/lit/ - Literature

How can one suppose that something which is inherently indefinable is indefinable?

What's that, Lessie?

A twelve-something year old's 9deep4u baby-revelation that everything mingles around social constructs, namely, words? Oh no!

Fuck the police! Everything is meaningless!

>>3998907
>something which is inherently indefinable is indefinable
you are ascribing properties to something you haven't even proven to exist in the first place; you have it ass-backwards, son

> not just being a gnostic because you know you carry the spark

nice try, demiurge

>>3998921
how can descriptions of something no one has ever seen/experienced and/or it is impossible to be experienced, hence not existing in physical, empirically verifiable reality can be anything other than a social construct, you dumbfuck?


kill yourself

I was actually embracing that when I was twelve. No shit.

>>3998929
but then you read the bibel and learned god is an old grandpa with a white beard and hatred of women and it all made sense

>>3998931
No, I learned that talking about God isn't any more meaningless than everything else. I'm not a religious man, but ignosticism is stupid.

>>3998928
>impossible to be experienced
Off to your Logic class, sport

Poor 12 year old has just recently learned the words 'empirical' and 'verifiable'. So cute.

>>3998907
>meaningless
>implying anything is meaningful
>implying meaningless is bad

>>3998928
So, talking about social constructs is meaningless?

>>3998907
that is the most fedora that ever fedora

>>3998928
>empirically verifiable reality
can you empirically verify that?

>>3998936
3 month old babby never learned what a social construct is. 2cute4me

killed yourself yet?

>>3998962
with empirical measurements

>>3998970

More cooked-up terms for people to avoid owning their Atheism because of the baggage it entails.

Yay.

>>3998976
>the baggage it entails
such as?

>>3998979
Can't handle scientific truth?

>>3998991
Fedoras are heavy!

Clearly the only reasonable religious path is Joycean agnosticism, where you acknowledge that God(s) may exist but spurn them because religion inhibits the human experience.

>>3999002
>where you acknowledge that God(s) may exist
[god] that doesn't interfere with reality is indistinguishable from a [god] that doesn't exist

also, since god is a meaningless buzzword, you can substitute [god] with basically any word or conceptual object ever

>>3999002
So, Agnostic Atheism.

>>3999028
yes

and no

>mfw people around me still haven't embraced Buddhism as The True Path
Come on y'all

>>3999002
>religion inhibits the human experience
how? it seems to me that religion is a fairly large part of the 'human experience'

>>3999055
not the right human experience

>>3999045
why does buddha look a little girl

>>3999062
which one is the right one?

it's not inherently meaningless. it's not meaningless at all.
God is well defined as the self containing, self consistent, self explanatory reason for all being. Albeit, different sects embellish more or less.

How does the definition of a sign being presupposed or the result of "composition" make it "inherently meaningless"?

>/lit/ - religion troll-threads

>>3999099
>/lit/ - "/pol/"
ftfy