/lit/ - Literature

>>3340190
Giving the quarterback head behind the cafeteria dumpster.

>Brain is connected to an organ in the body
Where was Miss Wolf during her biology classes?

And women say -we- think with our dicks

We had this thread when the book came out.

Hell, you were there. Were you the one that started it?

There have been studies about the GI tract having a "mind" of it's own, in the way that it communicates with the brain to dictate function/dysfunction. But the vag? Seems far-fetched and also, unwelcome for most sane vag owners.

If anything this is a blow to feminism. Woman want 'equality' yet claim they are biologically different as they think with their clunge.

>>3340152
>thinking with your dick
>2k13

>that many neuroscientists call 'a single system'
You mean, like, I dunno, a... body?

>>3340212
Wolf-types don't care about equality, they need to sell books so come up with this kind of garbage.

>>3340203
You're a very busy self-appointed moderator.

As to this book about vagins, it just shows, I really knew how to blow her mind, if you know what I mean.

>feminism
>Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ shitposts
>twunny ten plus three pennies

>best pic I could find when I searched "andrea dworkin facepalm"

Why does /lit/ only think fatuous, unsupported arguments about the mind are problematic when they come from a feminist perspective?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/sep/16/vagina-naomi-wolf-digested-read

>>3340288
>Wolf-types don't care about equality
Feminists don't care about equality. They're pro-female, not egalitarian.

>>3340711
well duh it's a liberation movement. equality follows liberation.

>>3340706
misogyny + being uneducated = academic quality and intellectual honesty

>>3340742
>equality follows liberation
Unfortunately this is far from being true.

>>3340774
fortunately you're wrong

>>3340778
Unfortunately, you're mistaken.

let me save you bitches 9.99 off amazon.

the key to transformative sex is to have the guy hambone you. done.

>>3340858
what is hambone?

>>3340901
ohboyherewego.jpg

>>3340152
I would never post such a thread.
And Wolf has obviously gone nuts with this book.

Sage/hide/ignore

>>3340910
Well? What is hambone?

Reading that quote, and it's...it's like she just skimmed a headline, got all the details wrong, and vomited up this nonsense.

What studies are showing is how little actually control themselves, how so much of what we pass off as "rational thought" is really just rationalizations for giving in to our basest desires.

This is not a good thing.

I've read a couple reviews about this book in Newsweek, Time, other literary reviews, etc. and almost everyone seemed to legitimately worry about this woman's mental health.

>>3340152
Why doesn't she just accept that gender isn't performative, and that most feminist theory since de Beauvoir was all bullshit?

This seems to be the unsaid implication, that gender is biological, not a social construct after all.

>>3344544
>Why doesn't she just accept that gender isn't performative

Because to a certain extent it is.

>mfw if a man published this drivel, he would be called a misogynist and would get a pack of slutwalkers burning phallic crosses on his front lawn.

What is it with Jewish women and perverse feminism?

>>3345217

I don't know, but I have a thing for both Jewish women and feminists I can silence with the relentless thrust of my hardy masculinity. Keep it coming, I say! Make my tumescence turgid, you filthy slut.

>>3345221
>Make my tumescence turgid, you filthy slut.

>>3340152
dude i love pussy