/lit/ - Literature

Correction: The *only* way to make sense of the practice science is through consistent idealism

Go back to the 19th century and don't come back.

>>4554031
Huh, did you say something, Schopenhauer? Still brooding over my critique?
>>4553912
Oh, and, Hegel, please sit down, you bloody obscurantist.

>>4554038
>Muh waifu
>Such existential crisis

>>4553912
One morning a uman spirit awoke from its slumber and became aware of itself, by a voice calling. Outside its window beckoned world, moaning: "come fill me up with your Geist, realize youself in me."When that human spirit entered world and fulfilled here into a Weltgeist, s/he saw s/he had always been there.

Die monaden haben keine fenstern. That's why they are always already outside.

What do you mean reconile reality and science? They are intimately bound up with eachother.

>>4554031
>19th
wat?

Daily reminder that the scientific method works irregardless of anti-intellectual philosophers' interjections.

>>4554221
daily reminder that the fact that you post this every day makes you actually autistic

>>4554228
>muh feelings

I took the autism test and it turned out I'm normal. Once again science proves you wrong, philosofag.

>>4554232
why would you even bother with this

WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO CONVINCE

>>4554238
Who am I trying to convince? Posters who are not as ideologically blinded as you are.

>>4553912
Soon you'll be getting a communication from the KGB. Pack your bags. You're going to do great things.

>>4554221
The idea of falsification is a philosophical idea. The idea of science itself is a philosophical idea. Philosophy is the canopy of everything you imagine in your head. The only first principles are purely philosophical, not scientific. Once you get to science you've already gone a thousand miles through countless axioms.

>>4554243
>ideologically blinded as you are.
>thinking you are outside ideology
kek

>>4554221
>irregardless

What is all this retarded shit?

>>4554261
Appeal to tradition is a fallacy.

>>4554274
Science doesn't know ideology. Science only cares about objective truth.

>>4554306
>Science doesn't know ideology. Science only cares about objective truth.
Apart from the sciences which study ideology.

>>4554306
There is no such thing as objective truth. Quantifying nature is not an "objective truth".

>>4554308
Don't be a literalist. You know what I meant. Stop pretending to be autistic.

>>4554317
The laws of nature are objective.

>>4554324
Oh lighten up you old fartbucket.

>>4554330
>ad hominem

ITT: people who fail to distinguish objectivity and probability from universality anc necessity.

>>4554333
It's not ad hominem it's just an insult. For it to be ad hominem, I'd had to have framed it as though it undermined what you were saying.

>>4554169
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/19th_century
Thank me later ;)

>>4554153
In Hegel's alternate universe they aren't.

>>4554750
Google Hegel's birthday, will you?

>>4554760
Google Hegel's day of death, will you?

>>4554760
>Being this autistic AND retarded.