to inflate their own sense of self importance and I would kind of like to cut them down in real life and on the net but they talk too fucking fast and hide the point of their communication in as much junk and dialect as possible

>>5030877

>REI
>MAKING A RELATIONSHIT THREAD ON ADV

I can imagine this, and would probably pay to see it

Well you did it guys. I officially hate feminister now, after reading this and the /adv/ thread. I take back all the things I said about her: she is indeed a shallow narcissistic simple-minded attention-whore.

Also, a socialist Egoist? Ha ha, kill yourself fm.

>>5030877
>My intense disdain for Feminister, and butterfly to a certain extent, is her intense preoccupation with forming some sort of presence or identity
Same old shit. "muh anonimus" We are recognizable anonymous. Your allergy to identity is bizarre.
>Sadder/more pathetic
I don't think so.

>>5031329
So insecure.

>>5031470
I've always hated you, and I'm hating fm for the very same reason: attention-seeking, illogical, inconsistent. It's just feminister doesn't shitpost on /lit/ quite as much as you, so I had no idea how shitty she was until reading her /adv/ thread. She literally attention-whored and then refused to listen to any actual advice, cherry picking answers and arguing with people trying to help. And there you are eating up her shit with a big giant grin.

And God what the fuck is wrong with you? Can you stop following fm around and sucking her dick all day? It's getting really disgusting. You're not even fucking smart, or good at it; you do it in your shitty ignorant lofty little way. It's pathetic. Have you ever just taken a step back and examined your own life?

You know what? You'll like this: fm should dump her faggot pussy-whipped boyfriend and go out with you. You two would be perfect together. Just go scissor each other in a fire somewhere and leave us alone.

>>5031531
You, by contributing to making this thread about me, are attention-pimping me quite against my will, then you complain that I'm whoring?

Whether or not you esteem me "a good person" is meaningless to me. What does make me viscerally ill is when you work to make my character the subject of conversation here like it's a fucking gossip board.

>>5030794
>2014
>authorial intent

If you are on an anonymous image board and feel the need to craft an identity for yourself, there is something very wrong with you. Do you lack attention in life? Did people ignore you as a child?

>>5031552
How dare you come on here with a boyfriend, Feminister.

>>5031552
I'm complaining that you're whoring on /adv/, and it's given me such a reaction that I would like to point it out.

You do attention whore, by the way. Why ever tell people you let your dog lick your vagina when you were a kiddo? That helps nothing, that adds nothing but to your persona. You DON?T ignore the jabs and jeers, you relish them. Butterfly must be one of the best things in your life right now.

I don't give a damn if you don't give a damn. I do things for myself, just as you. And what makes me viscerally ill is when you call attention to yourself and then deny that you ever do.

Attention-seeking, illogical, inconsistent.

>>5031470
>>5031552
hey m8s op here, cheers for the insights am going to kill myself now

>>5031586
That's it, anon. Let it all out. Those pretty girls that never spared you any attention in return shall know your wrath.

>>5031586
The lion's share of attention called to me is because of people like you, anon. What are you adding right now?

>>5031531
Link to or screencap of the /adv/ thread?

>>5031602
It's already been posted here, that's what all this bullshit is about. Everyone talks about relationships on /adv/--that's about 90% of the topics--and there's plenty of women there, we don't stick out. It looks like an eyesore from here, but it hardly equates to grabbing the limelight there, which any poster who posts there regularly can tell you: announcing and talking about your relationships is considered quite normal.

All material is inert until, by some preoccupation of the viewer, it takes on visceral effect. If you're getting so pissed off by relationship threads, you are in fact a scornful bitch. There's no two ways about it.

>>5031618
I remember one that was about your skirt or something, I quite liked reading that.

You're actually such a qt3.14, Feminister <3
Srs tho, u should leave ur bf and we get married in vegas

>>5031598
Call me a virgin. Nice. You really got me.
This, by the way, is what's wrong with "identity". Arguments should be accepted or denied on their basis alone. Adding an identity to the mix only makes it harder for actual discussion to take place.

>>5031600
It isn't attention itself that I detest, it's calling attention to oneself. Besides, you created the problem itself when tripfagging and starting the shit. You pretend that you don't like it but you love it, it's obvious in your actions.

I am adding an undercurrent of fm hate to this board, so that hopefully we can all eventually be rid of you just as /pol/ apparently did.

I am rly intelligent and socially outgoing guy and I will feed you this bitchy anon's brains, if you like.

>>5031647
>Call me a virgin. Nice. You really got me.
I did, though. You're a bitch. Do you deny it? And let's remember that we're all only arguing for ourselves here. Are you comfortable trying to run Feminister because you are a bitch?

>>5031651
fight me irl faggot

>>5030337
Tfw I just finished my research on relating zen and Heidy

>>5030373
Dont be assuming too much about buddhism now

>Feminister makes thread about socially awkward bf
>anon cries, projects social awkwardness onto other, male trips
>Feminister's bf is "pussy-whipped faggot" --pathetic, delusionary condescension and denial
>them feels man, why no qt girl for me and my social awkwardness
It's OK, anon. Hilarious visceral reaction, you little bitch.

>>5031670
>them feels man, why no qt girl for me and my social awkwardness
No one ever said that. Nice projecting, you socially awkward little faggot.

>>5031675
You said it with your bitch anger. Hell hath no fury like a bitch scorned, right? And I get girls all the time, anon; you mad? Yes, yes, you're mad.

>>5031682
>This, by the way, is what's wrong with "identity". Arguments should be accepted or denied on their basis alone. Adding an identity to the mix only makes it harder for actual discussion to take place.
I'm being rused, but I'm OK with that.

Protip btw, anon: "Faggot" is a term applied by gay males, wishing goodness of other males towards them. And "pussy-whipped" too. I mean how the fuck can you feel superior in not loving girls? Seriously. Oh, because you have to, that's right.

The person posting under the name and trip of Feminister isn't actually Feminister, by the way. I am.

>>5031685
Pathetic rationalisations of bitch's anger. You're really getting this angry because people put names to their expression? Yeah, no. And the males that do it are just autistic, a nice ready-made societal control over those that haven't slighted you so much. Seriously, anon, this is just for yourself. Carry on being a bitch.

DAT SEXUAL FRUSTRATION, lmao

Oh, him? He's pussy-whipped. He has sex with pussy.

>>5031699
You're not making me angry. Maybe a little angry at the fact that you think calling someone a bitch is an argument, but certainly not at me being called one.

>>5031717
I'm not trying to make you angry, though, anon. I'm merely outlining how pathetic you are that you might shut the fuck up. Hilarious that you resort to that line, though. "Hurr, I'm OK with being a kissless virgin in the face of other males".

I do love the word "bitch" too. It's like the alpha version of "faggot" -- to say, "You're mine to fuck", rather, "Please love me". It evokes such the sobbing responses.

>>5030080
i dont think that it would be good for buddhism to support a mass encouragement of western middle class privilaged males to seek to enter their monasteries in tibet
i think that it would be the last thing that the real monks would want to have done to their way of life
inb4 hipsters destroy buddhism

>>5031723
Nah, I'm not mad because it's an entirely baseless claim. But OK, you're alpha, keep convincing yourself that and insulting people on Chinese image boards

>>5031782
>Chinese image boards
Yeah, I can't hurt you on Chinese image board :(
Keep crying at girls because you're a virgin, bitch.
Lmfao, you're so pathetically obvious.

>>5031790
I actually had that pathetic control feature in a story I was writing one time. That...
>fight me irl faggot
>it's chinese image board, phew
...bullshit. Well, it was a psychologist trying to define away danger by diagnosis, more removed from safety, but the same dumb, beta shit. Man, I'm a bastard, lol.

>>5032003
Gifted student of the human animal, though, IMO.

>buddhism

LOL

>>5031552

>attention-pimping
I coined that phrase BTW

Don't feel bad, guys are always going to give you shit if your smarter than them, it scares them to think we can don anything other than barefoot kitchen work and baby preparations.

>>5031552
>attention-pimping
I coined that phrase BTW

>>Don't feel bad, guys are always going to give you shit if you're smarter than them, it scares them to think we can do anything other than barefoot kitchen work and baby preparations.

>>5030373

>Buddhism strives toward annihilation of the self

Buddhism doesn't strive for continuation or annihilation. To say that Buddhism strives for anything betrays your misunderstanding of it.

>>5030373
All you had to do was pick up a simple basic buddhist intro book and that would put your ignorant statement to rest.

I was taking you quasi-seriously until you said buddhism is the only viable philosophy. You're hilarious.

>>5032377
Word.

Are there pics of feminister? I keep hearing that she's a qt

>>5036182
She's devastatingly beautiful. No there are no pictures for you to see.