/lit/ - Literature

>>4714785
No, but look in the mirror and you'll see a good argument for it.

>>4714790
You're a big guy. huh?

No thanks.

>>4714790
if you get the chance, you should kill yourself

>>4714790
OP here. Speaking from experience, you fat turd?

>>4714792
For you.

>>4714790
#rekt
Kill yourself, OP. this thread is over

go back to /tv/ you fucking illiterate

antinatalism is a fad like chocolate rain

all this fanwank about anti-natalism and the yellow king is making me hate this show without even ever watching it

which is too bad because it might be good

another victim of the zeitgeist v_v

>>4714803
>you fucking illiterate

If I'm illiterate, how come I can read your posts? Is everyone on /lit/ an elitist piece of shit?

>>4714807

well....

>>4714807
yes

>>4714807
>Is everyone on /lit/ an elitist piece of shit?
Almost.

Try Ligotti's Conspiracy Against the Human Race, OP. Whatever ever he says, Nic Pizzolatto was pulling mostly from that.

>>4714807
No, we just don't like wasting our time on fads. Had you not mentioned True Detective, maybe you would've received a more positive reception. Why would we help you when you're ostensibly more interested in understanding a TV show than the literature itself?

Considering how anti-natalism almost always follows from pessimism:
Zapffe's essay The Last Messiah, >>4714817, Schopenhauer's On the Suffering of the World and other writings, Cioran etc.
Here's a poem by Philip Larkin:
They fuck you up, your mum and dad.
They may not mean to, but they do.
They fill you with the faults they had
And add some extra, just for you.

But they were fucked up in their turn
By fools in old-style hats and coats,
Who half the time were soppy-stern
And half at one another’s throats.

Man hands on misery to man.
It deepens like a coastal shelf.
Get out as early as you can,
And don’t have any kids yourself.

>>4714831
This, op.
Also, I need to ask...how comes most threads on /tv/ aren't about tv?

>>4714798
Off topic, but you guys realise the "for you" quote is really misused. In the movie, the CIA man asked if taking off the mask would hurt, to which Bane replies, "It would be extremely painful.... for you"

>>4714831
for you

>>4714844
Thanks, big guy

>>4714806
All these assholes are making me feel some animosity towards both anti-natalism and cosmic horror.

And they used to be some of my favourite things.

>>4714844
>If I take that off, will you die?
>It would be extremely painful
>You're a big guy
>FOR YOU

I'M A BIG GUY FOR YOU

>>4714880
The CIA man thought it would be painful for Bane, but what he actually meant was it would be painful for CIA man. I am a big guy for you doesn't even make sense.

>>4714886
>CIA man

He's not with the CIA, he's with another branch of the government.

>>4714891
He's with the CIA. He says so "I'm CIA."

>>4714916
No, he says "I'm See Ayay". He's Jewish.

>>4714798
>>4714855
>>4714856
>>4714880
>>4714886
>>4714891
>>4714916
>>4714919
/lit/ everybody

I swear to god this is the same guy who makes these threads every week and he just does it or /lit/s reaction

>>4714926
it's called viral marketing

>>4714928
>It's not a troll
>It's viral marketing on a board with like 100 people for some movie channel show

Go back to /v/, dicknibbler.

I think we could really do with a sticky about these sort of threads. They're just vile.

Just dump them a bunch of links or something. Get them out of here.

>>4714935
"movie channel shows" make a killing on netflix