/lit/ - Literature

Troll detected.

>>4012020
>they can even prove universe came from nothing.

they do?

Well I'm an atheist myself but please fuck off OP you are being a douche. Your post has nothing to do with literature.

Holy fuck.

Please be a troll.

>>4012021
Nope. It's just a poor quality troll, ignore him.

>>>/sci/

forget to sage
>>4012028

>how do you deal with the fact atheism
stopped reading there

you're obviously shitposting at such a high speed accross boards that you are cutting words

quality trolling> shitty spammed trolling attempts

>Literature

>>4012020
I'm agnostic, use to feel "atheistic" (LOL) about life aswell but you can't argue something isn't true when there is essientially no proof that can say it is or isn't true in the first place. How do you know scientists aren't wrong, did you figure it out yourself ? Essientially you're reading something that is published bysomeone else with only there assurance, just like the bible, quran etc..

>>4012028
The Bible and knowledge has everything to do with literature, God created those things. So I guess he has everything to do with literature too. If you don't believe in him discussing it is a form of debate that effects the origin of literature, therefore relevant to /lit/

>>4012020
It's not that there aren't gods, it's just that they're jerks.

>three hours later
>345 posts and 102 image replies omitted. Click here to view

>>4012020
You're an anti-intellectual. The Word of God is imperishable; it will withstand all the verbal arrows you shoot at it because, unlike science, it is made true by the salubrious juices of faith.

>>4012059
God is perfectly benevolent.

>>4012040
All agnostics are just atheists without cojones.

>>4012040
>I'm agnostic

Agnostic ____? Theist, Deist, Pantheist, Atheist? You need to fully qualify your stance.

>>4012087
>You're an anti-intellectual. The Word of God is imperishable;
the ironing

>>4012087
Catholics are the niggers of Christianity
Enjoy your corrupt faith

>>4012095
LOL, whatever. Protestants are definitely the niggers of Christianity. Any farmer's son who takes a notion can be a preacher. That's. Not a good thing.

in fact you only belive in god because you are afraid of death

>Believe in god
>Don't believe in heaven
>Also don't believe he's looking out for me/will do me favours if I ask nicely

What now, eh?

>>4012098
Most reverends I know have a PhD in Theology, it's not the 19th century anymore

Enjoy praying to saints

>>4012030
If you already forgot to sage, what is the point of adding a sage post?

>>4012138
It gets the thread one post closer to the post limit.

Jesus Christ who is the chick? She is hot as fuck? Look in her eye like she'd roll you over

>>4012092
HAHAHAHA
By ignoring the Word of the One True God you are partaking of mental masochism. God is the filter through which Truth is glimpsed.

>>4012095
Don't be so angry. That you can't comprehend the beauty and thus the truth of the One True Church is your problem. I'll pray for you to find your way.

>>4012137
I will. Enjoy getting crunched between Satan's sooty buttocks.

>>4012063
>That many posts on /lit/
>Anywhere but a sticky

blah blah blah religion or no religion what a fucking bore suck my cock i hate these threads

>read krauss or harris

>>4012020

>in fact you only belive in god because you are afraid of death

this is very problematic, fatal to your argument in fact

>>4012193
Harris can actually stir one's intellectual waters pretty well. Plus, he can effortlessly piss off mussulmans. Krauss, though an accomplished physicist, is a terrible debater. Hitchens is still the best way to go if the whole atheist thing inflames your loins.

>>4012180
u wot m8?

>>4012020
>they can even prove universe came from nothing
does not mean
>atheism is proven correct by modern scientists

but nice try anyway

>>4012180
>not recognizing anita saarkesian
>2013

she's some feminist that got /v/ to make a huge hissy fit because she made the radical assertion that video games might be a tad sexist

>>4012227
also didn't do her research and oversimplifies her points a lot, as if that somehow made her message more appealing instead of making her look like a idiot.

I'm not even particularly convinced that I exist, so how can or why should I have an opinion on the existence or non-existence of God if there is no "I" to hold the opinion?

>krauss or harris
Oh wow.

>>4012020
Why the fuck do you bring Sarkeesian here?

Pic related, a happy woman.

>>4012227
>tad sexist
you are colon crucified. so what if they are? why do you have to change something i enjoy?

i have a sneaking suspicion that op is in fact a filthy theist in disguise attempting to subvert and undermine our euphoric movement from within

>>4012020

Assuming you're not trolling.

>atheism is proven correct by modern scientists
Modern science does not point towards Gods non-existence. It simply doesn't point towards his existence.

>they can even prove universe came from nothing
Logically and scientifically incongruous and impossible.

>in fact you only belive in god because you are afraid of death
A very grand generalization. You can believe in God because you want a more fulfilling life, believe the word of the Bible and find it convincing or a plethora of other reasons.

>the religions are just made to control you
This has nothing to do with God and belief in God. And they control you as much as you allow them to.

>but you probably don't even understand what i'm saying because you've neither read krauss or harris
I've Harris' turd on morality, how morality can be explained by neurology. Apparently Harris has not even a hint of moral philosophy, presenting the most atrociously stupid arguments imaginable. On top of that he bases his philosophy (if such a stupidity can be called so) on neurology, a science which has given little to no answers to questions relating to the most basic functions of the human body. Expecting this science to give answers to the question of morality is quite the stretch.

>and you call yourself intellectuals when you really read only fiction and useless poetry
Read the 'Birth of Tragedy' by Nietzsche.
Pic related: why I read literature.

>>4012323
Burn him!

>>4012087
>salubrious juices

>>4012091
>2013
>having a stance
>forcing others to label themselves
dislodge the stick from your ass please, pal.

>>4012087

> salubrious juices of faith
> oh /lit/

>>4012395
>still avoiding your stance

Typical self-proclaimed Agnostic: an intellectual-coward, through and through.