[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 104 KB, 554x640, 3351618688_66b3a9ec8a_z.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3310345 No.3310345 [Reply] [Original]

so /lit/,

Nietzsche or Aristotle? Which do you choose?

Any other strong critiques of post-structuralism?

Also, virtue ethics general.

>> No.3310351

Why do you want me to choose between a rigorous, systematic thinker and an impassioned, lucid, and insightful wise man?

>> No.3310356

>>3310345
>Nietzsche or Aristotle? Which do you choose?
>Which do you choose?

Are you this stupid?

>Any other strong critiques of post-structuralism?
>Also, virtue ethics general.

Non-sequitur

>> No.3310363

>>3310356
You haven't read MacIntyre, I gather.

>> No.3310367

>>3310351
Because of the serious implications it has for moral philosophy and the possibility of ethics.

>> No.3310370

>>3310363
No, I haven't. Got any recommendations? I just read his Wikipage; interesting bloke this MacIntyre

>> No.3310371

>>3310370
Downloading his After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory at the moment; it better be good, OP.

>> No.3310810

>>3310371
or else what?

>> No.3310837

I like both for different reasons but I like some people considered post-structuralists and the way in which Nietzsche influenced them.

I haven't read After Virtue but I really would like to. One my profs was a student of MacIntyre's and she always talks about how her first year in grad school she felt way out of her depth and ended up asking what she thought was a stupid question about Aristotle to a visiting scholar at a lecture but apparently it was some brilliant point that MacIntyre got super excited about and took her out to lunch with him. She's a bad ass prof.

>> No.3310850
File: 132 KB, 310x459, 1356826362054.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3310850

>>3310810

>> No.3311210

'