/lit/ - Literature

I'm not responsible for explaining my anti-responsibnigoanslm.

The majority of /lit/ posters are very young and haven't had enough experience out of the house in order to gain responsibility.

>>4887860
i'm personally for myself acquiring as much responsibility as possible since everyone is an incompetent faggot so i might as well be the incompetent faggot in charge

>>4887860
>I find that the overwhelming majority of /lit/ ascribe to anti-responsibilityism.
I think you're confusing us with /r9k/

I've never really gotten that vibe from /lit/.

>>4887860
Having to be responsible sucks. It's work. Why should I work a job when I can just kick it on disability? One person isn't enough to effect the economy in a significant way.

If you frequently pirate your media - it's the same mentality. Why pay when you can get away with no-strings-attached theft?

>>4887860
>find that the overwhelming majority of /lit/ ascribe to anti-responsibilityism

Please explain your methodology.
What is your control group

honestly i don't see the issue with welfare etc. since it allows low quality people to be very easy separated from worthwhile people as they are forced into low priced hovels in shitty neighborhoods or wherever

>>4887860
>I find that the overwhelming majority of /lit/ ascribe to anti-responsibilityism.
how did you determine this? by the times a post with an anti-responsible tone is written? do you count every post as a single anon? what are the parameters?

>Semantics
>Defence of welfare

haha yep, I am right.

>>4887860
Take your self-important nonsensical ersatz-reactionary questions and put them up my ass ASAP.

>>4889839
Why do you hate responsibility?

>What's responsible for this ideology taking such prominence in the new millennium?
>What's responsible

I don't understand the question.

>>4889830

Are you saying that welfare is always bad

Because that is wrong

>>4889913
Welfare isn't the topic under discussion--responsibility is.

Why does most of /lit/ hate the concept of responsibility and the act of being responsible?

>>4889830
VVV
>>4888475

>>4887860
I don't believe in the herds idea of responsability but whatever.

>>4889915
Define responsibility.
Then define anti-responsibilityism.
Then tell us how you see it in /lit/.
Then we will respond.

>>4887860
>I find that the overwhelming majority of 4chan ascribe to anti-responsibilityism
FTFY

>>4889959
>Semantic argument

The definition of responsibility isn't what this thread is about. What we're talking about is your refusal to uphold responsibility as a character defining trait and ideology.

>>4890149
He's asking you to prevent a semantic argument by clearly defining your terms ya dingus.

>>4890149
OP murdered his own thread. Why not.

>>4890149
So, apparently I (whom, for all you or I know, you have never talked to before) am refusing to uphold a certain but unknown concept as a character-defining trait and ideology. And I'm supposed to tell you why I am doing this.

What.

>>4892617
Just define responsibility. You can't start a thread by calling everybody anti X without specifying what X is.

>>4893653
That ain't OP nigga.

>>4893663
I don't give a damn. Fuck elves.

>>4893688