[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 149 KB, 525x718, safe_cvccvmage.php.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3773228 No.3773228 [Reply] [Original]

is data abstraction?

>> No.3775673

is data abstraction what?

>> No.3775684

>>3775673

is it data abstraction?

>> No.3775687

>>3775684

are you fucking retarded?

>> No.3775689

>>3775687

Are you abstraction?

>> No.3775698
File: 170 KB, 450x313, stan filtration.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3775698

i am data, abstraction

>> No.3775709
File: 47 KB, 500x596, feel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3775709

>tfw no data abstraction

>> No.3775710
File: 15 KB, 402x318, data.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3775710

>> No.3775745 [DELETED] 

Fuck you, Thomas Pynchon, with your empty and nonsensical abstractions disguised as 'deep' metaphors, probably made for the incompetent reader who can't read nothing better.

>> No.3775755

Fuck you, Thomas Pynchon, with your empty and nonsensical abstractions disguised as 'deep' metaphors made for the incompetent reader, who can't read nothing better, feel that he's is an intellectual.

>> No.3775765

>>3775755
And what do competent readers, reading superior literature, read?
this thread is accidentally about to be about books

>> No.3775782

It is what was, then what will be the will of when?

>> No.3775784

Abstraction is the only thing that we can be absolutely sure of.

>> No.3775796
File: 46 KB, 500x750, 1367104171469.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3775796

>>3775784

hrhrhrhrhrhr

>> No.3775806

>>3775796

You always know just what to say, stan.

>> No.3775859

>>3775796

It's true though. The only absolute in this universe is randomness, everything else is up in the air.

>> No.3775866

>>3775859

That wasn't what I was saying though. I'm saying that everything that is known is an abstraction. The only non-abstraction - things-in-themselves - is a much-debated thing. I'm not saying I agree with bundle theory, but the fact is that we don't know FOR SURE that essence exists. Only abstractions of that possible underlying essence.

>> No.3775869

>>3775866

Fair enough.

>> No.3775898

>>3775710
but that's a picture of spot