/lit/ - Literature

I haven't read any of them but they're probably all shit as murderers are mindless barbarians

>>4986806
From what I've heard, the Unabomber manifesto is actually pretty thought engaging. It's on my backlog.

Breivik's manifesto is just a giant mess of copy pasted articles, questionable facts, and delusional wish thinking. I regret spending as much time on reading it as I did.

>>4986836
Unabomber was assistant professor in Mathematics at Berkeley at the age of 25, I would hardly call that "mindless". Other than that I see your point.

>>4986806
Mussolini

This is now a mass-murderer manifesto tier list thread. I'm not even joking. I've read Eliot Roger's "book" and it wasn't that great. So the Unabomber's is at the top of this list?

>>4986877
Rodger's manifesto was pretty meh-tier but it was really interesting how he detailed his life story. You could actually follow his descent into absolute insanity as a result of shitty parenting and a shallow modern culture propagated by the media that insists that you have to be getting laid constantly to have any worth as a person.

It is a documented fact that Elliot Rodger had a small penis

>>4986881
True, but also, he was crazy autist

>>4986887
Who knows? The only thing that saw it was the toilet

>>4986895
He said he did. We can take his word for that.

>>4986806

I remember reading the Unabomber one a few years ago, was impressed at the time but can't remember the details. Might read it again actually. . .

These people stand strong as evidence against the "crazy = good art" myth

>>4986905
Maybe he had body dismorphia

>>4986936
He measured it and it's about 4 inches erect apparently

>>4986806
Probably filename related since it's been published and has historical significance. The only one to which I (pretending to have read them all) can relate on intellectual grounds, to an extent, is Kaczynski's, but they all invalidate themselves on behavioral grounds, let's say.

>>4986806
>So which mass murderer manifesto has the greatest /lit/erary qualities?

The Communist Manifesto, obviously.

>>4986975
>Communist Manifesto
>what is murder
Getting /pol/ in here.

>>4986947
dude

Unabomber is the only one with any literary merit. The rest were autistic extended blog posts.

>>4986982
>manifesto of a mass murder ideology

Fits the description pretty well imo.

>>4987046
Can I get quote to support that? You know, textual evidence. Because right now this is all posturing.

>>4987050
"Rich people should be dragged out into the street and shot."
- Karl Marx

>>4987054
Is that i volume 4 of Kapital?

>>4987054
>also doesn't know what 'should' means
>nor non-literal language
You know well that a large percentage of people say something similar at some point out of frustration, etc. Marx didn't literally do this.

>>4987072
Adding to your arguments, Marx never even said that in the first place. Marx and Engels were quite wealthy themselves.

>>4986806
>My Twisted World
>The Story of the life of Eliot Rodger
>by Eliot Rodger
>Introduction by Eliot Rodger
>Published by the International Eliot Rodger Publishing Group, a subsidiary of Eliot Rodger Industries

>>4987072
what's really funny is the fact that you're responding to that seriously, because it proves you have no familiarity with marx.

>>4986806
Unabomber. Ted is a smart guy with an unusual moral compass.

As for other mass murderer manifestos, are there any? The Finish school shooter (Matti Juhani Saari). His ideology was: I am smart, most people are dumb, this has been caused by the end of natural selection through modern society, I will publish this manifesto to start a revolution of smart people killing the dumb people after it becomes well known through the shooting. Basically narcissism.

Anyone want to speculate on why Eliot murdered people? Or just narcissism combined with not having an amazing life accord to external standards in one respect (socially).

>>4987128
what a rusemeister

Ted's featured criticism of modern society, but his solutions were absolutely retarded.

Brevik's seemed like it was responding to legitimate issues, but he oversimplified them. Also, his rhetoric was just plain silly.

Rodger's was just petty and whiny, but as >>4986881 said, it does interestingly reflect on our society.

>>4986851
Which one?

>>4987117

>>4986806
Mein Kampf takes the cake

>>4986881
He was a narcissist at his core. Just from his writing you could tell that he was a vain douchebag, and thats the reason why nobody wanted to be around him and that women avoided him like the plague.

He just couldnt come to terms with the concept that maybe he was the reason for all his troubles, and that he wasnt a victim.

Thats actually a fairly common condition among young people, most grow out of it.

>>4987117
Honestly, God himself delegated the writing of his sacred book to a bunch of desert dwelling goons; eliot did it all by himself instead. I guess he really was divine after all.