[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 499 KB, 944x2292, truth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Aug 22 18:41:06 2012 No.2923765 [DELETED]

[DELETED]

[Reply] [Original]

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 18:42:06 2012 No.2923769 I never realized just how goofy looking Sartre really is.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 18:42:06 2012 No.2923768 Have you read Wittgenstein/Where would you put him?

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 18:43:51 2012 No.2923770 Most retarded one yet

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 18:44:50 2012 No.2923772 It's upside down, mate,

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 18:47:50 2012 No.2923779 >>2923768 Good tier

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 18:49:50 2012 No.2923790 >>2923779 I would put him higher, but OK.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 18:49:50 2012 No.2923791 rat-slayer?

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 18:54:50 2012 No.2923808 File: 29 KB, 468x324, literature.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2923770 >>2923772 >dem arguments

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 18:55:50 2012 No.2923812 File: 2.05 MB, 944x2292, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2923772 Not that I agree with OP's list but I fail to see how this one is better.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 18:57:23 2012 No.2923817 >No Heraclitus or any of the pre-socratics >No Socrates Entire list is surrounded by the stench of pleb.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:01:24 2012 No.2923824 File: 23 KB, 600x600, AwKvl[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >Sartre >Stirner >fucking Locke

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:03:23 2012 No.2923827 Nietzsche, Aquinas, and Kierkegaard are all top-tier OP is a faggot

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:04:23 2012 No.2923828 >>2923765 >Stirner edgy as fuck man

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:05:57 2012 No.2923830 >>2923817 >Socrates contributing anything >presocratics >ever being right about anything pick nothing

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:07:57 2012 No.2923834 >>2923808 That looks like a very sophisticated and dignified young boy. I appreciate your comparing us to him.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:08:55 2012 No.2923838 File: 67 KB, 465x328, lit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2923834 >>2923828 >>2923827 >>2923824 it's like i'm really on /lit/ thanks for proving that this list is right

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:10:55 2012 No.2923845 I rearranged this to fit my personal inclinations regarding these philosophers. What do you think, /lit/?

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:11:55 2012 No.2923846 >>2923765 You have Kant and Locke in patrician tier and can't even be bothered to mention Hume. What plebeian shit is this?

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:11:55 2012 No.2923847 File: 2.06 MB, 928x2936, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2923845 Captcha ate my image. Here it is.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:12:57 2012 No.2923848 >>2923838 I'm convinced he will grow up to be Lord Byron. Just look at him.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:12:57 2012 No.2923850 >>2923765 Pretentious tier: all of them

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:14:58 2012 No.2923855 >>2923847 Husserl is one of the most important and influential philosophers of the 20th century, duder..

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:14:58 2012 No.2923857 >>2923847 Husserl is Obi Wan Kinobe and Heidegger is Darth Vader.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:14:58 2012 No.2923856 >>2923850 >all of the philosophers OP listed >pretentious Are there, by any chance, any philosophers that you don't consider pretentious? If so, could you list a few?

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:15:58 2012 No.2923861 d&e already did the ultimate /lit/ philosophy graph like ages ago. This is like a child's game in comparison.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:16:57 2012 No.2923863 Socrates Tier: Socrates That's my entire list.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:16:57 2012 No.2923864 >>2923856 it's obvious that a pleb like that cannot into philosophy

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:17:57 2012 No.2923867 >>2923856 >Hesse >Rand Step up.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:18:57 2012 No.2923868 >>2923846 Kant shat on Hume all the time. Therefore he is relegated to mere 'Good' Tier

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:19:57 2012 No.2923872 the whole idea of classifying philosophers qualitatively is wrong. You can compare their arguments in a certain topic or concept but judging as a whole is wrong.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:19:57 2012 No.2923873 >>2923857 As long as you recognize that Russell is Saruman and Wittgenstein is Gandalf, OK..

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:21:57 2012 No.2923875 >>2923873 That is literally the best analogy of philosophy I've ever read. Thank you.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:21:57 2012 No.2923876 >>2923867 >Rand How about that also aren't shit?

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:21:57 2012 No.2923874 >>2923868 No, Kant said that Hume put him back on the right track, away from being so dogmatic. Nietzsche famously shat on Kant and lauded Hume, remarking that not enough attention had been paid to the Scotsman..

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:22:57 2012 No.2923878 >>2923873 Now do Lao Tzu and Camus.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:22:57 2012 No.2923881 >>2923873 Only if the One Ring is logical positivism.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:22:57 2012 No.2923882 File: 236 KB, 480x360, 1344116249013.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2923867 >Hesse >Rand

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:25:02 2012 No.2923886 >>2923876 >>2923882 >implying hesse and rand are shit You may not agree with Rand, but you must always admit that she does make a great point, and Hesse is one of the most brilliant spiritualists of our time.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:26:03 2012 No.2923889 >>2923875 You're welcome, especially since I know virtually nothing about analytic philosophy NOR Lord of the Rings

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:32:04 2012 No.2923904 >>2923886 Lol, this coming from someone who calls all philosophy pretentious. Hesse's work is good, but ygsiu son

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:33:04 2012 No.2923909 >>2923886 >>2923882 >>2923876 >>2923867 Did they change the rules about her? Where have I been and why isn't /lit/ swamped with threads...

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 22 19:43:20 2012 No.2923932 >>2923909 They did. It was swamped for a few hours. If you start one, unless you're really subtle about it, you get 5-10 posts tops.