[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 28 KB, 350x432, 6a00d83452989a69e200e5510bbb968833-800wi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3211373 No.3211373[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Reading a book would be like watching a movie, but instead of
moving at 24 fps, it would go 1 fps with the same reel length.

>> No.3211390
File: 191 KB, 500x464, tumblr_m40mc6e2az1qltlzco1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3211390

My God! That movie would be twenty-four times longer!

>> No.3211400

Why? The frames wouldn't contain any extra detail would they? What you're advocating would just be longer movies. Maybe less quick-cutting shots and more long takes.

Also I don't think you get why film moves at 24fps. It's merely because that is the correctly determined speed to convey cohesive motion from the frames.

If this is a copypasta then sorry I haven't seen it before.

>> No.3211401

>>3211390

1.21 GIGAWATS?!?!?

>> No.3211411

>>3211400
>pasta
probably not, but it is trolling

>> No.3211413

>>3211400
I think the point is that movies are about a two hour experience while books are a week-long endeavor.

>> No.3211424

It's sad how movies have ruined everyone's attention span.

>> No.3211428

>>3211411
Yeah we get plebs from /tv/ coming in here daily.
Just have to learn to weed them out.

>> No.3211430

>>3211424

>movies

Are you seriously blaming movies for ruining people's attention spans? If anything people, even /lit/izens, spend more time watching a movie in one sitting than they do reading.

>> No.3211457
File: 455 KB, 357x267, AQV9L.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3211457

>>3211373
>>3211390
>>3211400
>>3211401
>>3211413
>>3211424
>>3211428
>>3211430

hey, /lit

let's not do this

>> No.3211865
File: 32 KB, 500x498, 1351837751020.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3211865

Excuse me OP.

You fail to realise the sheer idiocy of what you've said. If one attempted to play any film a 1fps then there would be trouble.. The xenon lamp inside most commercial projectors are EXTREMELY hot during operation. So much so that if a single frame was in front of the gate (where the film gets the light shone through, dummy) for a whole second, it would begin to burn..

Not too efficient to burn every print every time it's played is it now?

>> No.3213676

>>3211373

have you ever watch some of the Bela Tarr films?

>> No.3213690

>>3211430
>>3211424

about attention spans: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPpJoTmIeuc

>> No.3213726

>>3213690
>10 minutes
>aint nobody got time for that