[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 100 KB, 768x528, 1356763061360.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3294969 No.3294969 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.3295021

I don't get it.

>> No.3295027

go away you mong
>>>/sci/

>> No.3295032

>>3295021
>>3295027

why can't you fuckers let it alone. please. please.

>> No.3295048

>>3295032
But I don't get it.

>> No.3295050

>>3295048

Then shut the fuck up and hide the post and stop pretending not to be OP bumping his vacant thread.

>> No.3295076
File: 93 KB, 1563x318, 1349542935160.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3295076

>> No.3295078

>>3295076

Stop baiting this shit thread. Seriously.

>> No.3295108

>>3295078
Stop replying to every fucking post telling them to stop doing things

>> No.3295114

>>3295076
Holy shit this is wrong on so many levels I don't know where to start.

>> No.3295119

>>3295108

It's too late now, anyhow. The thread is well on it's way to staying here for a week.

Have a bump.

>> No.3295122

>>3294969
How the fuck is plate tectonic derived from geology?

>> No.3295152

>>3294969

The most worthwhile, fundamental subjects in that pic are:

Mathematics

Philosophy

Religion

& magic.
Kansas Academicals 1, Oz United 3.

>> No.3295177
File: 45 KB, 208x208, echo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3295177

>mathematics/geometry falsifiable
>relies on intersubjective a priori intuitive concepts

>> No.3295184

>>3295076
Wow that guy is probably serious too

>> No.3295253

>>3295177
<3

>> No.3295263

Mathematics?

Oh right, you mean that 2=2 stuff right?
Yeah big stuff, big stuff.

>> No.3295271

i just like how they feel so insecurely compelled to make the pictures in the first place

>> No.3295276

>>3295263
Sounds like someone failed math high school.

>> No.3295279
File: 538 KB, 410x2048, 1320540329123.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3295279

>>3295271
You mean, as insecure as this guy?

>> No.3295289

>>3295279
it's not like it's a diatribe against science. plus that picture is a trick

>> No.3295293
File: 565 KB, 1506x1304, 1320537868060.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3295293

>>3295289
Or this guy?

>> No.3295301

>>3295289
Game of Thronesie detected

>> No.3295303
File: 138 KB, 668x766, 1320540385270.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3295303

>>3295301
Well well well, looks like you ARE that insecure then.

>> No.3295304

>>3295301
newfag detected
d&e stop

>> No.3295307
File: 38 KB, 512x512, 1321649949250.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3295307

>>3295304
subjectivist detected
pls go

>> No.3295312

Great movie.

>> No.3295348

>>3295312
The Scarecrow has a gun!

>> No.3295355 [DELETED] 

>>3295177
Owned.

>> No.3295360

>>3295303
And what if two persons with the same studies strongly disagree whether a book is good or not. Who's right then?

>> No.3295366

>>3295360
>And what if two persons with the same studies strongly disagree whether a book is good or not
Then they don't have the same studies

>> No.3295369

>>3295177
Owned.

>> No.3295377

>>3295369
>>3295355
>>3295177
>>3295253
Why do you keep replying to yourself?

>> No.3295382

>>3295366
I do think that art criticism (including literature) is at least a little bit subjetive, because two people with the same level of studies (not necessarily the same studies) won't always agree.